Search Results

1. Family legal aid fees - consultation paper [pdf, 816 KB]

   ...approach 7 Provider rates and hearing activities 7 New policy 8 Case management levels 8 Amendments to grants 8 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agents’ fees 9 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 9 New forms 9 Changes to existing policy 9 Reassignment policy 9 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Proposed Family Fees Schedules: 12 4 Introduction he Ministry of Justice is introducing a new fee framework for fam...

2. OM v PR LCRO 118 / 2011 (14 August 2012) [pdf, 89 KB]

   ...was attached to information that Mr OM had sent with his complaint. [2] The complaint was not upheld by the Standards Committee. This review application was made by Mr OM who is referred to as the Applicant. [3] The background is that BAI claimed the Applicant owed it money, and when the Applicant wanted certain repairs done to machinery on his farm, BAI agreed to undertake the repair work providing that an amount of money representing its claim was paid into the trust account...

3. BK & KK v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 405 (3 July 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 405 APPLICANT BK & KK as trustees of X Family Trust RESPONDEN T Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: Q Ltd is to pay KK and BK $5,345.44 within 28 days; and within 28 days of making the payment of $5,345.44 to KK and BK, Q Ltd must remove the [water pump], the subject of this dispute, from the K property at a time to be arranged with KK and BK....

4. [2022] NZEmpC 112 Shaw v Bay of Plenty District Health Board [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2022] NZEmpC 112 EMPC 4/2019 EMPC 360/2019 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN ANA SHAW Plaintiff AND BAY OF PLENTY DISTRICT HEALTH BOARD Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: SR Mitchell, counsel for plaintiff M Beech and CL McGregor, coun...

5. NM & S Ltd v PT [2023] NZDT 679 (29 August 2023) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 679 APPLICANT NM APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT PT The Tribunal orders: PT is to pay S Ltd the total sum of $4,905.26 on or before Tuesday 26 September 2023. Reasons: 1. S Ltd was engaged by PT to install roofing at [address] for a price of $9,810.53. PT paid a 50% deposit. 2. S Ltd (the company) and its roofer NM claim...

6. LT Ltd v ON & NN [2022] NZDT 137 (15 August 2022) [pdf, 142 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 137 APPLICANT EB APPLICANT LT Ltd RESPONDENT ON SECOND RESPONDENT NN The Tribunal orders: 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim. 2. ON and NN are to pay $200.00 to LT Ltd before 15 August 2022. Reasons. 1. EB has been removed as an Applicant in this claim at her request, as the contr...

7. EC v ST [2024] NZDT 37 (23 February 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 37 APPLICANT EC RESPONDENT ST APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) BC Limited The Tribunal orders: ST is to pay BC Limited $4,539.70 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons 1. The applicant, EC, was travelling north along [road 1] when the front of ST’s vehicle hit the right side of EC’s vehicle....

8. SE v D Ltd [2023] NZDT 456 (17 August 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 456 APPLICANT SE RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay SE $550.00 by 31 August 2023. Reasons: 1. In May 2022, SE provided entertainment services to D Ltd. D Ltd deducted bond money from each of her payments and has refused to return the bond. 2. SE attended the hearing. D Ltd did not attend. On the...

9. MM v YY [2023] NZDT 613 (2 November 2023) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 613 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT YY The Tribunal orders: YY is to pay MM $380.00 on or before the 21st day of November 2023. Reasons: Introduction: 1. MM entered into an agreement with YY to rent a room in her boarding house at $190 per week, to be paid fortnightly. 2. On the 12th of November 2022 MM paid $380 being two week...

10. [2019] NZEmpC 41 Renaissance Assets Management Ltd v Ge [pdf, 350 KB]

    ...AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 41 EMPC 289/2018 EMPC 323/2018 IN THE MATTER OF challenges to determinations of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application to strike out proceedings BETWEEN RENAISSANCE ASSETS MANAGEMENT LIMITED Plaintiff AND JINQI GE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G Pollak, counsel for plaintiff J Moor...