12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 687 APPLICANT MK & NK RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $1748.00 to MK and NK on or before 31 January 2024 and the balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In May 2022, MK and NK engaged B Ltd to re-roof their commercially-tenanted house in [Suburb]. MK and NK accepted B Ltd’s written quotation for $...
...[1] Judgment was issued in these proceedings on 26 October 2021.1 It dealt with two challenges arising from a determination of the Employment Relations Authority.2 Ms Stenhouse challenged the whole of the determination and added a claim alleging that Towman Towing Group Ltd had breached her right to privacy.3 [2] Towman’s challenge was confined to disputing the Authority’s conclusion that a personal grievance had arisen because of the circumstances in which Ms Ste...
LCRO 7/2012 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee BETWEEN ND Of Auckland Applicant AND VC Of Auckland Respondent The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] Mr ND (the Applicant) had sent an invoice to A for services rendered....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 622 APPLICANT MX APPLICANT MY RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: F Ltd is to pay MX and MY as trustees of the M Trust $6941.29 on or before Friday 8 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In November 2021, the Applicants accepted a quote from F Ltd (the company) for $9,327.00, reduced by $1000.00 from the original quote of $10,327.00. T...
...in maintaining the deceit claim at and after the September 2009 settlement conference, despite his admission to Mr [RS] constitutes an attempt to pervert the course of justice and the Committee has not made any inquiries on that issue. (f) The request that a retired High Court Judge investigate the claim was justified because: 9 (i) The complaint was made against Mr [SY], a senior partner in a well-known law firm. (ii) The nature of the complaint and the background proceed...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 569 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: P Ltd is to pay $18,000.00 to D Ltd on or before 29 November 2023. Reasons 1. D Ltd supplied archaeology and heritage services in relation to a commercial property at [Address]. At the time D Ltd was engaged, excavation works were being undertaken at the property as p...
...dealt with on the papers filed, and in light of oral submissions advanced during the course of a telephone conference on 4 February 2022. The three applications are: an application by the plaintiff for leave to amend their statement of claim; an application by the plaintiff to exclude a document from the bundle; and an application by the plaintiff to exclude two paragraphs from a witness’s brief of evidence on the basis that they contain inadmissible statements. I deal w...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1347 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT O Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MD sent a computer to her daughter using a courier service through her employer. MD’s employer has a book of postal credits associated with the return of magazine ‘headers’ for audit purposes. MD sent the compu...
...The deduction was made pursuant to the provisions of s 70 of the Social Security Act 1964. Background [3] The appellant was granted New Zealand Superannuation at the Living Alone rate from 16 January 2014. We understand that at the time of her application she was in receipt of a Sickness Benefit and had been in receipt of this benefit since 2009. [4] As part of the application requirements the appellant was required to make an application for a pension from the United Kingdom, as she...
...Judgment: 13 March 2020 INTERLOCUTORY JUDGMENT OF JUDGE K G SMITH (Applications to strike out part of the proceeding) [1] Zara’s Turkish Ltd has applied to strike out several causes of action in an amended statement of claim filed by Ibrahim and Güler Kocatürk. [2] The application is made on the basis that the Court does not have jurisdiction to consider the disputed pleadings, either because they fall outside s 187 of the Employment Relations Ac...