12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1415 APPLICANT UQD Ltd RESPONDENT KN RESPONDENT INSURER JB Ltd The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay the sum of $2172.40 to UQD Ltd on or before 14 October 2020. Reasons 1. On 25 February 2019 KN negligently caused damage to UQD Ltd’s 1994 Nissan Largo van (fitted out as a campervan) and driven b...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 450 APPLICANT EN RESPONDENT QN SECOND RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: The claim against QN and DN is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. QN has a painting business that he and EN work at for a week or two per month. When working for the business, EN is paid for his work. 2. In August of 20...
...The defendant, Mr Wildbore, was employed by the plaintiff to work in that café. The employment relationship began in March 2011. In March 2012, it came to an end. [2] Mr Wildbore alleged that he had been unjustifiably dismissed and lodged a claim to that effect with the Employment Relations Authority (the Authority). He also made a claim for arrears of wages and holiday pay. The Authority sustained those claims and awarded him remedies totalling about $11,500. Ms Jerard chal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 707 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT NU The Tribunal orders: NU is to pay TC $759.00 on or before 31 January 2024. Reasons [1] TC claims from NU the cost of removing a large tree branch from his, TC’s, driveway. The branch had fallen from a tree on the neighbouring property, owned by NU. [2] TC said that on the morning of Wednesday 15 Oc...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 171 APPLICANT EM RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay EM $1,500 by 6 July 2023 Reasons 1. EM claims a refund of the $1,500 deposit he paid S Ltd which was retained after he cancelled his order for wedding flowers and rental decorations. He also asks for his $45 filing fee and...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1600 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay D Ltd the sum of $8,072.15 on or before 5pm on 9 July 2021. Reasons 1. On 1 November 2017 the parties executed a Sale and Purchase agreement. A further term of that agreement required a retainer of $20,000.00 be held in the B Ltd (B)...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 594 APPLICANT 2nd APPLICANT 3RD APPLICANT EU F Ltd SC Ltd RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: I Ltd Limited is to pay $19,811.51 to F Ltd on or before 16 August 2024; and I Ltd Limited is to pay $5486.14 to SC Ltd on or before 16 August 2024; and EU has no further liability to F Ltd or SC Ltd in relation t...
...vehicle, and that CB had insufficient time to avoid a collision. I therefore prefer their evidence. I would add that, if CB had not swerved and instead hit MJ head on, she would have likely suffered more serious consequences. Are the costs claimed reasonable? 16. If a party breaches a duty owed to another, and causes damage, they must pay the cost of putting that person into the position they would have been in had the breach not occurred. There is a duty to mitigate loss....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 73 APPLICANT PQ RESPONDENT ET The Tribunal orders: ET is to pay PQ $18,972.55 by 8 March 2024. Background 1. ET and Mr and Mrs P own neighbouring properties. Mr and Mrs P purchased their property from ET in 2015/16. 2. In or around February 2021 ET and Mr P made a verbal agreement about laying new power cable from the existing [...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 40 APPLICANT CK APPLICANT NK RESPONDENT BG SECOND RESPONDENT HG The Tribunal orders: 1. HG is joined to the claim as second respondent. 2. BG and HG are to pay CK and NK $1,559.79 by Friday 10 November 2023. Reasons: 1. CK and NK and BG and HG, all attended the hearing by teleconference. 2. Desp...