Search Results

1. [2019] NZEmpC 7 Sawyer v The Vice-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington [pdf, 336 KB]

   ...VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON [2019] NZEmpC 7 [4 February 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2019] NZEmpC 7 EMPC 7/2017 IN THE MATTER OF of an application for access to court documents by Bartlett Law and Penelope Ryder-Lewis AND IN THE MATTER of a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN CAROLINE SAWYER Plaintiff...

2. NN v TU Ltd [2019] NZDT 1433 (21 February 2019) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1433 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT TU Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: TU Ltd is to pay the sum of $306.58 directly to NN on or before 14 March 2019. Reasons 1. NN parked at a pay and display carparking site monitored by TU Ltd in December 2018. She purchased a ticket for three hours and placed it on her dashboard....

3. NP v KM 2 [2023] NZDT 340 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 340 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT KM The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim for refund of the purchase price of the saddle is dismissed. 2. KM will arrange for the return of the saddle to NP by no later than 10 July 2023. KM and NP will share equally in the (reasonable) costs of returning the saddle (as set out in paragraph 19 below). Background 1. The...

4. LCRO 47/2021 BQ v ZG (16 December 2024) [pdf, 665 KB]

   ...and we can refuse to release said file unless and until our final invoice is paid in full. [24] On 29 April 2014, Ms ND wrote to (debt collector) seeking a statement of the total debt owed by the respondent and again to the ex-husband’s lawyers requesting his proposal for division of relationship property. 5 [25] There is no evidence on the file that any of Ms ND’s correspondence with Firm A, which was partly by fax and partly by email, was copied to the respondent or to Mr...

5. Family-Fixed-Fees-Schedules-July-2020-Updated-18-December-2023.pdf [pdf, 473 KB]

   ...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity Fe...

6. TQ v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 43 (20 February 2024) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...the terms of the Sale and Purchase Agreement required the respondent to remove asbestos. For that reason, the claim must be dismissed. Referee: B M Smallbone Date: Tuesday, 20 February 2024 Page 2 of 2 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

7. BL v GG Ltd [2022] NZDT 200 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 176 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 200 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT GG Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. GG Ltd is to pay BL $1479.95 on or before 23 December 2022. 2. Payment is to be by way of direct credit to [account number]. Reasons: 1. BL joined GG Ltd on 10 December 2021 and paid $2330.00 for a one-year membership. She says she joined this gym because...

8. EG v KI [2023] NZDT 247 (12 June 2023) [pdf, 109 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 247 APPLICANT EG RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: 1. KI is to pay to EG the sum of $1,851.50 on or before 3 July 2023 Reasons 1. In early 2022, KI trimmed some trees on EG’s property to improve his view. 2. EG considered that the work went beyond what was authorised and sought damages of $6,931.50 for the r...

9. NC Ltd v TE & HE [2024] NZDT 597 (17 July 2024) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 597 APPLICANT NC Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT TE SECOND RESPONDENT HE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TE and HE entered into a residential building contract with NC Ltd – the contract was for a fixed price of $267,652.89. 2. During the course of the building work, variations to the scope occurred f...

10. KD v SS [2021] NZDT 1409 (28 January 2021) [pdf, 203 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1409 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT SS The Tribunal orders: KD’s claim against SS is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 September 2020, KD emailed a notice that he wanted to build a fence between his property and the neighbouring properties. He emailed a fencing notice to SS and NS (the respondents) notifying them of his int...