12922 items matching your search terms
IN THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL TRI-2021-100-002 BETWEEN HELEN BERNADETTE O’SULLIVAN, FIONA CHERIE WHITE & ANDREW RODGER WILTON as trustees of the WILTON FAMILY TRUST Claimants AND DEANE FLUIT BUILDER LTD First Respondent AND TAB DESIGN LTD (Removed) Second Respondent AND TILING SOLUTIONS WANAKA LTD Third Respondent AND QUEENSTOWN LAKES DISTRICT COUNCIL Fourth Respondent AND VALSPAR PAINT (NZ) LTD Fifth Respondent AND WILTON JOUBERT
...1). [22] I am satisfied the standard of the work was far short of the minimum level of competence. The type of work was routine, not complex. I have reviewed the submission drafted by the adviser. It provides strong evidence of incompetence. The application was unimpressive in form, as it did not provide a reasoned argument supporting the exercise of the statutory discretion. It was wholly deficient in substance for the reasons Immigration New Zealand identified. The adviser has not prov...
...what I regard as his limited knowledge, I am satisfied that there has been compliance with my judgment of 15 February 2017. [7] I am also satisfied that there is no need to order that Tanja Schlitter should file and serve an affidavit as requested in the application. The issue of documents which may have been held by her has been appropriately dealt with in Ms Park’s affirmation. [8] The application dated 8 August 2017 for enforcement of the judgment of 15 February 2017...
...applicant pursued a personal grievance alleging unjustifiable dismissal but, in its determination dated 5 September 2013,1 [3] The applicant decided to challenge the Authority’s determination. To do so as of right, he had to file a statement of claim in the Court within 28 days after the the Employment Relations Authority found that the dismissal was justifiable. 1 [2013] NZERA Christchurch 186. date of the determination...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 703 APPLICANT CQ RESPONDENT LM The Tribunal orders: LM is to pay CQ the sum of $421.43 by no later than 19 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In April 2023, CQ rented a sleepout from LM following cyclone damage to his [Suburb] home. The sleepout had one open room with bathroom, laundry and kitchen facilities in the main house. Kitchen and lau...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 433 APPLICANT NX RESPONDENT B Association Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT JE The Tribunal orders: NX’s claims against B Association Ltd and JE are dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. On 16 October 2022, NX purchased a [vehicle] for $10,500 from JE, in a private sale. Prior to purchase, NX a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 167 APPLICANT TD RESPONDENT DJ Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TD parked his 1996 Toyota Surf vehicle in the paid outdoor carpark at DJ Ltd’s premises on 19 August 2022. When he attempted to collect it on 23 August 2022 he discovered that it had been stolen. He claimed from his insurer...
...also incorporates mediation. Alternative solution: A design solution that differs totally or partially from the solutions given in the compliance documents, yet complies with the Building Code. Applicant: A person or legal entity that files an application. A respondent can be an applicant in relation to a procedural application or an application for strike-out, etc. Application: A claim form completed in anticipation of an assessment of a dwelling-house where the applicant has s...
...2014 SECOND INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A A COUCH [1] The history of this matter is summarised in my first interlocutory judgment dated 29 August 2013.1 [2] The plaintiff took that opportunity by filing a third amended statement of claim on 17 September 2013. The defendant very quickly responded with an application to strike out parts of that statement. It is that application to strike out which is decided in this judgment. In that decision, I made an order strik...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...