Search Results

1. [2021] NZACC 9 - Stryder v ACC (12 January 2021) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...Injury ss 26(1)(c) 32 and 33 Accident Compensation Act 2001] ____________________________________________________________________ [1] At issue on this appeal is a decision by the Corporation on 28 April 2017 in which it declined Mr Stryder’s claim for cover for a treatment injury. Background [2] Mr Stryder has cover for a previous lumbar and ligament sprain sustained on 16 April 2014 when he injured his lower back lifting a tandem trailer. [3] He was referred to Grahame Ingl...

2. [2021] NZACC 114 - Stalmann v ACC (3 August 2021) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...by her in early September 2008. She was treated by her general practitioner and also Palmerston North Hospital. [2] Two primary decisions issued by the respondent are the subject of this appeal: • A decision dated 21 August 2015 declining a claim for cover for treatment injury for peritoneal adhesions. • A decision dated 26 May 2016 declining a claim for cover for treatment injury for peritoneal adhesions resulting in bowel obstruction caused by a delay in diagnosis...

3. Form 26 Fixed Fees H-I [pdf, 269 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 26 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim...

4. Form 26 Fixed Fees H-I [pdf, 421 KB]

   Templates V12 – August 2017 page 1 08/17 form 26 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Fixed Fees Schedules H & I Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. Charges/CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Provider number Firm number Court type Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Details of claim...

5. N Ltd v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 177 (11 April 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...16 April 2023. 5. In October 2023, KN was contacted by H Ltd in relation to money claimed to be owed by N Ltd to Q Ltd. This was the first time KN became aware of the breach notice and associated fees. 6. KN immediately contacted Q Ltd and requested that the late fees be waived. He indicated he was willing to pay the original fine. Q Ltd did not agree to KN’s request to waive any late fees. 7. N Ltd filed a claim with the Disputes Tribunal. It is seeking an order that it is...

6. OP v U Ltd & B Ltd [2024] NZDT 823 (15 October 2024) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...there was no written agreement for storage. B Ltd accepted that no written documentation was given to OP at the time of entry into the arrangement and that no terms and conditions were given to OP at that time. Particularly, OP was not given the information that B Ltd considered it had the ability to sell OP’s property for non-payment. I do not consider that B Ltd has been able to establish on the balance of probabilities that there was a term in the contract to this effect. 9. The...

7. [2011] NZEmpC 9 Naturex Limited v Rogers [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...settlement conference although the Court has been reluctant to award the costs of mediation under the Employment Relations Act 2000. [21] Judge Shaw went on to note: [16] In Simpson v BB’s New Zealand Ltd, 12 the High Court agreed that a request for costs of a judicial settlement conference was novel. It noted that such conferences are not included in the schedule of costs in the High Court Rules and held that this was a deliberate policy to encourage parties to attend an...

8. [2011] NZEmpC 109 Evolution E Business Limited v Smith [pdf, 229 KB]

   ...plaintiff Defendant in person assisted by Mr Brian Smith JP Judgment: 26 August 2011 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A D FORD Introduction [1] In this proceeding, the plaintiff (Evolution) seeks an award of damages and other relief against its former employee, Mr Benjamin Smith, for alleged breaches of his employment agreement, in particular, alleged breaches of his duties of good faith and confidentiality. The principal allegation made against Mr Smith is that during the course o...

9. LL & TM v I Ltd & TE [2023] NZDT 730 (7 December 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...additional $3,450.00 and, when they did not pay that sum, refusing to lower the house onto the new piles. [11] TE said that he had been initially aware that the obtaining of the building consent might take some time. He said that the applicants had informed him that the building consent had been issued in December 2022 and he had subsequently gone to the site on 1 and 2 February and placed the house on metal stands to enable the piling work to be done. His expectation was that the pili...

10. MB v NQ [2020] NZDT 1374 (30 October 2020) [pdf, 195 KB]

    ...NZDT 1374 APPLICANT MB RESPONDENT NQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NQ engaged employment advocacy firm [Firm] to act for her in an employment dispute. At the time that contract was formed MB was contracting to [Firm] and became NQ’s advocate. 2. NQ’s dispute was to go to mediation with her former employer on Monday 6 May 2019 with MB attending as her [Firm] advocate. MB rang NQ on the morning of the mediation to con...