Search Results

1. [2020] NZEmpC 74 New Zealand Post Primary Teachers’ Association Inc v Secretary for Education [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...these differences between part-time and full-time teachers in the STCA gives rise to unlawful discrimination. In the proceeding the claim was that part-time teachers in secondary schools are paid less than full-time teachers even though they perform essentially the same work. The plaintiffs’ third amended statement of claim alleged that the STCA was therefore discriminatory and breached the Equal Pay Act 1972 (EPA), the Government Service Equal Pay Act 1960 (GSEPA) and/or the...

2. Putman v Jenmark Homes Ltd [pdf, 230 KB]

   ...opinion prior to the commencement of the hearing. 2.5. The respondents joined to the adjudication by us were B W Lee Housecheck Limited, Brent Lee and Tony Heron. 00026 Determination 5 2.6. During the course of the process we were requested to, and did, issue witness summonses pursuant to clauses 8 and 9 of the Schedule to the WHRS Act to Stan Bloxham (at the request of the claimants) and Philip O'Sullivan (at the request of the first respondent, Jenmark Homes (...

3. Waikato Bay of Plenty Standards Committee v Parlane [2011] NZLCDT 3 [pdf, 125 KB]

   ...particular relating to a family trust was concerned, the simple act of Mr Parlane producing relevant documents and explanations to the Standards Committee at an early stage of its investigation would likely have meant this particular would not have formed part of the charge the committee said; [c] It was also submitted that Mr Parlane adopted an obstructive attitude in dealing with counsel for the Standards Committee, refusing to enter discussion or to correspond in a constructive w...

4. C Ltd & D Ltd v TR [2023] NZDT 464 (22 August 2023) [pdf, 237 KB]

   ...2021. 5. In September 2021 emails and phone calls between B Ltd’s salesperson, NI, and TR were exchanged – B Ltd advised that ‘your pool is in stock’ and that an installation date was planned for the end of October. In early October NI informed TR of price increases and sent a document with revised prices, which TR reluctantly agreed to, communicating that the increase was disputed and writing “without prejudice” next to her signature on the updated contract. CI030...

5. DT Notice of appeal to District Court [pdf, 392 KB]

   DT NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT – 29/05/2024 Notice of appeal to District Court DISPUTES TRIBUNAL Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS • Use a black pen or blue pen to complete this form • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise Payment information The fee for filing an appeal is $260. You can pay the fee in person when you are handing your application in over the counter. Other costs can be incurred going thro...

6. DT-Notice-of-appeal-to-District-Court-v2.pdf [pdf, 254 KB]

   DT NOTICE OF APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT – 01/07/2025 Notice of appeal to District Court DISPUTES TRIBUNAL Completing this form • Print clearly in CAPITALS • Use a black pen or blue pen to complete this form • Answer every question on the form unless the instructions tell you otherwise Payment information The fee for filing an appeal is $269. You can pay the fee in person when you are handing your application in over the counter. Other costs can be incurred going thro...

7. Taylor v Corrections (No. 2) [2018] NZHRRT 43 [pdf, 323 KB]

   ...the Offender Notes, the PC.01 forms and the record of calls to the prison inspectorate’s 0800 complaints line were necessary to respond to the wide-ranging and unparticularised assertions made by Mr Taylor in his brief of evidence. Mr Taylor had claimed: [22.1] He had asked D Block staff “at least twice” to pass on requests for information as to what was happening with his request. [22.2] He had made it clear to D Block staff he “still required the recording”. He also “ma...

8. Lee v Whangarei District Council & Ors [2013] NZWHT Auckland 5 [pdf, 154 KB]

   Page | 1 IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2010-100-000017 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 5 BETWEEN OLIVIA LEE Claimant AND WHANGAREI DISTRICT COUNCIL First Respondent AND K J FUNG Second Respondent AND ALTHERM ALUMINIUM NORTHLAND LIMITED Third Respondent AND NORTHLAND WATERPROOFING SOLUTIONS LIMITED Fourth Respondent AND DESIGN METAL ROOFING LIMITED Fifth Respondent DETERMINATION Dated 7 March 2013 Page | 2 CONTENTS

9. Q Ltd v WO [2024] NZDT 221 (26 March 2024) [pdf, 197 KB]

   ...Reasons: 1. At the request of the landlord BN, in June 2021 WO trading as AC engaged Q Ltd (the company) to oversee the interior fit out of its retail unit AC Restaurant, to help the work proceed faster. The construction work itself was performed by the main contractor CD. 2. Q Ltd (the company) claims $29,431.00 for the following 5 unpaid invoices for October 2021 – February 2022: a. October 2021 - $2,423.92 b. November 2021 - $9,740.95 c. December 2021 - $1,987.20 d. J

10. NE v BO & TH [2025] NZDT 126 (10 March 2025) [pdf, 315 KB]

    ...for egress, and about seven double trailered truckloads of logs were extracted, the majority of which were the neighbours, with the balance NE’s. Parts of the old wire fencing was also removed. The existence and extent of any fencing agreement(s) forms the initial parts of the claim. The first concerning removal and restoration of the initial 5-10 metres is largely uncontested. However, TH disputes the existence of a second agreement concerning removal of a further 50 m of fencing. In ad...