12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 58 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT Y Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. This order replaces my order of 2 February 2024. 2. Y Ltd is to pay FN $2999.00 on or before 5pm on 12 March 2024. 3. FN is to return the laptop to Y Ltd on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. Reasons 1. I made a typographical error in my order of 2 February 2024. T...
1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6565: FEEBEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED – 7 BUTIA AVENUE, HENDERSON, AUCKLAND ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Feebee Investments Limited (Feebee) are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim under secti...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 174 APPLICANT D Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT JD SECOND RESPONDENT WD The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: JD and WD are jointly and severally liable to pay $1277.40 to D Ltd on or before 1 December 2022. Reasons 1. D Ltd supplied carpet to Mr and Mrs D in March 2019 for the upstairs and st...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 101 APPLICANT ND Ltd RESPONDENT TS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BG Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT SQ The Tribunal orders: 1. TS Ltd is to pay ND Ltd $2,040.00 on or before 12 May 2023. 2. The claims against BG Ltd and SQ are dismissed. Reasons: 1. ND Ltd hired a vehicle from TS Ltd. Durin...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 191 BETWEEN AFD APPLICANT AND LM Insurance Ltd APPLICANT’S INSURER AND ZUS RESPONDENT Date of Order: 21 June 2013 Referee: Referee Avia ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZUS is to pay LM Insurance Ltd $1,993.76 on or before 5 July 2013. Facts [1] On 27 January 2013, ZUS reversed her car down a shared driveway. AFD had...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 601 APPLICANT S Ltd RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. S Ltd’s application is dismissed. Reasons 2. On 2 November 2021, S Ltd was contacted by an employee of E Ltd and was asked to design and price a kitchen for a customer for whom E Ltd was building a home. On 22 November E Ltd followed up on the quotes. The design and...
...agreed to reduce IL’s rent to $195 per week. 19. She, therefore, claims that she should be at least refunded the extra payments between 3 April and 21 May when she vacated her room. 20. I am not satisfied that the contract was amended as claimed by IL. This is because IL’s email before the Tribunal dated 30 March 2023 indicates that she made a unilateral decision to reduce her rent to $195. Her email starts as follows: As mentioned on WhatsApp (0n 26/3/23), I will begin payi...
...notice and following up that the tenant had received notice, the Tenancy Tribunal ordered immediate termination of the tenancy on 2 July 2021, upholding that the proper 90 days’ notice had been given. 10. MW, QN Ltd’s property manager for the applicants’ property (until she left in late May 2021 and UJ took over) spoke at the hearing as a witness and stated that, in the first month after giving the tenant notice, she managed to talk to him in person once after multiple attempts a...
...proceeding has needed to seek such leave. In my judgment of 15 March 2021, I granted leave to Mr Pan to bring a late non-de novo challenge.1 1 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [2021] NZEmpC 28. [3] I directed that Mr Pan file a statement of claim by 18 March 2021. That application was, ultimately, not opposed by Juyi. [4] Juyi’s statement of defence in respect of that claim was due on 24 March 2021. An attempt to take this step was not undertaken until the next day....
...SAMUELS v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2019] NZEmpC 92 [5 August 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 92 EMPC 68/2018 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an unless order BETWEEN ROLAND SAMUELS Applicant AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND CAROLYN L...