[2015] NZEmpC 194 Tuala v Linfox Logistics (N.Z.) Ltd [pdf, 122 KB]
...[envisaged] by the Court of Appeal. [53] The reality of the situation, however, as was the case with Ms MacDonald, is that if security for costs is ordered, Mr Tuala's challenge will go no further. Indeed, Linfox's application specifically requests the inclusion of a provision in any security for costs order striking out the proceeding if the security ordered is not given by a specified date. In McLachlan the Court of Appeal made it clear that an order having that effect...