Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12515 items matching your search terms

  1. Reekie v Roberts [2013] NZHRRT 7 [pdf, 100 KB]

    ...by Ruth Wood as McKenzie friend Mr P Dacre for Defendant DATE OF HEARING: 11 and 12 October 2012 DATE OF DECISION: 14 March 2013 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL Introduction [1] Mr Reekie’s case is that he addressed two information privacy requests to his former lawyer, Mr Roberts. He alleges that as neither request was responded to it follows that on each occasion there was an interference with his privacy as defined in s 66(2)(a)(i) of the Privacy Act 1993. He seeks (inter al...

  2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 4 [pdf, 3 MB]

    ...overseas. While there is a lot we can learn from what occurs in other countries, there is much we can offer them too. I was also struck by the number of inquiries I fielded from Maori people about the work of the Tribunal - some of the information requested was of a very basic nature. It seems to me that the Tribunal Division has a lot of work to do in getting knowledge about the Tribunal and the claims process to the people and I look forward to organising information. seminars later...

  3. AGG Ltd v ZVP and ZVO Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] NZDT 427 (16 May 2013) [pdf, 61 KB]

    IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 427 BETWEEN AGG Ltd APPLICANT AND ZVP FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZVO Ltd (in liquidation) SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 16 May 2013 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that AGG Ltd’s claim to be struck out. Facts [1] The disputed obligations are of a contractual nature between AGG Ltd and ZVO Ltd....

  4. [2015] NZEmpC 40 Ritchies Transport v Merennage [pdf, 69 KB]

    IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 40 EMPC 288/2014 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of a stay of proceedings and an application to amend pleadings BETWEEN RITCHIES TRANSPORT Plaintiff AND KEERITIHI MERENNAGE Defendant Hearing: By consent memorandum filed on 30 March 2015 Appearances: G Mayes and K Amodeo, counsel for plai...

  5. XP v O Ltd [2023] NZDT 729 (12 December 2023) [pdf, 223 KB]

    ...something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20-working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearin...

  6. UI v BC [2024] NZDT 331 (30 April 2024) [pdf, 201 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 331 APPLICANT UI RESPONDENT BC The Tribunal orders: BC is to pay $1,322.00 to UI by 20 May 2024. Reasons 1. UI purchased a trombone (the trombone) from BC. It was advertised [online]. There was a photo of the trombone and the advertisement stated that it was ‘gold plated’. Questions by prospective buyers about the condition of the...

  7. NQ v QC [2023] NZDT 328 (19 July 2023) [pdf, 118 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 328 APPLICANT NQ RESPONDENT QC Ltd The Tribunal orders: QC Ltd is to pay NQ the sum of $1,900.00 within 21 days of the date of this order. QC Ltd’s counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In 2022, QC Ltd acted for NQ on an employment matter with his previous employer, ED. QC Ltd sent to NQ a L...

  8. 1.-Full-List-of-Fee-Changes-23-July.pdf [pdf, 366 KB]

    ...to the court under any enactment $540 $702 3 Filing any other initiating document (as defined in regulation 4), unless a different filing fee is prescribed for that document elsewhere in the fees table $1,350 $1,755 4 Filing a statement of claim between defendants $110 $143 5 Filing an amended statement of claim $110 $143 6 Interlocutory application (a) without notice (b) on notice relating to a proceeding to which item 2, 3, 46 or 48 applies (c) with notice (a) $200 (b) $...

  9. Bamber v Official Assignee - Lot 39 DPS 3455 [2022] Chief Judge's MB 664 (2022 CJ 664) [pdf, 359 KB]

    ...mailto:reuben.hindriksen@mc.co.nz mailto:charl@ranfurlychambers.co.nz 2022 Chief Judge's MB 665 Hei tīmatanga kōrero Introduction [1] The trustees of the Bamber Whānau Trust seek to cancel the order made at 238 Waiariki MB 196-205 on 13 August 2020. They claim that the order is incorrect because of a mistake, error, or omission on the part of the Court, or in the presentation of the facts of the case to the Court. They allege that the order for a rehearing and annulment...

  10. K Ltd v SK & TK [2023] NZDT 651 (10 November 2023) [pdf, 235 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 651 APPLICANT K Ltd RESPONDENT SK and TK The Tribunal orders: 1. SK and TK are to pay K Ltd $8,072.69 on or before 1 December 2023. This is calculated as follows: Balance owed by SK and TK for pool install $9,971.69 Less compensation for remedial work to the lawn $1,899.00 Total $8,072.69 2. The balance of the claim an...