Search Results

1. [2022] NZACC 127 – ONeill v ACC (4 July 2022) [pdf, 308 KB]

   ...____________________________________________________________________ [1] The primary issue in this appeal is whether the reviewers were wrong to find that there were no reviewable decisions in respect of review numbers 6540240, 6599693, 6596703. A related issue is whether the appellant has a valid claim for cover for his right eye injury, and if so whether ACC has failed to make a decision on that claim within the statutory time frame. ACR 119/20 Background [2] Mr O’Neill h...

2. Hastie and Dredge TRI-2023-100-001 Procedural Order 4 [pdf, 154 KB]

   ...ARCHITECT LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1496058) Fourth Respondent AND DSF BUILDERS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 1863635) Fifth Respondent AND CONTRACT HOLDINGS LIMITED (COMPANY NUMBER 636388) Sixth Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 4 Removal application by fourth respondent - declined Dated 16 February 2024 2 Introduction [1] The fourth respondent has applied to be removed from this proceeding under s 112 of the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 200...

3. Lochead-MacMillan v AMI Insurance [2012] NZHRRT 5 [pdf, 109 KB]

   ...Act 1993 they contend that AMI failed to respond to their requests in a manner that complied with AMI’s responsibilities as an agency under the Privacy Act. Background [3] The fire occurred at the Lochead-MacMillan home on 9 January 2010. The claims on the house and household contents policies were notified to AMI the following day. On 22 January 2010 AMI engaged VFR Consulting Limited (VFR) to carry out initial investigations regarding the circumstances of the fire. Mr Neil McKa...

4. BG v TQ Ltd [2023] NZDT 145 (3 July 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 145 APPLICANT BG RESPONDENT TQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: BG is to pay TQ Ltd $63.50 on or before 11 August 2023. Reasons: 1. BG received a parking breach notice charging her $65.00 by TQ Ltd (TQ LTD) for parking her car in the [mall] for 26 minutes without paying for her parking. BG has paid $1.50 to TQ LTD which...

5. LT v I Ltd [2023] NZDT 723 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

6. EN v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 726 (20 December 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

7. KN v ID Inc [2021] NZDT 1527 (13 August 2021) [pdf, 216 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1527 APPLICANT KN RESPONDENT ID Inc SECOND RESPONDENT XI Corp The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 2 May 2021 KN’s vehicle was parked in the car park adjacent to the [City] Stadium (the turf). A ball hit on the turf, flew over the fence and damaged KN’s vehicle. 2. KN...

8. LD v LT Ltd [2021] NZDT 1579 (12 August 2021) [pdf, 174 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1579 APPLICANT LD RESPONDENT LT Ltd The Tribunal orders: LT Ltd is to pay LD $782 by no later than Thursday 2 September 2021. Reasons: 1. LD is suing LT Ltd for $7,976.00 in connection with the supply and installation of kitchen cabinetry. LD claims a worker for the company damaged her dining table during the inst...

9. GC v U New Zealand [2024] NZDT 280 (17 May 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 280 APPLICANT GC RESPONDENT U New Zealand The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GC purchased a new [electric vehicle] in late 2022. In 2023, after the vehicle had done 27,000 kms, GC discovered a puncture in the back left tyre. As a large stone had penetrated the tyre, it could not be repaired. U New Zealand fitte...

10. BL v EE [2024] NZDT 273 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 172 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 273 APPLICANT BL RESPONDENT EE The Tribunal orders: EE is to pay to BL the amount of $5,415.00. Payment is to be made on or before 20 April 2024. Reasons 1. BL and EE entered a relationship from 29 September 2022 until 24 October 2022. In January, February and March 2023 EE reached out to BL asking for mone...