12922 items matching your search terms
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 31 BETWEEN ABB Ltd APPLICANT AND ZZC Ltd RESPONDENT Date of Order: 24 January 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim by the Applicant is struck out. Facts [1] The Applicant alleges infringement of its copyright by the Respondent’s re-publishing of certain photographs, taken from its website, on th...
...but there has not yet been a judgment on the final application. You should carefully record the costs and disbursements you incur in bringing or defending a proceeding, as you may have to show evidence of them if your proceeding is successful and they form part of an application for costs. Costs In most cases, when a judge orders the unsuccessful party to pay costs, the Judge will allocate a scale for the costs to be calculated. The cost scales are listed in: Schedule 4 of the District Court...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 373 APPLICANT HE RESPONDENT QZ The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The counter-claim is dismissed. Background 1. The adjournment order dated 18 January 2023 sets out the background to the claim and counter-claim. 2. The third hearing took place in [Town] on 12 April 2023. Both parties...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 124 APPLICANT QD RESPONDENT TS The Tribunal orders: The application is struck out. Summary of Reasons: [1] The applicant appeared at hearing and confirmed that he was seeking reimbursement of money he claims he paid for immigration services on the respondent’s behalf. The applicant also confirmed that he was the respondent’s employer...
...MB 15 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20140007968 CJ 2014/11 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rangatira A No 96 BETWEEN EUNICE MAATA WHAREHINGA Applicant AND CODY WIREMU HENRY Respondent Hearing: 20 March 2015 (Heard at Wellington) Judgment: 20 March 2019 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2019 Chi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 251 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT NI SECOND RESPONDENT TF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NI and TF invited DI, NI’s brother, to move onto their rural property with his daughters at the start of covid lockdown. 2. The arrangement they made was that DI would build accommo...
...INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] This judgment decides two interlocutory applications made by the defendant. The first is an application for security for costs. The second seeks an order striking out the second amended statement of claim. [2] These applications have been made in the course of proceedings which have been before the Court since 9 July 2012. In the 13 months since they were commenced, the proceedings have involved numerous interlocutory applications...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 689 APPLICANT G Transport Ltd RESPONDENT D Autos Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Autos is to pay directly to G Transport the sum of $10,275.76 on or before 31 January 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant seeks a refund of a $10,275.76 deposit...
...APPLICANT BM APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is ordered to pay BM and KM the sum of $30,000.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 21 June 2024. Reasons: 1) In 2022 the applicants arranged for the respondent to remove their existing driveway and replace that. The applicants say that “within days of the new driveway being laid large parts of it failed.” The respondent returned and replaced about 2/3 of the dr...
Page 1 1 Response All respondents are required to file a written response to the claim. The response is not just a statement of defence. It should contain sufficient information to clearly inform the claimant and the other parties of the legal and factual basis of any disputes the respondent has with any part of the claims being made. It should also detail any defences and any claims being made against other parties. In particular, a response needs to set out:...