Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12922 items matching your search terms

  1. DI v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 114 (10 April 2024) [pdf, 232 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 114 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. C Ltd are ordered to pay DI a sum of $1005 by 5pm on 3 May 2024. Reasons: 2. On 22 October 2023, DI was looking for holiday accommodation in [Town] over Christmas and New Year period. He used C Ltd website and found a suitable property. DI says he attempted to book...

  2. DC v KN [2023] NZDT 309 (22 May 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 309 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay DC $3,220.00 on or before 12 June 2023. Reasons 1. DC and her then partner KN, and CI signed a lease for [property], for a fixed lease until 25 June 2023. Each were to pay $230.00 per week as their share of the rent. On or about 8 February 2023, KN...

  3. [2013] NZEmpC 32 Piefection Foods Ltd v Hume [pdf, 133 KB]

    ...to provide, and it failed deliberately to attend the investigation meeting. Although it did provide written comments to the Authority prior to the investigation meeting in a number of emails, no substantial supporting evidence in documentary form was supplied, and no sworn evidence was submitted. [5] Piefection Foods Limited, through its director, Mr Andrew McEwan, did not act in good faith towards Mr Ian Hume. It refused to communicate with Mr Hume's representative, re...

  4. IW v CZ [2024] NZDT 498 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 202 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 498 APPLICANT IW RESPONDENT CZ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) KJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. IW and CZ were the drivers involved in a motor vehicle collision, citybound on the [motorway] near/just after the [suburb] on-ramp. CZ was driving in the lane to the right of IW...

  5. Rafiq v Civil Aviation Authority [2013] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 132 KB]

    ...Act 1993. The proceedings in HRRT040/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand” as defendant while the proceedings in HRRT041/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of England operating in New Zealand”. The statements of claim are, in part, almost identical. Neither are models of clarity and are difficult to follow. They have been understood as making complaints that the defendants breached: [2.1] Principle 6 of the information privacy principles in that the de...

  6. JL v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 76 (17 June 2022) [pdf, 157 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 76 APPLICANT JI RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $4312.50 to JL on or before 14 July 2022. Reasons 1. On 8 March 2021 JI entered into a contract with N Ltd (‘N Ltd’) to purchase a house and land package for which a CCC was issued on 23 June 2021, with settlement between the parties...

  7. DI & KB v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 375 (14 August 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 375 FIRST APPLICANTS DI SECOND APPLICANTS (new party) RESPONDENT KB G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. KB is added to the claim as Second Applicant. 2. The claim by DI and KB against G Ltd is dismissed. REASONS 1. DI and KB (together referred to as “the Applican...

  8. Power & Anor as Trustees of the AR Power Family Trust [pdf, 85 KB]

    ...Section 49 of the Act provides that claimants may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for review and attached information. The letter from Michelle...

  9. X Ltd v LG [2023] NZDT 358 (28 July 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 358 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: LG as trustee of LB is to pay X Ltd $6781.55 by 18 August 2023. Reasons Introduction: 1. X Ltd was contracted by LB trustees to provide forest operations and management services for the harvest of forestry at LB’s property at [address]. 2. X Ltd car...

  10. BT v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 274 (30 June 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 274 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay BT $1,469.30 on or before 14 July 2023. Reasons 1. BT purchased a [phone] online from T Ltd. He received the phone on 5 October 2022, and within a few days it was clear that the phone could not detect the pen or stylus as it was supposed to....