12515 items matching your search terms
...2 July 2016 Adoption Proceedings under the Adoption Act 1955 Termination of instructions Activity Fees Tasks Initial instructions not followed through $290 For Taking instructions, attending the client Preparing application for legal aid Attempting to contact the client Closing the file Reporting to client Reporting to and invoicing Ministry of Justice Note: This fee can only be claimed where initial instructions are not carried th...
...to provide, and it failed deliberately to attend the investigation meeting. Although it did provide written comments to the Authority prior to the investigation meeting in a number of emails, no substantial supporting evidence in documentary form was supplied, and no sworn evidence was submitted. [5] Piefection Foods Limited, through its director, Mr Andrew McEwan, did not act in good faith towards Mr Ian Hume. It refused to communicate with Mr Hume's representative, re...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 498 APPLICANT IW RESPONDENT CZ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) KJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. IW and CZ were the drivers involved in a motor vehicle collision, citybound on the [motorway] near/just after the [suburb] on-ramp. CZ was driving in the lane to the right of IW...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 375 FIRST APPLICANTS DI SECOND APPLICANTS (new party) RESPONDENT KB G Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. KB is added to the claim as Second Applicant. 2. The claim by DI and KB against G Ltd is dismissed. REASONS 1. DI and KB (together referred to as “the Applican...
...Act 1993. The proceedings in HRRT040/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand” as defendant while the proceedings in HRRT041/2011 cited the “Civil Aviation Authority of England operating in New Zealand”. The statements of claim are, in part, almost identical. Neither are models of clarity and are difficult to follow. They have been understood as making complaints that the defendants breached: [2.1] Principle 6 of the information privacy principles in that the de...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 76 APPLICANT JI RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $4312.50 to JL on or before 14 July 2022. Reasons 1. On 8 March 2021 JI entered into a contract with N Ltd (‘N Ltd’) to purchase a house and land package for which a CCC was issued on 23 June 2021, with settlement between the parties...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 358 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT LG The Tribunal orders: LG as trustee of LB is to pay X Ltd $6781.55 by 18 August 2023. Reasons Introduction: 1. X Ltd was contracted by LB trustees to provide forest operations and management services for the harvest of forestry at LB’s property at [address]. 2. X Ltd car...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 274 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay BT $1,469.30 on or before 14 July 2023. Reasons 1. BT purchased a [phone] online from T Ltd. He received the phone on 5 October 2022, and within a few days it was clear that the phone could not detect the pen or stylus as it was supposed to....
...needs to carry out remedial plumbing and tiling in order to replace the goods falls into the category of reasonably foreseeable losses that have resulted from the failure of guarantee. NC and CC provided evidence of those costs and the full amount claimed, apart from the Tribunal filing fee, which cannot be awarded, is to be paid by CD, being $1694.00. Referee: Date: 28 October 2020 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can...