12520 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 473 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT AB APPLICANT'S INSURER X Ltd The Tribunal orders: AB is to pay the sum of $30,000.00 to X Ltd on or before Friday 6 October 2023. Reasons: 1. On 5 May 2022, there was a collision between D Ltd’s [vehicle 1], driven by its director BM, and a [vehicle 2]. Both vehicles were usi...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 206 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT CE SECOND RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against CE is dismissed. 2. D Limited is to pay $26,081.92 to TU by 1 July 2023. 3. Immediately following payment of the $26,081.92, D Ltd will own the solar panels it supplied to TU and by arrangement m...
...(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1607 APPLICANT DD & TU RESPONDENT BM The Tribunal orders: BM is to pay DD and TU $2,000.00 within 28 days. Reasons [1] The applicants, DD and TU, bought a [Vehicle] via Trademe from BM. The applicants claim that BM misled them about the condition of the vehicle, and they claim the cost of remedying a defect which, they say, should have been disclosed to them at the ti...
...result, KX has brought a claim against T Ltd for breaches of the Consumer Guarantees Act 1993, in particular that the stick was not fit for purpose. She seeks a refund of the purchase price of the hockey stick; $199. Issues 5. to resolve this application, I must consider; a. hat guarantees apply to sporting equipment such as the hockey stick? b. Was the stick fit for purpose? Guarantees 6. The Consumer Guarantee Act 1993 (CGA) implies guarantees into consumer contract...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 211 APPLICANT K Ltd RESPONDENT SG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] T Ltd contracted in 2016 to provide telephone services to a company, U Ltd, of which SG was a director. The company was removed some three years later from the Companies Register, and T Ltd continued to provide services for some t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1663 APPLICANT BK APPLICANT DU Ltd APPLICANT WL RESPONDENT UX Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by BK, WL and DU Ltd as trustees for [the trust] against UX Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr X of UX Ltd (“UX Ltd”) had acted as lawyer for BK and his trusts for a number of years. As part of a pro...
...REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 87 [9 June 2014] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND REGISTRY [2014] NZEmpC 87 ARC 56/13 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to amend statement of claim BETWEEN SHIRLEY ANNE MACDONALD Plaintiff AND WHALE PUMPS LIMITED T/A DENBY CATERERS Defendant Hearing: On the memoranda, affidavits and submissions of t...
...determination, which he received later that day and which he copied to Mr Gilbert. [8] Mr Gilbert then informed the respondent’s counsel and the Employment Court Registry, by close of business on 11 June 2010, of his intention to file a statement of claim and sought a 7 day extension of time for this purpose. The reason for this extension was said to be that, despite earlier requests for the determination to be sent by email, he had not received a copy of the determination until...
...2014) Appearances: plaintiff in person A Shaw, counsel for the defendant G Slevin, counsel for Official Assignee Judgment: 11 November 2014 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL Introduction [1] This judgment decides two applications. The first is made by the defendant. The orders it seeks are: (a) That the remedies sought by the plaintiff in paras 55(a), (c) and (d) of his fourth amended statement of claim be dismissed on the basis that these remedie...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2019] NZEmpC 39 EMPC 250/2017 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out part of the proceedings BETWEEN GEORGINA RACHELLE Plaintiff AND AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Rachelle, plaintiff in person P...