Search Results

1. MB v NQ [2020] NZDT 1374 (30 October 2020) [pdf, 195 KB]

   ...NZDT 1374 APPLICANT MB RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NQ engaged employment advocacy firm [Firm] to act for her in an employment dispute. At the time that contract was formed MB was contracting to [Firm] and became NQ’s advocate. 2. NQ’s dispute was to go to mediation with her former employer on Monday 6 May 2019 with MB attending as her [Firm] advocate. MB rang NQ on the morning of the mediation to con...

2. Form 34 - Family legal aid - Tax invoice - Maintenance [pdf, 518 KB]

   Templates V10 – July 2016 page 1 07/16 form 34 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee Maintenance Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Provider number Name of law firm Firm number Details of claim Date latest activity completed Date of final disposition (if final invoice) Interim invoice Fin...

3. Form 34 Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee: Maintenance [pdf, 519 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 34 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fee Maintenance Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Provider number Name of law firm Firm number Details of claim Date latest activity completed Date of final disposition (if final invoice) Interim invoice F...

4. Form 30 Family Invoice Adoption [pdf, 217 KB]

   Version 19 – September 2022 page 1 09/22 form 30 Tax Invoice Family Legal Aid Fixed Fees Adoption Legal aid file no. Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Customer Lead provider Provider number Law firm Firm number Details of claim Fixed Fee: Date fixed fee(s) completed Fixed Fee Plus: Covers period from to Interim invoice Final invoice Please record...

5. UN & JI v NB Ltd [2022] NZDT 32 (23 March 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

   ...OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT LN The Tribunal orders: The claims against the three respondents are all dismissed. Reasons [1] The applicants, JI and UN, claim that the respondents failed in their respective duties to ascertain and inform them, when they purchased a property, that a part of a garage on the property encroached on neighbouring land. The first respondent, NB Ltd, represented by UN, is the real estate agency that acted for the vendor in the transaction; TD was the...

6. [2022] NZEmpC 140 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Auckland [2021] NZERA 586 at [116] (Member Larmer). 2 At [92]. (b) adding further alleged breaches of the University’s Charter and Academic Standards Policy regarding the University’s obligations in relation to equity, research-informed teaching, academic freedom, and its role as the critic and conscience of society; (c) adding allegations that Dr Wiles has been singled out by the University for alleged non-compliance with the University’s Outside Activities Po...

7. Gardiner v Gorringe (2011) 25 Waikato Maniapoto MB 83 (25 WMN 83) [pdf, 293 KB]

   ...Hearing [25] First Cause of Action: Breach of Contract – Clause 10 of the Lease – s 18(1)(d) of TTWMA [27] Second Cause of Action: Breach of Contract – Clause 8 of the Lease – s 18(1)(d) of TTWMA [50] Informal v Formal Lease? [55] Implied Term in the Formal Lease? [65] Have the Defendants Breach Clause 8 of the Lease? [71] Third Cause of Action: Injury to Māori Freehold Land – s 18(1)(c) of TTWMA [85] Claims...

8. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...Taranaki Whānui following their Treaty of Waitangi settlement with the Crown. 466 Aotea MB 167 [3] Although PNBST received the land at Shelly Bay, through a series of events it became owned by Shelly Bay Taikuru Limited (“SBTL”). SBTL was formed through the amalgamation of Shelly Bay Investments Limited and SBTL, which were and are associated with the property development company, the Wellington Company Limited. [4] The applicants are members of Taranaki Whānui and bene...

9. Marumaru v Waipakuranui Incorporation (2012) 279 Aotea MB 137 (279 AOT 137) [pdf, 294 KB]

   ...which state that “it was... resolved to authorise two family members to sign the lease of the Incorporation to the MacNab family.” [33] On 6 April 2010, counsel for the Incorporation submitted that Mr Marumaru‟s claims were vexatious and requested that the Court strike it out 2 . 1 In support of his position, Mr Bell filed the following: Copy of the Chairman‟s report for the year ending 30 June 2008, presented at...

10. [2024] NZEmpC 91 (Judgment (No 6) of Judge M S King 28 May 2024) [pdf, 323 KB]

    ...his assets out of the jurisdiction. While FRD has Chinese citizenship, his life is established and anchored in New Zealand. STU’s evidence that FRD has acted dishonestly is circumstantial and weak. FRD has complied with the disclosure of information required under the orders and he has also voluntarily provided additional information not covered by the orders. (c) The balance of convenience and interests of justice favour the application being granted. Reliance is placed on...