12519 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 200 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT GG Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. GG Ltd is to pay BL $1479.95 on or before 23 December 2022. 2. Payment is to be by way of direct credit to [account number]. Reasons: 1. BL joined GG Ltd on 10 December 2021 and paid $2330.00 for a one-year membership. She says she joined this gym because...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 597 APPLICANT NC Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT TE SECOND RESPONDENT HE The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. TE and HE entered into a residential building contract with NC Ltd – the contract was for a fixed price of $267,652.89. 2. During the course of the building work, variations to the scope occurred f...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1433 APPLICANT NN RESPONDENT TU Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: TU Ltd is to pay the sum of $306.58 directly to NN on or before 14 March 2019. Reasons 1. NN parked at a pay and display carparking site monitored by TU Ltd in December 2018. She purchased a ticket for three hours and placed it on her dashboard....
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 340 APPLICANT NP RESPONDENT KM The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim for refund of the purchase price of the saddle is dismissed. 2. KM will arrange for the return of the saddle to NP by no later than 10 July 2023. KM and NP will share equally in the (reasonable) costs of returning the saddle (as set out in paragraph 19 below). Background 1. The...
...ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 57 EMPC 127/2018 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN CORNISH TRUCK & VAN LIMITED Plaintiff AND BURGERT GILDENHUYS Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: M McGoldrick, counsel for plaintiff D Vinnicombe, a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1409 APPLICANT KD RESPONDENT SS The Tribunal orders: KD’s claim against SS is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 11 September 2020, KD emailed a notice that he wanted to build a fence between his property and the neighbouring properties. He emailed a fencing notice to SS and NS (the respondents) notifying them of his int...
...care agreements in the best interests of their children. • FDR Preparation for Mediation: a service to which people may be referred to, helping people manage their feelings and focus on their children for effective participation in FDR. Most CoCA applicants to the Family Court are required2 to attend PTS and attempt to resolve their disputes via FDR before court entry. FLAS, FDR, and Preparation for Mediation are free for those who meet the income eligibility threshold. Information...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1704 APPLICANT TQ and IQ RESPONDENT ZC The Tribunal orders: ZC is to pay the sum of $1634.00 to TQ and IQ on or before 11 January 2022. Reasons 1. TQ and IQ as vendors and ZC as the purchaser entered into a sale and purchase agreement for a property, for which the original settlement date of 31 August 2021 was def
...ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED v BRIAR LECKIE [2020] NZEmpC 132 [25 August 2020] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 132 EMPC 244/2020 IN THE MATTER OF an application to extend time to file a challenge BETWEEN ALLIANCE GROUP LIMITED Applicant AND BRIAR LECKIE Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: P Chemis, counsel for applicant R Donne...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 12 APPLICANT QH RESPONDENT TU Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT LQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QH is claiming for a refund of an amount charged by TU Ltd for towing her vehicle from [Address 1] to their yard in [Address 2]. 2. QH states she parked in a parking are...