12531 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 8 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1640 APPLICANT IN and SC Trustees of M Trust RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 15 May 2012, IN and SC as trustees of M Trust (the “Trust”) purchased Unit Z at [address], [Suburb] in a unit title development from B Ltd (“the B Ltd”) in a mortgagee sale. IN h...
...a proceeding is a derogation from the principle that the parties have a right to be present throughout the hearing, the open evidence and submissions must contain as much as can be said in support of the withholding ground without compromising the claim that the information was lawfully withheld from the requester. Expressed another way, the closed evidence and submissions must be strictly confined to that which is necessary for the agency to justify the withholding decision under ss 27 a...
...For • Attending a Judicial meeting Re-preparation Re-preparation prior to hearing 3 $160 For • Re-preparation for a hearing just prior to the date of hearing District Court Appeal Where the listed provider did not represent the applicant at review $1,580 For • Taking instructions, attending the client • Reviewing ACC files and other relevant material • Preparing application for legal aid • Identifying legal and factual issues • Preparation and filin...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1316 APPLICANT NI RESPONDENT LNE Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT WXT Pty Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed Reasons 1. NI is claiming the Infrastructure Growth Charge (IGC) from LNE Ltd (LNE) for $13,823.00 which was charged by WXT Pty Ltd (WXT). She refers to clause 19 of the sale and purchase agre...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1327 APPLICANT SG RESPONDENT H Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2014, Mr G and a banking colleague, ST, embarked on an enterprise through a start-up company, H Limited (the company), to provide finance to companies secured by their accounts receivables. 2. In the early days...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 764 APPLICANT A Ltd RESPONDENT NT & TH The Tribunal orders: NT and TH are to pay $28,983.69 to A Ltd by 30/12/23. Reasons 1. This order should be read with that dated 11/5/23. 2. In brief A Ltd says that it is contractually entitled to be paid the amount of its invoices 879 and 876 and the installation of a power and/or water “meter” nee...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1631 APPLICANT MG RESPONDENT TX SECOND RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal orders: TX and QD are to pay MG $30,000.00 by 15 July 2021. Background 1. MG is TX’s daughter. 2. TX and QD own a farm property in [Settlement A]. 3. In 2016 there were conversations between QD, TX, MG, and MG’s then partner about ca...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 188 APPLICANT DM Ltd RESPONDENT GD Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TP Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT UD Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER JC Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 12 February 2020, DM Ltd was notified that customers had lost internet service...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 410 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In March 2023, NN purchased a [electric bike] from C Ltd in [City]. NN says the assurance from sales staff that the bike was also able to charge his phone was a critical factor in his purchase. NN quickly discovered however...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 646 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT IC The Tribunal orders: IC is to pay BE $2,120.00 on or before 20 December 2023. Reasons 1. BE bought a [vehicle] from IC via Trademe for $3,800.00. It was advertised as being in great condition for its age and having no issues apart from minor scrapes on front and rear bumper. However, the first day that...