12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2018] NZDT 1540 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT IC RESPONDENT'S INSURER J Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons [1] A car belonging to B (B) was parked in H Street, [Suburb] when it was hit by a car being driven by IC. B’s car was severely damaged by the collision and was written off....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 147 APPLICANT TT RESPONDENT BF RESPONDENT F Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT DF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 22 February 2017, TT entered into a property management agreement (the Management Agreement) with F Ltd for them to manage her property at [Address]. 2. For t...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 440 APPLICANT DM, ND and TM FIRST RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT NN F Ltd The Tribunal orders: NN and F Ltd are jointly and severally liable to pay $13,464.22 to the D Family Trust on or before 13 October 2023. Reasons 1. F Ltd (‘F’) leased commercial premises from the D Family Trust (‘the Trust’) under tw
...non-functional, the bottom vane was not opening and closing due to broken plastic, the indoor coil was only achieving 37 degrees on heat mode (the target being 45-52 degrees), and the refrigerant was low and banned for sale in New Zealand. 2. The applicants now claim $3,740.00 for the cost of a new heat pump since spare parts and refrigerant are not available to repair the old heat pump. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Was the heat pump in reasonable working order? b) If not,...
...presumption in the Act that costs lie where they fall unless incurred unnecessarily as a result of either bad faith or allegations that are without substantial merit. [2] The first, second and fourth respondents to these proceedings filed applications for costs. The application by the first respondents (“the Slaters”) was dismissed in my substantive decision delivered on 17 April 2009. The costs applications by the second and fourth respondents were filed on 5 May 2009....
...[2019] NZHRRT 15. Due to publication restrictions this decision has been anonymised by the redaction of the true name of the plaintiff.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2019] NZHRRT 15 2 Introduction [1] In June 2015, the plaintiff requested a copy of the investigation file into a complaint of rape made by her to the Police in 2014. The Police response to this request was the subject of an investigation by the Privacy Commissioner. A Certificate of Investigation dated...
...Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ohiti Waitio 1E No 3A Trust, Ngatarawa 1A3A Trust, Ngatarawa 1A3B Trust, Ngatarawa 1A3C Trust and Ngatarawa 2A3B1B2 Trust VIVIENNE MATENGA Applicant Hearings: 45 Tākitimu MB 118-140 dated 4 November 2015 (Heard at Hastings) Judgment: 9 December 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] On 10 September 2015 Vivienne Matenga filed an applicat...
...Ted Nia. Each of these ancestors has been chosen because of their association with the Treaty as signatories, and be cause they come from opposite ends of Te Ika a Maui, encompassing the whole island. The carvings are in the tiki or waka koiwi form. It was the artists' intention to pay homage to that carving tra dition, as well as to show the continuing development of that particular style. The waka koiwi style was also selected by the artists because it captures the spiritu...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 425 APPLICANT NC RESPONDENT KU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. On 1 March 2023, NC purchased a [car] from KU for $2,500.00. NC says KU misrepresented the car in the process of selling it to him and claims $1,614.03 made up of $500.00 to re-register the car, $371.23 to fix th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 221 APPLICANT Q Ltd RESPONDENT WO t/a AC The Tribunal orders: WO is to pay Q Ltd the total sum of $5,403.65 on or before Thursday 18 April 2024. Reasons: 1. At the request of the landlord BN, in June 2021 WO trading as AC engaged Q Ltd (the company) to oversee the interior fit out of its retail unit AC Restaurant, to help th...