Search Results

1. River Oaks Farm Ltd & Ors as Trustees of Ingodwe Trust v Olsson [2010] NZWHT Wellington 17 [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...cost of remedial work and they nominated a builder, Mr Walmsey, who has a good reputation in the industry and whose expertise in remediation work was confirmed by the Assessor. The first offer was contained in a fax of 18 December. It included a request the claimants contribute $50,000. In the fax of 2 February no contribution was sought. There was a cash offer of $300,000 given as an option. In the event the first and second respondents were held liable for $310,888. [30] Th...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 6 [pdf, 599 KB]

   ...'face' to our work. Working away in the Division it is easy to forget that 'claimants' are real people too. We sometimes need to be reminded of that. We have some limited work space available and researchers are welcome to any information that we hold in the Division. Where time permits, staff are also pleased to offer advice with research problems, or to direct researchers to particular information. Buddy Mikaere Director HEARINGS BEGIN IN TARANAKI The Urst...

3. List of offenders awarded compensation A-E

   If you‘re a victim of an offender named in a notice of payment into the Victims’ Claims Trust Account, you may be entitled to make a claim against the money awarded to the offender. Notice of end of process for making and determining victims’ claims Notice of payment into Victims’ Claims Trust Account This is the current list of offenders that have been awarded compensation - surnames A-E: Daniel Philip DIACK AKA Daniel Philip DLOCK   Daniel Philip DIACK AKA Daniel Philip DLOC...

   Located in:

   1. Tribunals >
   2. Victims & justice >
   3. Victims' Special Claims Tribunal >
   4. List of offenders awarded compensation

4. BX v PN Ltd & NN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1575 (5 August 2021) [pdf, 215 KB]

   ...refund of the purchase price plus freight costs, and compensation for loss of use of the boat. Both parties attended the hearing. Mr T represented NN Ltd. It is noted that the company PN Ltd is not relevant to these proceedings. That company was not formed until after the sale to BX, and it was named in these proceedings in error. Findings 9. The relevant law is the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993 (“CGA”). 10. Section 6 CGA states that where goods are supplied to a consumer...

5. RK v KS [2021] NZDT 1349 (20 April 2021) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...then reinforce the position of buyer beware in private sales, except in limited circumstances. 7. There is, however, relief available for a buyer of a good in a private sale when a misrepresentation is made in the process of the contract being formed. Under section 35 of the CCLA when someone has been induced to enter a contract by a misrepresentation, whether innocent or CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 fraudulent, that person is entitled to damages as if the representation wer...

6. MU v GB [2024] NZDT 189 (14 March 2024) [pdf, 160 KB]

   ...delivering the car to MU after he won the auction? c) If so, what is MU’s remedy? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Did MU have an enforceable contract with GB for the sale of the [vehicle]? 6. Parties to a contract must perform their respective obligations. If they do not, they will be in breach and need to account for any loss caused to the other party to the contract. 7. Part 3 of the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (CCLA) deals with the sale of goods....

7. OB v BB [2023] NZDT 33 (7 February 2023) [pdf, 142 KB]

   ...4. The driver of a third car, TT, stopped and spoke to the parties after the collision. 5. OB and X Ltd claim the $4327.39 cost of repairs to OB’s car. BB had wished to bring a counter- claim for her damages but did not realise this required a formal lodging of a claim for her $2585.50 costs of repair, and so did not do so in the adjournment period. The parties agreed that this would be dealt with by way of a liability finding in respect of either driver first, then an adjournment for

8. CN v UT & ST [2025] NZDT 30 (10 April 2025) [pdf, 166 KB]

   ...immigrated to New Zealand in 2019, he worked for ST as a chef. 13. The written evidence around the circumstances of CN’s payment of $10,600 is understandably limited given that CN and ST were friends at that time and their arrangements were informal. I must make a decision based on the evidence that is available to me. 14. My finding is that it is more likely than not that this payment was reimbursement to ST rather than a loan to him. 15. There is sufficient evidence to s...

9. TU v TG Ltd & SC [2024] NZDT 481 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...dismissed since no basis has been established for personal liability. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 19 June 2024 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. ED v MA [2023] NZDT 557 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 158 KB]

    Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) RESULT OF APPLICATION FOR REHEARING [2023] NZDT 557 APPLICANT person or organisation making the original claim ED RESPONDENT person or organisation originally claimed against MA Result of application for rehearing: Rehearing Granted The Order of 18 April 2023 is set aside. In due course the parties will be advised of the date and time of the new hearing. Reasons for decision: 1...