12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 558 APPLICANT FD RESPONDENT HO SECOND RESPONDENT MO The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. FD purchased a campervan from MO for $20,000.00 after viewing an advertisement [online] and after viewing the campervan. FD alleges MO misrepresented the capability of the campervan to negotiate steep hills. FD seeks t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 456 APPLICANT SE RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay SE $550.00 by 31 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In May 2022, SE provided entertainment services to D Ltd. D Ltd deducted bond money from each of her payments and has refused to return the bond. 2. SE attended the hearing. D Ltd did not attend. On the...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 613 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT YY The Tribunal orders: YY is to pay MM $380.00 on or before the 21st day of November 2023. Reasons: Introduction: 1. MM entered into an agreement with YY to rent a room in her boarding house at $190 per week, to be paid fortnightly. 2. On the 12th of November 2022 MM paid $380 being two week...
...was attached to information that Mr OM had sent with his complaint. [2] The complaint was not upheld by the Standards Committee. This review application was made by Mr OM who is referred to as the Applicant. [3] The background is that BAI claimed the Applicant owed it money, and when the Applicant wanted certain repairs done to machinery on his farm, BAI agreed to undertake the repair work providing that an amount of money representing its claim was paid into the trust account...
...Judgment: 15 July 2015 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT (NO 11) OF CHIEF JUDGE G L COLGAN [1] By memorandum filed on 7 July 2015 the plaintiff seeks an adjournment of the fixture of her case scheduled for 10-14 (inclusive) August 2015. Such a request should both be by interlocutory application and, in the particular circumstances of this case, by leave. [2] Essentially the plaintiff says that her case is not ready for trial and, in addition, its hearing will require more than...
...TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 197 EMPC 384/2023 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs on interlocutory applications BETWEEN ANDREW BYRNE Plaintiff AND COVERSTAFF RECRUITMENT GROUP LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: Plaintiff in person D Brabant, counsel for defendant Judgme...
...2 July 2016 Adoption Proceedings under the Adoption Act 1955 Termination of instructions Activity Fees Tasks Initial instructions not followed through $290 For Taking instructions, attending the client Preparing application for legal aid Attempting to contact the client Closing the file Reporting to client Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried th...
...2 July 2016 Adoption Proceedings under the Adoption Act 1955 Termination of instructions Activity Fees Tasks Initial instructions not followed through $290 For Taking instructions, attending the client Preparing application for legal aid Attempting to contact the client Closing the file Reporting to client Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 587 APPLICANT SD and QD RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. SD and QD purchased a motor vehicle in a private sale for $6800 from NU for their son. NU advised SD and QD that he was selling the vehicle on behalf of his parents as they had moved overseas indefinitely three months prior to
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 353 APPLICANT PR RESPONDENT Z Ltd The Tribunal orders: Z Ltd is to pay PR $7,039.08 by 30 June 2023. Reasons 1. PR claims a full refund of the fees he paid Z Ltd for his enrolment in a [Course] at its [City] campus last year. The amount PR claims is $7,821.20. 2. Z Ltd has emphasised PR did not make it clear...