Search Results

1. LCRO 70/2018 AR v NM (10 April 2019) [pdf, 212 KB]

   ...“position in a clear and forthright manner”. [26] Concerning Mrs AR’s request for directions, the Committee explained that its role was to consider and determine complaints about a lawyer’s conduct, “not to provide legal advice” as requested by Mrs AR. 5 Application for review [27] Mrs AR filed her application for review with this Office on 3 May 2018. She seeks (a) a “reprimand” for Mrs NM in respect of [Mrs NM’s] “unprofessional dealings” carrying...

2. OH v RI Ltd [2020] NZDT 1678 (20 July 2020) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1678 APPLICANT OH RESPONDENT RI Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: [1] OH rented a three-bedroom apartment managed by RI Ltd (RI) for one week at a cost of $3,030.00. After checking in to the apartment, he discovered that one of the bedrooms had no window. OH delayed raising the is...

3. O'Hagan v Police [2020] NZHRRT 22 [pdf, 827 KB]

   ...facts in this case are clear and not in dispute. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: O’Hagan v Police [2020] NZHRRT 22. Note publication restrictions.] 2 [2] Mr O’Hagan made a request under IPP 6 for access to certain of his personal information held by the Police. The decision of the Police on that request was delivered 18 working days beyond the expiry of the 20 working days allowed by s 40(1) of the Privacy Act 19...

4. QH v TU Ltd [2022] NZDT 12 (22 March 2022) [pdf, 236 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 12 APPLICANT QH RESPONDENT TU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QH is claiming for a refund of an amount charged by TU Ltd for towing her vehicle from [Address 1] to their yard in [Address 2]. 2. QH states she parked in a parking are...

5. DE & XE v SC [2024] NZDT 71 (15 January 2024) [pdf, 194 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 71 APPLICANT DE APPLICANT XE RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: SC is to pay XE and DE $1,000.00 by 9 February 2024. Background 1. DE and XE purchased a [vehicle] that SC had listed for sale on Trade Me. 2. The listing described the vehicle as “Good body, tyres and interior. Not running”. 3. The purchase price was $...

6. ME v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 213 (17 April 2023) [pdf, 192 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 213 APPLICANT ME RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) On 5 September 2022 the applicant travelled on flight bookings made with the respondent from [City A] to [City B] with the intention of connecting with an ongoing flight to [International City 1]. The applicant says that his...

7. [2020] NZEmpC 132 Alliance Group Ltd v Leckie [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED v BRIAR LECKIE [2020] NZEmpC 132 [25 August 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 132 EMPC 244/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Applicant AND BRIAR LECKIE Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Chemis, counsel for applicant R Donne...

8. Family Legal Advice Service Operational Policy v2.0 October 2023 [pdf, 931 KB]

   ...care agreements in the best interests of their children. • FDR Preparation for Mediation: a service to which people may be referred to, helping people manage their feelings and focus on their children for effective participation in FDR. Most CoCA applicants to the Family Court are required2 to attend PTS and attempt to resolve their disputes via FDR before court entry. FLAS, FDR, and Preparation for Mediation are free for those who meet the income eligibility threshold. Information...

9. IC v CH [2022] NZDT 104 (7 September 2022) [pdf, 172 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 104 APPLICANT IC RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: CH is to make available, on or before 21 October 2022, for packing and collection by a courier/transport company of IC’s choice, the [brand] crystal items that were the subject of the Trade Me auction won by IC on 7 November 2021; and On the confirmation of a...

10. NQ & SS v QG & Ors [2024] NZDT 83 (9 January 2024) [pdf, 218 KB]

    ...property at [address 1], and NQ is her partner. QG and NC own [address 2]. These properties share an adjoining boundary. This matter involves a claim filed by SS and NQ against all three respondents, and a counterclaim filed by QG and NC against the applicants, relating to the following events. 2. During 2021 a fence was erected on the shared boundary between [address 1] and [address 2]. QG and NC put forward the fencing proposal and engaged E Ltd to erect the fence. In June 202...