Search Results

1. HB v ST [2024] NZDT 178 (29 February 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...the other. HB does not have anything in writing, such as a question answered on the [online auction site] advertisement, therefore he is not able to prove that his recollection is accurate. 6. In any event, ST did provide HB with the correct information before he took possession of the mower. ST said he was willing to cancel the deal and give HB his money back. Therefore, the contract could have been cancelled and this would mean that HB would not have suffered a loss at all. 7. I

2. MB v TX & EX [2023] NZDT 386 (16 August 2023) [pdf, 233 KB]

   ...13. The losses have been proven. Without evidence to the contrary, I accept the assessment of loss and the repair account as submitted by the insurer. Referee: K. Edwards Date: 16 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. SD v O [2023] NZDT 237 (18 August 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...than not, that O breached its duty of care by failing to ensure the maintenance of the road was carried out in accordance with its required standards. Referee: P Goddard Date: 18 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

4. BL QH v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 233 (21 June 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   ...total amount that may be ordered. Conclusion 8. For these reasons T Ltd is to pay QH and BL the sum of $3,000.00 by the date stated in the order. Referee: K Rendall Date: 21 June 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

5. GC v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 349 (11 August 2023) [pdf, 91 KB]

   ...would acquire these buds if they were acquainted with this one failure that was remediated within three weeks. For these reasons I must dismiss the claim. Referee: C Murphy Date: 11 August 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

6. SN v X Ltd [2024 NZDT 93 (23 January 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...mistakes. Further there was no evidence by SN as to how he had quantified the sums he claimed for distress and harassment. 12. SN’s claim is therefore dismissed. Referee: T Prowse Date: 23 January 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply f...

7. TG v E Ltd [2024] NZDT 647 (31 October 2024) [pdf, 168 KB]

   ...through no fault of her own, she has not established any basis for E Ltd to be legally liable for the damage. The claim must therefore be dismissed. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 31 October 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. KD v BN Ltd [2024] NZDT 348 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...removed from the companies register on 11 October 2023. KD however, said that she still received warrant of fitness reminder notices from BN Ltd and when she had her car serviced as part of the servicing warranty package, it was BN Ltd who freely performed that service. It had obtained the client list from B Ltd, and it appeared to the consumer that it was standing the in the shoes of B Ltd. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 6. NN and ES, representing BN Ltd, agreed that BN Ltd...

9. NE v Accident Compensation Corporation (Claims Process) [2025] NZACC 023 (4 February 2025) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...allocated to determine those reviews, and they were scheduled for hearing at a rate of one hearing per week, to around July 2023. [4] In September 2022, after the Reviewer had dismissed a number of reviews by the appellant, she began to make requests for a change of Reviewer, alleging that the allocated Reviewer was biased against her. From 21 September 2022, the Reviewer considered and declined each of these requests, determining that the grounds for recusal were not met. [5]...

10. BH v M Ltd [2025] NZDT 7 (13 January 2025) [pdf, 214 KB]

    ...have M Ltd revisit the house. The quote is from a qualified plumber, I find that it is reasonable and order that M Ltd is to pay BH $431.25. Referee: C D Boys Date: 13 January 2025 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe