12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 368 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT TP The Tribunal orders: Application dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant is claiming the sum of $1,286.46 from the respondent for educational advocacy and decluttering services (see invoice). Education advocacy 2. The applicant is in business as an educational advocate. 3. She would for example, offer h...
...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 57 EMPC 127/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND BURGERT GILDENHUYS Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M McGoldrick, counsel for plaintiff D Vinnicombe, a...
...of the Family Legal Advice Service (FLAS) which was established to enable the provision of initial advice and information for eligible parties disputing arrangements involving the care of their children. This service is one of the family justice reforms introduced in 2014 following a review of the Family Court. Family justice system The reforms to the family justice system were designed to encourage, support, and inform less adversarial resolution of Care of Children Act 2004 (CoCA) di...
...http://www.justice.govt.nz/ iii Contents Police Detention Legal Assistance Service 4 Introduction 4 Authority for the service 4 Responsibilities of PDLA providers 4 PDLA services 4 Attendance 4 Duties 5 Obtaining PDLA approval 5 Application 5 Experience and competence requirements 5 Approval 5 Rosters and lists 6 Legal aid case assignment as a result of PDLA 6 An exception to PAL 1 and 2 rotational assignments 6 Travel 7 Submitting invoices 7 Forms 7...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 389 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT ON The Tribunal orders: ON is to pay M Ltd $1,500.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] M Ltd, represented by director XC, purchased a small second hand digger from ON. XC says that ON misrepresented the condition of the digger, and claims compensation. [2] XC said that he saw the digger advertised...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 202 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: The claim by DN is dismissed. Reasons 1. DN bought a pair of shoes in December 2023 with which she is not happy. She seeks a refund and other compensation on the basis the shoes are not of acceptable quality nor properly fitted in breach of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993....
...which are entirely speculative and without foundation. (b) The cause of action for defence must be clearly untenable. (c) The jurisdiction is to be exercised sparingly, and only in clear cases. This reflects the Court’s reluctance to terminate a claim or defence short of trial. (d) The jurisdiction is not excluded by the need to decide difficult questions of law, requiring extensive argument. (e) The Court should be particularly slow to strike out a claim in any developing area o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1704 APPLICANT TQ and IQ RESPONDENT ZC The Tribunal orders: ZC is to pay the sum of $1634.00 to TQ and IQ on or before 11 January 2022. Reasons 1. TQ and IQ as vendors and ZC as the purchaser entered into a sale and purchase agreement for a property, for which the original settlement date of 31 August 2021 was def
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 704 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: M Ltd is to pay $6537.80 to G Ltd on or before 24 September 2024. Reasons 1. M Ltd purchased a commercial truck from [Vehicle Sales Company]. [Vehicle Sales Company] recommended a local firm to custom-build a deck for the truck and that firm, P Ltd...
...is conducting an investigation into possible claims against Fletcher Group Ltd on behalf of some shareholders. Fletcher Construction is part of Fletcher Group. [5] Mayweathers anticipates that documents on the Court’s files may contain information important to its investigation because Mr Johnston was Fletcher Construction’s Financial Controller. Mayweathers understands that an aspect of the claim was about allegations as to the handling of financial information by Fletcher