Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12515 items matching your search terms

  1. [2012] NZEmpC 85 Patel v Pegasus Stations Ltd [pdf, 46 KB]

    ...plaintiff in his amended statement of claim filed on 28 October 2011. The plaintiff’s de novo challenge is a defended matter and therefore requires a directions conference and the allocation of a fixture to deal with it. [3] If the plaintiff’s application amounted to a request for judgment by default it must therefore be dismissed. [4] The defendant has filed a memorandum accepting the plaintiff’s request that the directions conference take place with the plaintiff, i...

  2. LCRO 9/2020 SC v KB and ZR (30 April 2020) [pdf, 110 KB]

    ...complaint is succinctly set out at the commencement of the Committee’s decision of 25 November 2019. 2 [3] I repeat that brief summary here:1 [1] In early 2011 Ms [SC] instructed Ms [KB] on behalf of her family to advance a Treaty of Waitangi claim. [2] Legal aid funding was initially granted, and Mr [ZR] was the Lead Provider for a period. Mr [ZR] ceased practising in 2013 at which point he was appointed a [redacted] judge.2 [3] In around 2015 Ms [SC] complained about Ms [K...

  3. DZ v LU & IW Ltd [2024] NZDT 469 (4 June 2024) [pdf, 200 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 469 APPLICANT DZ FIRST RESPONDENT LU SECOND RESPONDENT IW Ltd The Tribunal orders: IW Ltd is to pay $3071.55 to DZ on or before 2 July 2024; and The claim against LU is dismissed. Reasons 1. IW Ltd was the lessee in a commercial property owned by DZ. In late 2022, IW Ltd sold its business and the lease was assign...

  4. BC v KQ & EQ [2024] NZDT 146 (15 April 2024) [pdf, 193 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 146 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT KQ SECOND RESPONDENT EQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BC previously travelled through New Zealand. In June 2023, before departing New Zealand, BC sold a car to KQ. BC and KQ agreed a price of $4,900.00 and details of a [Money Services transmitte...

  5. U Ltd v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 747 (15 December 2023) [pdf, 197 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 747 APPLICANT U Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is ordered to pay U Ltd the sum of $297.85. Payment of this sum is ordered no later than 10 January 2024. Reasons: 1) On 28 July 2023 a technician employed by the applicant attended the respondent’s premises in [Town 1] to assist with the non-functioning of a machine w...

  6. [2022] NZEmpC 103 Pilgrim v Attorney-General [pdf, 230 KB]

    ...EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 103 EMPC 85/2022 IN THE MATTER OF a declaration under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 AND IN THE MATTER OF an application to access Court documents BETWEEN SERENITY PILGRIM, ANNA COURAGE, ROSE STANDTRUE, CRYSTAL LOYAL, PEARL VALOR AND VIRGINIA COURAGE Plaintiffs AND THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL SUED ON BEHALF OF THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS,...

  7. Z Ltd v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 604 (7 November 2023) [pdf, 230 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 604 APPLICANT Z Ltd RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by Z Ltd against P Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In or about August 2020, P Ltd undertook gas fitting and plumbing work (“the work”) at the premises of Z Ltd at [Address] (“the premises”). The work was completed in August/September 2020 and an invoice was...

  8. UH v N Ltd [2023] NZDT 306 (21 July 2023) [pdf, 136 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 306 APPLICANT UH RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $625.00 to UH on or before Wednesday 16 August 2023. Reasons: 1. UH engaged the service of N Ltd to engrave the names of his sons onto the back of [two watches]. The watches are family heirlooms that UH estimated to be 100 years old, and...

  9. BX v W Ltd [2023] NZDT 709 (21 December 2023) [pdf, 117 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 6 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 709 APPLICANT BX RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: W Ltd is to pay directly to BX the sum of $3,078.72 on or before Wednesday, 31 January 2024. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. The parties agree the respondent in this matter is as above. The respondent...

  10. Legal aid final family consultation paper - 10 February 2012 [pdf, 816 KB]

    ...approach 7 Provider rates and hearing activities 7 New policy 8 Case management levels 8 Amendments to grants 8 Amendment criteria 9 Non-lawyer costs and agents’ fees 9 Applications received before and after the July 2012 start date 9 New forms 9 Changes to existing policy 9 Reassignment policy 9 Consultation feedback 11 Questions 11 Proposed Family Fees Schedules: 12 4 Introduction he Ministry of Justice is introducing a new fee framework for fam...