Search Results

1. SB v XQ Ltd [2024] NZDT 663 (3 September 2024) [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...a photo in evidence apparently alleging it to be a photo of SB, which he denies; and c. XQ Limited’s appeal system is unsatisfactory, not user-friendly, and does not allow a Page 2 of 3 reasonable number of attempts to lodge information. 8. On the evidence however I am not satisfied SB has proven these concerns breach a standard of reasonable care and skill. I say that for reasons including: a. SB’s evidence confirms he shopped at [the supermarket] that day and...

2. LT v B Ltd [2024] NZDT 690 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 97 KB]

   ...of this dispute, other than to seek the assistance of this Tribunal. 18. B Ltd has accordingly failed to show the claim was frivolous or vexatious. Referee: S Simmonds Date: 13 November 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

3. Q Ltd v SN & TT [2024] NZDT 628 (19 August 2024) [pdf, 104 KB]

   ...$1,600.00 by 11 September 2024. Background 1. The claim seeks payment for mortgage broking services. 2. Q Ltd (BS) says that it provided services to SN and TT subject to terms and conditions, including a term that: If any work is performed by us and any approval or acceptance offer is obtained from the insurer or lender, we may charge a fee for each which you will need to pay if the insurance or loan is not availed or does not proceed. […] The fee is usually based on the a...

4. SM v H Ltd [2025] NZDT 261 (10 June 2025) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...6. Because I was not satisfied on the evidence provided that TI caused the damage to [Canoe 2], the claim of $5,500.00 for [Canoe 2] is dismissed. N Wolland Disputes Tribunal Referee 10 June 2025 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

5. LE v BI [2024] NZDT 31 (2 February 2024) [pdf, 139 KB]

   ...being the address LE obtained for him from the 2023 electoral roll. I therefore went ahead with the hearing without BI because a Respondent is not obliged to attend the hearing of a claim made against them. This decision is based on the evidence and information before me in accordance with s42 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988. Issues 4. The issues I need to determine are: (a) Did BI make a representation to LE about the Baby Carrier and, if so, was LE induced by the representatio...

6. B Ltd v Council [2024] NZDT 709 (2 July 2024) [pdf, 151 KB]

   ...construction of a new boundary line fence. Referee: T Prowse Date: 2 July 2024 5 This because there is no obligation in the Fencing Act that imposes liability on council for a boundary line fence. Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. BN & EN v Z Ltd [2025] NZDT 76 (4 March 2025) [pdf, 206 KB]

   ...report who was not a Licensed Building Practitioner. As BN & EN have not proven their claim, it is dismissed. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 4 March 2025 1 (2000) 11 ANZ Insurance Cases Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...

8. Kauikia-Stevens v Trustees of the Rangitatau 1D5A1 Block (2014) 318 Aotea MB 217 (318 AOT 217) [pdf, 267 KB]

   ...Kauika-Stevens was completed on his own. [41] In relation to the shed, Mr Wirihana-Tawake advises that this is now used to store urupa equipment, for which he states approval was given at one of the marae trust meetings. The trustees have previously requested Mr Kauika-Stevens remove his own equipment from the shed, which has been refused. He submitted, contrary to the applicant’s evidence, that the shed is not part of the dwelling at issue. [42] Mr Wirihana-Tawake supports th...

9. Cooper v Wellington City Council [pdf, 237 KB]

   CLAIM NO: 2171 UNDER The Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2002 IN THE MATTER of an adjudication BETWEEN AVIS COOPER Claimant AND WELLINGTON CITY COUNCIL First Respondent AND R & I KENNEDY LIMITED Second Respondent AND R TE ONE ASSOCIATES LIMITED Third Respondent AND No Fourth Respondent Master Build Services Limited having been struck out AND TREVOR GASKIN Fifth Respondent AND No Sixth Respondent CSR Building...

10. LC v DH Ltd & QH Ltd [2021] NZDT 1667 (11 October 2021) [pdf, 115 KB]

    ...her with her window problems. Section 43 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 allows costs to be awarded in limited circumstances, none of which apply here. Referee: L Thompson Date: 11 October 2021 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...