Search Results

1. [2024] NZEmpC 131 Boyd v OJI [pdf, 363 KB]

   ...Fechney should contact Mr Boyd directly about the matter. [18] As a result, Ms Fechney wrote immediately to Mr Boyd, asking whether he was engaging alternative representation. If so, she would direct communications to that representative. She also requested payment of the sums which had been directed by the Authority. [19] Mr Boyd responded, stating that everything was opposed, and that a “huge claim is coming from us for everything that did happen, plus the [d]rugs that ruined...

2. LU v CE Ltd [2022] NZDT 235 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...is not established that they gave faulty advice which caused her to buy another car — in any event it was for an asset which she now owns so is not a loss. Referee Perfect Date: 30 November 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. OOJ v QD Inc [2023] NZDT 214 (20 June 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

   ...BE who apparently introduced himself as the manager of QD Inc. 2. BE entered into a contract with OOJ to run weekly poker nights at QD Inc. OOJ sent a written contract to him which was never signed but which records the details of the agreement formed, including the fees payable to OOJ. BE’s mobile phone and personal email address were recorded on the written document and that is where both the contract and the invoices were sent to. 3. The poker nights were advertised on QD In...

4. Waitangi Tribunal - District 12 Wellington District [pdf, 13 MB]

   ...13: The Northern South Island, Dr G A Phillipson \ I FOREWORD The research report that follows is one of a series of historical surveys commissioned by the Waitangi Tribunal as part of its Rangahaua Wbanui programme. In its present form, it has the status of a working paper: first release. It is published now so that claimants and other interested parties can be aware of its contents and, should they so wish, comment on them and add further information and insights. The pu...

5. Form 44 Application for contempt of enforcement proceedings [pdf, 496 KB]

   When should I use this form? This form lets you apply for a court order against the judgment debtor where they have the means to pay the judgment debt but are refusing to do so. Use this form if all the following apply: • you are the judgment creditor • the money owed in a judgment or court order has not been paid • you can show that the judgment debtor has the means to pay the debt but is refusing to do so. For example, a financial statement or financial assessment has been complet...

6. Hollis v Accident Compensation Corporation (Reviewable decision) [2025] NCACC 138 (28 August 2025) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...for payment of his independence allowance had expired on 7 November 2024. The Corporation asked Mr Hollis if he would like to receive independence allowance payments every three months ($496.08) or receive a five-year payment ($9,105). The information sheet that the Corporation enclosed explained: “If I accept the five-year payment, can I still ask for my impairment to be reassessed later? If the impact of your injury worsens, you can apply for your level of impairment to be...

7. [2017] NZEnvC 106 Wallace Group Limited v Auckland Council [pdf, 445 KB]

   ...Whether or not there had been any submitters or further submitters on the Proposed Plan who would need to be advised of the High Court Ruling and that they might become parties to the appeal; and (b) Whether or not the parties agreed with HNZ's claim to status as an interested party. [5] As already indicated, opposition was brought by the Appellant. [6] The Court called for submissions. [7] The Council having indicated that it would abide the Court's decision on the ....

8. EL v IN Ltd [2022] NZDT 149 (18 August 2022) [pdf, 165 KB]

   ...there is a legal requirement for a signature, that requirement can be met by an electronic signature under 226 of the CCLA. The electronic signature must adequately identify the signatory and adequately indicate the signatory’s approval of the information to which the signature relates; and is as reliable as is appropriate given the purpose for which, and the circumstances in which, the signature is required. 14. There was no evidence before the Tribunal of an electronic signature fr...

9. Minhinnick v The Crown - Maioro Lands (1994) 18 Waikato Maniapoto Appellate MB 220 (18 APWM 220) [pdf, 3.8 MB]

   ...Clark. At the hearing of the Court on 29 March 1993 Ngarau Tupaea presented a submission to the Court as chairman of Huakina Development Trust. It was explained that the 23 Tainui Marae/Papakainga of the Manukau Harbour and lower Waikato River formed this Trust in 1983. That Trust considered the claim of Ngati Te Ata to Maioro. In his submission Mr Tupaea stated - . We also cite the support of Nga Marae Toopu as given at Iheir last meeting of 28 February 1993, and we all stand befo...

10. BG & BG v Hakaoro [2013] NZIACDT 63 (19 September 2013) [pdf, 157 KB]

    ...were concerned about being in New Zealand unlawfully. They did not want to overstay and it appears the issue of an interim visa for the husband allowed him to avoid adverse consequences to a greater or lesser extent. This was a matter Mr Hakaoro was requested to address in the Tribunal’s Minute. He has provided no satisfactory response. Mr Hakaoro had a professional obligation to address these issues with his client at the time, explain their situation, and determine what remedial action...