Search Results

1. Te Toki – Hako Hauraki (2013) 2013 Chief Judge’s MB 456 (2013 CJ 456) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...A20120008996 UNDER Section 30, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Hako Hauraki - Determine the appropriate representation of Hako Hauraki for the purposes of Treaty Negotiations BETWEEN MAATAI ARIKI RAWIRI KAUAE TE TOKI Applicant Hearing: 2013 Chief Judge's MB 368 - 369 dated 17 June 2013 55 Waikato-Maniapoto 227-253 dated 25 March 2013 52 Waikato-Maniapoto 103-104 dated 19 February 2013 2012 Chief Judge's MB 506-507 dat...

2. Mihaka v Housing New Zealand Corporation (Dismissal) [2017] NZHRRT 29 [pdf, 278 KB]

   ...2017 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL DISMISSING PROCEEDINGS 1 Introduction [1] When this two day fixture commenced on 19 July 2017 neither Mr Mihaka nor Ms Raue (his McKenzie friend) appeared. Housing New Zealand Corporation (HNZC) made oral application for the proceedings to be dismissed. In this decision we set out our reasons for granting that application. 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Mihaka v Housing New Zeal...

3. MI Ltd v QD Ltd [2022] NZDT 205 (18 July 2022) [pdf, 98 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 205 APPLICANT MI Ltd RESPONDENT QD Ltd The Tribunal orders: MI Ltd’s claim against QD Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant purchased a pilates reformer and tower from the respondent on Trade Me. The cost for the reformer was $4,300.00. The applicant claims the reformer bed was not in the condition it...

4. KV v TE LCRO 39/12 (15 June 2015) [pdf, 66 KB]

   LCRO 39/2012 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Standards Committee BETWEEN KV Applicant AND TE Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION [1] Mr KV has applied for a review of a decision by the Standards Committee in which the Committee decided that it was not necessary...

5. LB v MX & BJ Ltd [2024] NZDT 281 (22 February 2024) [pdf, 179 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 281 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT MX SECOND RESPONDENT BJ Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER BB Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 18 September 2022 LB was approaching the [roundabout], heading south. MX was driving in the same direction. LB claims that MX crossed into her la...

6. FU v IX [2024] NZDT 527 (2 August 2024) [pdf, 183 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 527 APPLICANT FU RESPONDENT IX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant purchased a [puppy] from the respondent for $2,500.00 which sadly became ill, and was put down by her vet, within 2 weeks of purchase. 2. The applicant filed a claim seeking a refund for the purchase price of the puppy ($2,500) pl...

7. [2021] NZEmpC 105 TPT Forests Ltd v Stronge [pdf, 189 KB]

   ...TPT FORESTS LIMITED v CRAIG PENFOLD [2021] NZEmpC 105 [8 July 2021] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2021] NZEmpC 105 EMPC 334/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application for search order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for access to court documents by The China Navigation Company PTE Ltd BETWEEN TPT FORESTS LIMITED First Applicant AND TPT GROUP LTD Second Ap...

8. Van Wey Lovatt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Costs) [2024] NZACC 171 (29 October 2024) [pdf, 234 KB]

   ...2024, the Court dismissed the application by Dr Van Wey Lovatt, for leave to appeal to the High Court from the Costs Decision of Judge Spiller dated 20 May 2024 (“the Application). The Accident Compensation Corporation (the Corporation) now claims costs on the Application. [2] The Corporation claims costs on a Category 2B scale in the sum of $2,674.00. Mr Evans, as counsel for the Corporation, submits that if this was an ordinary proceeding, there are factors that would have jus...

9. C Ltd v J Inc [2024] NZDT 105 (13 February 2024) [pdf, 146 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 9 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 105 APPLICANT C Ltd RESPONDENT J Inc The Tribunal orders: 1. J Inc is to pay C Ltd $30,000.00 on or before 15 March 2024. 2. The counterclaim by J Inc is dismissed. Reasons: 1. J Inc leased premises in [City] from C Ltd. J Inc ran a [restaurant] under the name ”IU” from the premises for many years. The arrangement came to an...

10. Miller-Hard v Stewart [pdf, 52 KB]

    CLAIM FILE NO: 00765 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN NICOLE ODETTE MILLER-HARD Claimant AND MELANIE GAIL STEWART First Respondent AND ROBIN LAWRENCE FORD Second Respondent AND BAY BUILDING CERTIFIERS LIMITED Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent, the TAURANGA DISTRICT COUNCIL having been struck out. AND No Fifth Respondent, GEOFFREY MORRISON having been struck out...