Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12515 items matching your search terms

  1. He & Qin [2013] NZWHT Auckland 18 [pdf, 58 KB]

    1 [2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 18 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 7148: DAO HE AND PING QIN – 37C Hindmarsh Street, Johnsonville ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL [1] Dao He and Ping Qin are the owners of 37C Hindmarsh Street which is a townhouse in a three unit three-storey multi-unit c...

  2. CQ v LM [2023] NZDT 703 (16 December 2023) [pdf, 231 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 703 APPLICANT CQ RESPONDENT LM The Tribunal orders: LM is to pay CQ the sum of $421.43 by no later than 19 January 2024. Reasons: 1. In April 2023, CQ rented a sleepout from LM following cyclone damage to his [Suburb] home. The sleepout had one open room with bathroom, laundry and kitchen facilities in the main house. Kitchen and lau...

  3. [2018] NZEmpC 34 Matsuoka v LSG Sky Chefs NZ Ltd [pdf, 300 KB]

    ...what I regard as his limited knowledge, I am satisfied that there has been compliance with my judgment of 15 February 2017. [7] I am also satisfied that there is no need to order that Tanja Schlitter should file and serve an affidavit as requested in the application. The issue of documents which may have been held by her has been appropriately dealt with in Ms Park’s affirmation. [8] The application dated 8 August 2017 for enforcement of the judgment of 15 February 2017...

  4. Tukutau v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 59 (30 April 2014) [pdf, 117 KB]

    ...1). [22] I am satisfied the standard of the work was far short of the minimum level of competence. The type of work was routine, not complex. I have reviewed the submission drafted by the adviser. It provides strong evidence of incompetence. The application was unimpressive in form, as it did not provide a reasoned argument supporting the exercise of the statutory discretion. It was wholly deficient in substance for the reasons Immigration New Zealand identified. The adviser has not prov...

  5. [2021] NZEnvC 186 Wallace v Waikato District Council [pdf, 193 KB]

    Wallace v Waikato District Council IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TĀMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2021] NZEnvC 186 IN THE MATTER OF an application for declarations under section 310(c) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act) BETWEEN G WALLACE (ENV-2021-AKL-000134) Appellant AND WAIKATO DISTRICT COUNCIL Respondent Court: Alternate Environment Judge Newhook, sitting alone pursuant to s 279 of the Act Hearing: On the pape...

  6. Te Manutukutuku Issue 2 [pdf, 2.9 MB]

    ...without embellishment, will continue. There is no Director's column this month because the Director, Wira Gardiner, left the Waitangi Tribunal at the end of September to take up the position of General Manager of the Iwi Transition Agency. Applications for the position of Director have closed and a new appointment will be made in November. Legal Aid for Claimants As a result of its agreement with the New Zealand Maori Council about State Owned Enterprises, the Crown, in 1988,...

  7. [2014] NZEmpC 1 Howard v Carter Holt Harvey Packaging Ltd [pdf, 28 KB]

    ...applicant pursued a personal grievance alleging unjustifiable dismissal but, in its determination dated 5 September 2013,1 [3] The applicant decided to challenge the Authority’s determination. To do so as of right, he had to file a statement of claim in the Court within 28 days after the the Employment Relations Authority found that the dismissal was justifiable. 1 [2013] NZERA Christchurch 186. date of the determination...

  8. [2022] NZEmpC 222 Gumbeze v The Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki [pdf, 225 KB]

    ...Bigson Gumbeze was employed as a registered social worker by the Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children until he was dismissed on 15 December 2017. [2] In the Employment Relations Authority Mr Gumbeze’s personal grievance claim was unsuccessful.1 1 Gumbeze v Chief Executive of Oranga Tamariki – Ministry for Children [2022] NZERA 232 (Member Cheyne). [3] The Authority’s determination was dated 2 June 2022. The time available to Mr Gumbeze...

  9. BK v XQ Ltd [2022] NZDT 261 (13 December 2022) [pdf, 207 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

  10. DC and SN v KH [2020] NZDT 1449 (23 September 2020) [pdf, 215 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1449 APPLICANT DC and SN RESPONDENT KH APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) AB Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. SN and KH were the drivers involved in a minor motor vehicle collision on a rural gravel road in March 2018. KH was reversing down a driveway when SN was...