12520 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 348 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT BN Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In August 2019 SG Ltd purchased a new [vehicle] from B Ltd. KD was a director of the company, and later the vehicle was transferred from the company into her name. 2. In 2020 the vehicle was recalled to replace the balance shaft. S...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 364 APPLICANT JD RESPONDENT SL The Tribunal orders: SL is to pay JD the sum of $4,195.00 on or before 10 August 2023. Reasons: 1. JD’s friend, SL, was visiting [City]. JD picked SL up in her car and they decided to go for a drive. JD was tired and so asked SL to drive the car. 2. They drove to the [look out], wh...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 358 APPLICANTS TUW and TJW RESPONDENTS TX and HL The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TUW and TJW purchased [home] from TX and HL with a settlement date of 22 December 2023. Both parties confirm that the Agreement for Sale and Purchase included the spa pool as a chattel with the usual warranty that it be in w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 59 APPLICANT QC FIRST RESPONDENT APPLICANT TO COUNTER- CLAIM OC EC The Tribunal orders: The claim and counter-claim are dismissed. Reasons 1. From early 2019 OC and EC had tried to find a female [breed] puppy after the death of one of their female dogs. They tried various registered breeder...
...to an illegal strike. [3] In general terms, it was argued that the requirements of s 83(b) of the ER Act would not be met since the proposed strikes did not relate to bargaining for a collective agreement but to bargaining about a pay equity claim. [4] The application was heard on a very urgent basis on 3 March 2022, with an interlocutory judgment being issued later that day in which the injunction was granted.1 Reasons for the judgment were issued the following day.2 Amongs...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court - [2022] NZDT 103 APPLICANT GJ Limited RESPONDENT EI Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 28 August 2019, GJ Limited (the purchaser) entered into an agreement with EI Limited (the vendor) for sale and purchase of a business. The purchaser claims that it later discovered that gas bottles we...
...entitlements – ss 69(1) and 72(1), contracting out – s 299, Accident Compensation Act 2001] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 21 March 2022. The Reviewer declined jurisdiction in relation to two review applications lodged by Ms Howard. Background [2] Ms Howard was born in December 1947. At the time of her claim for cover, she was employed by New Zealand Post Ltd (NZ Post). NZ Post was an accredited employer under the Accident Co...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 448 APPLICANT CL RESPONDENT Q Ltd 2nd RESPONDENT WN The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. In January 2023, CL suffered an accident whilst on board his boat. He was washed off the back of the boat by a wave and became entangled in the boarding ladder. One of his hearing aids was...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 654 APPLICANT BS APPLICANT WQ RESPONDENT K Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT T Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT N District Council THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. K Ltd and T Ltd are to pay BS and WQ $8,000.00 on or before the 15 November 2023. 2. The claim against N District Coun...
...JACKSON NZEmpC [2017] NZEmpC 38 [5 April 2017] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2017] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 135/2016 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for access to Court documents BETWEEN EDEN GROUP LIMITED Plaintiff AND TIMOTHY NIGEL JACKSON First Defendant AND PHILLIP ANDREW KITE Second Defendant AND CHRISTOPHER JOHN BLACKMAN Thi...