Search Results

1. [2012] NZEmpC 85 Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd [pdf, 46 KB]

   ...plaintiff in his amended statement of claim filed on 28 October 2011. The plaintiff’s de novo challenge is a defended matter and therefore requires a directions conference and the allocation of a fixture to deal with it. [3] If the plaintiff’s application amounted to a request for judgment by default it must therefore be dismissed. [4] The defendant has filed a memorandum accepting the plaintiff’s request that the directions conference take place with the plaintiff, i...

2. Family Fixed Fees Schedules July 2020 updated 28 October 22 [pdf, 482 KB]

   ...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity Fe...

3. [2013] NZEmpC 141 2Air NZ Ltd v Kerr [pdf, 88 KB]

   ...NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 [26 July 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 141 ARC 38/13 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for further disclosure, an application for leave to extend time to file briefs in reply, an application for leave to file an amended statement of claim BETWEEN AIR NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Plaintiff AND GRANT KERR...

4. BC v KQ & EQ [2024] NZDT 146 (15 April 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 146 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT KQ SECOND RESPONDENT EQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BC previously travelled through New Zealand. In June 2023, before departing New Zealand, BC sold a car to KQ. BC and KQ agreed a price of $4,900.00 and details of a [Money Services transmitte...

5. BG v TQ Ltd [2023] NZDT 145 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 145 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT TQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: BG is to pay TQ Ltd $63.50 on or before 11 August 2023. Reasons: 1. BG received a parking breach notice charging her $65.00 by TQ Ltd (TQ LTD) for parking her car in the [mall] for 26 minutes without paying for her parking. BG has paid $1.50 to TQ LTD which...

6. LT v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 723 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

7. EN v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 726 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

8. LD v LT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1579 (12 August 2021) [pdf, 174 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1579 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT LT Ltd The Tribunal orders: LT Ltd is to pay LD $782 by no later than Thursday 2 September 2021. Reasons: 1. LD is suing LT Ltd for $7,976.00 in connection with the supply and installation of kitchen cabinetry. LD claims a worker for the company damaged her dining table during the inst...

9. KN v ID Inc [2021] NZDT 1527 (13 August 2021) [pdf, 216 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1527 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT ID Inc SECOND RESPONDENT XI Corp The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 2 May 2021 KN’s vehicle was parked in the car park adjacent to the [City] Stadium (the turf). A ball hit on the turf, flew over the fence and damaged KN’s vehicle. 2. KN...

10. GC v U New Zealand [2024] NZDT 280 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 280 APPLICANT GC RESPONDENT U New Zealand The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GC purchased a new [electric vehicle] in late 2022. In 2023, after the vehicle had done 27,000 kms, GC discovered a puncture in the back left tyre. As a large stone had penetrated the tyre, it could not be repaired. U New Zealand fitte...