12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 273 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT EE The Tribunal orders: EE is to pay to BL the amount of $5,415.00. Payment is to be made on or before 20 April 2024. Reasons 1. BL and EE entered a relationship from 29 September 2022 until 24 October 2022. In January, February and March 2023 EE reached out to BL asking for mone...
...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 4/2019 EMPC 360/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN ANA SHAW Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: SR Mitchell, counsel for plaintiff M Beech and CL McGregor, coun...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 604 APPLICANT Z Ltd RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by Z Ltd against P Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In or about August 2020, P Ltd undertook gas fitting and plumbing work (“the work”) at the premises of Z Ltd at [Address] (“the premises”). The work was completed in August/September 2020 and an invoice was...
...complaint is succinctly set out at the commencement of the Committee’s decision of 25 November 2019. 2 [3] I repeat that brief summary here:1 [1] In early 2011 Ms [SC] instructed Ms [KB] on behalf of her family to advance a Treaty of Waitangi claim. [2] Legal aid funding was initially granted, and Mr [ZR] was the Lead Provider for a period. Mr [ZR] ceased practising in 2013 at which point he was appointed a [redacted] judge.2 [3] In around 2015 Ms [SC] complained about Ms [K...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 469 APPLICANT DZ FIRST RESPONDENT LU SECOND RESPONDENT IW Ltd The Tribunal orders: IW Ltd is to pay $3071.55 to DZ on or before 2 July 2024; and The claim against LU is dismissed. Reasons 1. IW Ltd was the lessee in a commercial property owned by DZ. In late 2022, IW Ltd sold its business and the lease was assign...
...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 103 EMPC 85/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to access Court documents BETWEEN SERENITY PILGRIM, ANNA COURAGE, ROSE STANDTRUE, CRYSTAL LOYAL, PEARL VALOR AND VIRGINIA COURAGE Plaintiffs AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SUED ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 709 APPLICANT BX RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: W Ltd is to pay directly to BX the sum of $3,078.72 on or before Wednesday, 31 January 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. The parties agree the respondent in this matter is as above. The respondent...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out o...
...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 41 EMPC 289/2018 EMPC 323/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings BETWEEN RENAISSANCE ASSETS MANAGEMENT LIMITED Plaintiff AND JINQI GE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Pollak, counsel for plaintiff J Moor...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 405 APPLICANT BK & KK as trustees of X Family Trust RESPONDEN T Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay KK and BK $5,345.44 within 28 days; and within 28 days of making the payment of $5,345.44 to KK and BK, Q Ltd must remove the [water pump], the subject of this dispute, from the K property at a time to be arranged with KK and BK....