Search Results

1. I Ltd v XN [2023] NZDT 192 (18 April 2023) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Did the parties enter into an agreement that I Ltd would purchase XN’s damaged vehicle on the understanding that it would receive either the insurance pay out for the vehicle, or the insurer would perform the repairs? (b) If not, has XN been unjustly enriched by I Ltd repaying in full the finance for the vehicle? (c) What loss can I Ltd prove it has incurred that it is entitled to be compensated for? Did the parties enter into an agr...

2. CL v TU [2024] NZDT 82 (1 February 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...unfortunate instance where a company goes into liquidation leaving customers and other debtors without a remedy. 21. For these reasons the claim is dismissed. Referee: L Trevelyan Date: 1 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply fo...

3. TN v KM [2024] NZDT 696 (29 November 2024) [pdf, 187 KB]

   ...able to be awarded these costs. 19. In total, I find that TN is entitled to be paid $1,597.50 by KM. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Referee: S Simmonds Date: 29 November 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

4. BG v KN [2024] NZDT 691 (4 November 2024) [pdf, 136 KB]

   ...as I have found in KN’s favour on the underlying debt, there would be no sensible basis upon which she could be liable for the debt collection costs. Referee: S Simmonds Date: 4 November 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. BN v ZJ & H Ltd [2025] NZDT 78 (10 March 2025) [pdf, 155 KB]

   ...mounting a kerb and an embankment. The repairs are detailed and are consistent with the damage and for these reasons I find the amount claimed of $3706.68 is reasonable. Referee: C Murphy Date: 10 March 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

6. LS v V Ltd [2025] NZDT 190 (1 May 2025) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...the Employment Relations Act 2000). In this case I am obliged to follow the law in this case (being the contractual arrangement between the parties). G Jaduram Disputes Tribunal Referee 01 May 2025 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2011] NZLCDT 3 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...particular relating to a family trust was concerned, the simple act of Mr Parlane producing relevant documents and explanations to the Standards Committee at an early stage of its investigation would likely have meant this particular would not have formed part of the charge the committee said; [c] It was also submitted that Mr Parlane adopted an obstructive attitude in dealing with counsel for the Standards Committee, refusing to enter discussion or to correspond in a constructive w...

8. C Ltd & D Ltd v TR [2023] NZDT 464 (22 August 2023) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...2021. 5. In September 2021 emails and phone calls between B Ltd’s salesperson, NI, and TR were exchanged – B Ltd advised that ‘your pool is in stock’ and that an installation date was planned for the end of October. In early October NI informed TR of price increases and sent a document with revised prices, which TR reluctantly agreed to, communicating that the increase was disputed and writing “without prejudice” next to her signature on the updated contract. CI030...

9. NE v BO & TH [2025] NZDT 126 (10 March 2025) [pdf, 315 KB]

   ...for egress, and about seven double trailered truckloads of logs were extracted, the majority of which were the neighbours, with the balance NE’s. Parts of the old wire fencing was also removed. The existence and extent of any fencing agreement(s) forms the initial parts of the claim. The first concerning removal and restoration of the initial 5-10 metres is largely uncontested. However, TH disputes the existence of a second agreement concerning removal of a further 50 m of fencing. In ad...

10. [2020] NZEmpC 74 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association Inc v Secretary for Education [pdf, 237 KB]

    ...these differences between part-time and full-time teachers in the STCA gives rise to unlawful discrimination. In the proceeding the claim was that part-time teachers in secondary schools are paid less than full-time teachers even though they perform essentially the same work. The plaintiffs’ third amended statement of claim alleged that the STCA was therefore discriminatory and breached the Equal Pay Act 1972 (EPA), the Government Service Equal Pay Act 1960 (GSEPA) and/or the...