Search Results

1. SG v UT [2023] NZDT 78 (1 March 2023) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...a total of $86.00. This sum is also allowed. 11) The applicant is awarded the total of the sums referred to in paragraphs 8-10 above. This is $1,476.00. Referee: GP Rossiter Date: 1 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

2. FN v Y Ltd [2024] NZDT 58 (12 February 2024) [pdf, 146 KB]

   ...Can FN get a refund of her $90.00 Disputes Tribunal filing fee? 15. The Tribunal has no ability to refund the filing fee. This claim is dismissed. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 12 February 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

3. AX & KX v WB [2023] NZDT 246 (20 April 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...Conclusion 14. For these reasons, I have concluded on the balance of probabilities that WB is to pay to AX and BX the sum of $637.23. Referee: J Robertshawe Date: 20 April 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe

4. S Ltd v LB [2023] NZDT 207 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. The order is to be emailed to J Ltd. Reasons: 3. The matter has previously been part heard and adjourned for LB to inform his insurer of the claim. Today LB did not answer the Referee’s call and he has not attended the hearing which proceeded in his absence. The claim will be determined on the evidence before the Tribunal today. 4. IV drove around anothe...

5. D Ltd v AB [2023] NZDT 473 (15 September 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

   ...the Tribunal’s $30,000.00 limit. 11. I therefore conclude that AB is liable to pay $30,000.00 in compensation for the damage to the [vehicle 1]. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 15 September 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

6. BL v R Ltd & U Ltd [2024] NZDT 865 (15 August 2024) [pdf, 96 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312810#DLM312810 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312813#DLM312813 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312816#DLM312816 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was n...

7. AODT-Court-Operational-Policy-update-2023-v2.pdf [pdf, 367 KB]

   ...depending on the numbers of appearances. A 'whole day' in AODT Court is calculated on attendance at the Court for at least 8.5 hours. If the Court day is actually shorter than 8.5 hours, that should be reflected in a lesser time recorded and claimed on the 'Record of attendance/ invoice' form. • attendance at any whānau hui, which are required on occasion at the direction of the presiding judge • other attendances or preparation if required between court sit...

8. Departmental Disclosure Statement: Canterbury Earthquakes Insurance Tribunal Bill [pdf, 313 KB]

   ...to access the formal court record relating to a civil proceeding. The parties to a proceeding and their lawyers may search, inspect or copy any part of the court file, under the supervision of the Registrar. Any other person may provide a written request to the court to access court documents. It is up to the tribunal to determine whether to grant a request for access. 3.5.1. Was the Privacy Commissioner consulted about these provisions? NO The Bill’s provisions on the storag...

9. [2023] NZEmpC 209 Osborne v Callaghan Innovation [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...of claim calls on the Court to consider exercising its inherent powers. Conclusion [47] The Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the second, fourth and fifth causes of action inclusive and they are struck off. [48] The Registrar is requested to arrange a telephone directions conference with the parties to deal with the remaining issues. [49] Costs are reserved. If they cannot be agreed memorandum may be filed. K G Smith Judge Judgment...

10. [2015] NZEmpC 194 Tuala v Linfox Logistics (N.Z.) Ltd [pdf, 122 KB]

    ...[envisaged] by the Court of Appeal. [53] The reality of the situation, however, as was the case with Ms MacDonald, is that if security for costs is ordered, Mr Tuala's challenge will go no further. Indeed, Linfox's application specifically requests the inclusion of a provision in any security for costs order striking out the proceeding if the security ordered is not given by a specified date. In McLachlan the Court of Appeal made it clear that an order having that effect...