12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 99 APPLICANT MB APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: G Ltd Limited is to pay MB and NB the sum of $20,900.67 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 19 April 2022, the parties entered into a contract for the sale and purchase of a property at [Address]. Before purchasing the proper...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 68 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT EX The Tribunal orders: EX is to pay MN the sum of $350.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. On 7 July 2023, MN agreed to purchase from EX a [caravan] for $26,000.00 after seeing it advertised on [website]. The parties recorded their agreement in a written signed contract...
...with the company, Mr Oldfield enclosed further authorities signed by each of the union members who were employees. (k) On 13 May 2011 Ms Gorgner wrote in reply responding to Mr Oldfield’s letter. She raised allegations of defamation. She claimed not to have seen the detachment from the membership forms even though her company, over several years, had made union fee deductions from employees’ wages on the basis of the authority contained in such detachment. 4 She raised i...
...ownership of BD and NL and they may dispose if it as they see fit. Background 1. CM Limited (“CM”) trades as ‘HD’ and is owned and operated by HI. HI is the sole shareholder and director of CM. NL and BD (together referred to as “the Applicants”) were interested in purchasing a [type] cooker for their home at [address]. They wanted a cooker that they could cook in and on top of, heat the house, and heat their hot water via a wet-back. On 23 February 2019, they met HI of...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 124 APPLICANT QD RESPONDENT TS The Tribunal orders: The application is struck out. Summary of Reasons: [1] The applicant appeared at hearing and confirmed that he was seeking reimbursement of money he claims he paid for immigration services on the respondent’s behalf. The applicant also confirmed that he was the respondent’s employer...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 689 APPLICANT G Transport Ltd RESPONDENT D Autos Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Autos is to pay directly to G Transport the sum of $10,275.76 on or before 31 January 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. [2] The applicant seeks a refund of a $10,275.76 deposit...
...APPLICANT BM APPLICANT KM RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: L Ltd is ordered to pay BM and KM the sum of $30,000.00. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 21 June 2024. Reasons: 1) In 2022 the applicants arranged for the respondent to remove their existing driveway and replace that. The applicants say that “within days of the new driveway being laid large parts of it failed.” The respondent returned and replaced about 2/3 of the dr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 345 APPLICANT IN RESPONDENT BI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In October 2022 IN and BI decided to register and produce a dance performance for the [the festival], which was to take place in [redacted]. No formal agreement was made, rather they started the process together as co-choreograp...
...MB 15 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND WAIĀRIKI DISTRICT A20140007968 CJ 2014/11 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Rangatira A No 96 BETWEEN EUNICE MAATA WHAREHINGA Applicant AND CODY WIREMU HENRY Respondent Hearing: 20 March 2015 (Heard at Wellington) Judgment: 20 March 2019 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF CHIEF JUDGE W W ISAAC 2019 Chi...
...Taking instructions, attending the client • Preparing application for legal aid • Attempting to contact the client • Closing the file • Reporting to client • Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried through and the file is closed prior to the completion of stage one of any proceedings. It cannot be claimed in conjunction with any other schedule. Application(s)/Order(s) Activity...