Search Results

1. Lim v Gu-Chang [2014] NZIACDT 77 (29 August 2014) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...client’s detention at a police station and likely deportation. The complainant says the publication was unprofessional and disclosed confidential information. [3] The other aspect of the complaint is that Ms Gu-Chang set a fee of $12,800 to prepare an application to Immigration New Zealand for a visa under the discretionary provisions in the Act. [4] Ms Gu-Chang says the website publication was anonymous, did not defame her client and was accordingly professional. She says the fee was...

2. KY v TU Ltd [2019] NZDT 1521 (23 May 2019) [pdf, 201 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1521 APPLICANT KY RESPONDENT TU Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: TU Limited is to pay the sum of $150.00 to KY on or before Thursday 6 June 2019. Reasons: 1. On 1 March 2019, KY dropped her friend at the [redacted] Embassy at [address]. She parked and followed her friend inside. By the time they returned to...

3. HG v ET [2020] NZDT 1411 (1 July 2020) [pdf, 117 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1411 First Claim APPLICANT HG RESPONDENT ET FIRST RESPONDENT INSURER WJ Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT EC Second claim APPLICANT TQ Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) WJ Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT EC BW The Tribunal orders:...

4. CX v A Ltd [2019] NZDT 1336 (16 June 2019) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...parked at the A Ltd [Redacted] car park for approximately 45 minutes in the early evening of 11 February this year. CX has paid $6 to A Ltd (which he notes is twice the $3 fee he would have had to pay had he obtained a ticket) and has filed this claim with the Tribunal seeking a declaration that he is not liable to pay the remaining $59 (although in the claim form the sum he noted was the entire $65). 2. The issues I need to decide are: a. Was it a condition of a contract between CX...

5. EFT v SQ [2019] NZDT 1357 (25 October 2019) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1357 APPLICANT DE As Trustee of E Family Trust APPLICANT FM As Trustee of E Family Trust APPLICANT XE As Trustee of E Family Trust RESPONDENT SQ RESPONDENT INSURER JBH New Zealand Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Late in the evening on 24 June 2...

6. QD & SC v NU [2023] NZDT 756 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 207 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

7. SK v T Ltd [2023] NZDT 196 (12 May 2023) [pdf, 169 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 196 APPLICANT SK RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SK parked on private land while attending a concert in the city, and his vehicle was towed by T Ltd. He paid $350.00 to retrieve his vehicle and claims a refund of that amount plus associated costs, based on his understanding from...

8. K&B Partnership v JC [2016] NZDT 1345 (14 April 2016) [pdf, 184 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1345 APPLICANT K&B Partnership RESPONDENT JC The Tribunal hereby orders: JC is to pay K&B Partnership (the Partnership) $15,000 on or before 5 May 2016. Reasons 1. The Partnership claims $15,000 in compensation from JC for an animal it owned that JC admits he shot. 2. The key issue I have to decid...

9. ST Ltd v FS [2023] NZDT 543 (31 October 2023) [pdf, 203 KB]

   ...the ‘reduced value’ assessment should be less than those costs but not by a significant degree. 23. Using ST Ltd’s lower figure for re-doing the part of the driveway, I consider the difference between $24,248.00 ($21,085+GST) and ST Ltd’s claimed balance outstanding of $15,636,55 more than enough of a reduction from an ‘actual’ redo cost, to recognise that an actual redo will not be occurring in the near future. 24. For all the above reasons, I find that FS is not liable...

10. Budget 2024 Full-List-of-Fee-Changes.pdf [pdf, 369 KB]

    ...otherwise. If you have any questions about the fees in this document, then please email feechanges@justice.govt.nz mailto:feechanges@justice.govt.nz Court fees Supreme Court Current rate (inc GST) New rate (inc GST) Filing an application for leave to appeal $1,100 $1,430 Filing an interlocutory application, unless in the case of an application for a review of a Registrar’s decision $400 $520 Scheduling the hearing date for an appeal and hearing an appeal...