Search Results

1. Gilbert v Mulligan - Part 3 Lot DP 3020 and others (Shelly Bay) (2023) 466 Aotea MB 164 (466 AOT 164) [pdf, 487 KB]

   ...Taranaki Whānui following their Treaty of Waitangi settlement with the Crown. 466 Aotea MB 167 [3] Although PNBST received the land at Shelly Bay, through a series of events it became owned by Shelly Bay Taikuru Limited (“SBTL”). SBTL was formed through the amalgamation of Shelly Bay Investments Limited and SBTL, which were and are associated with the property development company, the Wellington Company Limited. [4] The applicants are members of Taranaki Whānui and bene...

2. [2022] NZEmpC 140 Wiles v The Vice-Chancellor of the University of Auckland [pdf, 222 KB]

   ...Auckland [2021] NZERA 586 at [116] (Member Larmer). 2 At [92]. (b) adding further alleged breaches of the University’s Charter and Academic Standards Policy regarding the University’s obligations in relation to equity, research-informed teaching, academic freedom, and its role as the critic and conscience of society; (c) adding allegations that Dr Wiles has been singled out by the University for alleged non-compliance with the University’s Outside Activities Po...

3. BD v ET [2019] NZDT 1677 (21 November 2021) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...made the finding in the preceding paragraph, it follows that I also find that ET is not liable to pay the amount claimed. I therefore dismiss BD’s claim. Referee: P Ferguson Date: 21 November 2019 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to app...

4. LD v LT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1579 (12 August 2021) [pdf, 174 KB]

   ...made in New Zealand), and it is not reasonably free of defects (or of an acceptable finish) in that an edge strip attached to certain end panels is glossier than the adjacent front facing panel surface in her kitchen and creates a visible lack of uniformity across the two surfaces (which catches the light). LD says this should have been avoided by the company by choosing a closer matching strip, in terms of colour and gloss, which she says is freely available in the country. Is it mor...

5. BB v H Ltd [2023] NZDT 10 (5 April 2023) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312826#DLM312826 https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1993/0091/latest/link.aspx?id=DLM312818#DLM312818 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to app...

6. NX v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 212 (2 May 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   ...established on the balance of probabilities that he is entitled to any compensation from P Ltd, and his claim is dismissed. Referee: C Hawes Date: 2 May 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

7. TS v BO & TO [2023] NZDT 97 (22 February 2023) [pdf, 128 KB]

   ...Respondents. 2. WU is to be removed as Respondent. 3. The claim against CX is dismissed. Reasons 1. The above parties are the owners of a cross lease title at [Address]: a. TS is a trustee of the S Trust which owns Flat 3. b. BO and TO are former owners of 1. c. WU is a former owner of Flat 1. d. CX is the current owner of Flat 1. 2. WU did not attend the hearing or offer any defence to the claim. The absence of a party does not prevent a hearing from going ahead.

8. MA v X Ltd [2023] NZDT 704 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 201 KB]

   ...have found that MA breached X Ltd’s rules, there is no need for me to consider this issue. Accordingly, MA’s claim against X Ltd is dismissed. Referee: K. Armstrong Date: 20 December 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

9. BT v HT [2024] NZDT 353 (7 May 2024) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...Zealand Law (online ed, Thomson Reuters) at [59.24.2]. 2 Blumberg v Frucor Beverages Limited [2018] NZHC 1876. 3 Frucor Beverages Ltd v Blumberg [2020] 2 NZLR 51 at para 129, quoting an Australian decision with approval. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for...

10. TN v A Ltd [2024] NZDT 752 (1 October 2024) [pdf, 113 KB]

    ...commensurate with the service she received, in this case, half the contract price. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 1 October 2024 1 Subject to some exceptions that are not relevant here. Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply...