12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 99 APPLICANT MB APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: G Ltd Limited is to pay MB and NB the sum of $20,900.67 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 19 April 2022, the parties entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a property at [Address]. Before purchasing the proper...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 68 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT EX The Tribunal orders: EX is to pay MN the sum of $350.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 7 July 2023, MN agreed to purchase from EX a [caravan] for $26,000.00 after seeing it advertised on [website]. The parties recorded their agreement in a written signed contract...
...director of the defendant DATE OF HEARING: 29 November 2023 DATE OF DECISION: 21 May 2024 [2] NFSG only responded to the request after Mr Lochead-MacMillan complained to the Privacy Commissioner and initially withheld some of the requested personal information. Mr Lochead-MacMillan claims that NFSG interfered with his privacy by failing to comply with the requirements of the Privacy Act 1993 (the Act)2 in its response to his request. BACKGROUND [3] In late 2017...
...with the company, Mr Oldfield enclosed further authorities signed by each of the union members who were employees. (k) On 13 May 2011 Ms Gorgner wrote in reply responding to Mr Oldfield’s letter. She raised allegations of defamation. She claimed not to have seen the detachment from the membership forms even though her company, over several years, had made union fee deductions from employees’ wages on the basis of the authority contained in such detachment. 4 She raised i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1464 APPLICANT NK RESPONDENT EI Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NK took his car to EI Ltd to have the rust around the windscreen of his vehicle repaired, which needed to happen before the windscreen itself could be replaced. Some months after the job was completed, NK again needed to h...
...3 Payment 16 Fee schedule 16 Change of lawyers 16 Disbursements 16 Travel 16 Interpreters/translators 17 Payment arrangements 17 Relationship with Legal Aid 18 Court entry 18 Concurrent legal aid cases 18 Without Notice applications 18 Appendix 1 – Glossary 19 Appendix 2 – Financial Eligibility Thresholds 21 Appendix 3 – Funding Declaration Form Example 22 Appendix 4 – Family Legal Advice Service (FLAS) Stages 23 Appendix 5 – Family Legal Advice...
...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 345 APPLICANT IN RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In October 2022 IN and BI decided to register and produce a dance performance for the [the festival], which was to take place in [redacted]. No formal agreement was made, rather they started the process together as co-choreograp...
...ownership of BD and NL and they may dispose if it as they see fit. Background 1. CM Limited (“CM”) trades as ‘HD’ and is owned and operated by HI. HI is the sole shareholder and director of CM. NL and BD (together referred to as “the Applicants”) were interested in purchasing a [type] cooker for their home at [address]. They wanted a cooker that they could cook in and on top of, heat the house, and heat their hot water via a wet-back. On 23 February 2019, they met HI of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1378 APPLICANT KC Limited RESPONDENT OK The Tribunal hereby orders: On the counter-claim, KC Limited is to pay the sum of $500.00 to OK on or before 7 August 2019; and The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 26 December 2018 Mr K hired a van from KC Ltd ('KC') for 6 days. He paid a daily fee on top of...