12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 450 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT QN SECOND RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: The claim against QN and DN is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. QN has a painting business that he and EN work at for a week or two per month. When working for the business, EN is paid for his work. 2. In August of 20...
...LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2012] NZEmpC 14 [7 February 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2012] NZEmpC 14 ARC 54/11 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for extension of time BETWEEN WILSON KIM Plaintiff AND THERMOSASH COMMERCIAL LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 3 February 2012 (Heard at Auckland) Counsel: Plaintiff in person J Douglas, counsel for defenda...
...____________________________________________________________________ [1] The primary issue in this appeal is whether the reviewers were wrong to find that there were no reviewable decisions in respect of review numbers 6540240, 6599693, 6596703. A related issue is whether the appellant has a valid claim for cover for his right eye injury, and if so whether ACC has failed to make a decision on that claim within the statutory time frame. ACR 119/20 Background [2] Mr O’Neill h...
...otherwise. If you have any questions about the fees in this document, then please email feechanges@justice.govt.nz mailto:feechanges@justice.govt.nz Court fees Supreme Court Current rate (inc GST) New rate (inc GST) Filing an application for leave to appeal $1,100 $1,430 Filing an interlocutory application, unless in the case of an application for a review of a Registrar’s decision $400 $520 Scheduling the hearing date for an appeal and hearing an appeal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 707 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: NU is to pay TC $759.00 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons [1] TC claims from NU the cost of removing a large tree branch from his, TC’s, driveway. The branch had fallen from a tree on the neighbouring property, owned by NU. [2] TC said that on the morning of Wednesday 15 Oc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 171 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay EM $1,500 by 6 July 2023 Reasons 1. EM claims a refund of the $1,500 deposit he paid S Ltd which was retained after he cancelled his order for wedding flowers and rental decorations. He also asks for his $45 filing fee and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 40 APPLICANT CK APPLICANT NK RESPONDENT BG SECOND RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: 1. HG is joined to the claim as second respondent. 2. BG and HG are to pay CK and NK $1,559.79 by Friday 10 November 2023. Reasons: 1. CK and NK and BG and HG, all attended the hearing by teleconference. 2. Desp...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 474 APPLICANT DF RESPONDENT QT The Tribunal orders: QT is to pay DF $3,785.00 by 5 July 2024. Background 1. DF and QT are neighbours. DF is a permanent resident in [Town]. She and her husband have lived at [address 1] for many years. QT and EJ own [address 2]. They purchased the property several years ago and use it as a holi...
For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals The Human Rights Review Tribunal Page 1 For more information visit www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals HRRT 06/09 - 4 Office use only: HRRT NoStatement of Reply What is this form for? Use this form if you are a named as a defendant in a ‘Statement of Claim’ and wish to file a ‘Statement of Reply’ in response to the allegations made against you. Important Information 1. Please print in CAPITAL LETTERS 2. It is important tha...
...Act 1993 they contend that AMI failed to respond to their requests in a manner that complied with AMI’s responsibilities as an agency under the Privacy Act. Background [3] The fire occurred at the Lochead-MacMillan home on 9 January 2010. The claims on the house and household contents policies were notified to AMI the following day. On 22 January 2010 AMI engaged VFR Consulting Limited (VFR) to carry out initial investigations regarding the circumstances of the fire. Mr Neil McKa...