Search Results

Search results for claim form.

12870 items matching your search terms

  1. O Ltd v MX & V Ltd [2023] NZDT 325 (20 July 2023) [pdf, 173 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 325 APPLICANT O Ltd RESPONDENT MX SECOND RESPONDENT V Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. U Ltd is removed as a respondent at the applicant’s request. 2. O Ltd is entitled to possession of the [car] and is therefore not liable to pay $4,500.00 to V Ltd purs...

  2. [2015] NZEmpC 155 Zonneveld (Labour Inspector) v Maudaara Limited [pdf, 80 KB]

    BRIDGET ZONNEVELD (LABOUR INSPECTOR) v MAUDAARA LIMITED NZEmpC CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 155 [10 September 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT CHRISTCHURCH [2015] NZEmpC 155 EMPC 238/2015 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file a challenge out of time BETWEEN BRIDGET ZONNEVELD (LABOUR INSPECTOR) Applicant AND MAUDAARA LIMITED Respondent Hearing: (on the papers filed 7 September 2015) Counsel: A McIlroy, couns...

  3. NM & TX & KC [2024] NZDT 758 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 758 APPLICANT NM APPLICANT TX RESPONDENT KC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. NM and TX own a home in [City] which shares a boundary with the home owned by KC. In July 2022 NM and TX say they were approached by KC’s father who also lives at the adjacent property. They say [KC’s father] noted con

  4. NE & HE v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 154 (1 May 2023) [pdf, 102 KB]

    ...of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 154 APPLICANT NE and HE RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicants obtained a quote from the respondent for a house removal. The quote was one of two obtained, and after negotiation, it was selected as the most cost effective. 2. The applicants verbally indicated their acceptance of the quote. A m...

  5. HL Ltd v AH [2023] NZDT 490 (17 October 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 490 APPLICANT HL Ltd RESPONDENT AH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HL Ltd operates an inner city superette. The director, TA, said that on 15 July 2023 AH came into the store, and as he was serving her, her son’s scooter collided into one of the shop windows and damaged it. He cla...

  6. EL v MN [2023] NZDT 738 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 176 KB]

    ...[Road A] onto [Road B], [City] heading towards [suburb]. The two lanes on his side of the road merged to one. At around where the lanes merge the front of EL’s car collided with the driver’s door of MN‘s car 2. EL and his insurer, K Ltd, claim $8,615.04 for the repair costs to EL’s car. EL has paid the excess under his insurance policy ($500.00) and the remaining repair costs have been paid by K Ltd 3. The issues to be resolved are: a) Did MN fail to give way to EL? b) Did...

  7. FN v Y Ltd [2024] NZDT 58 (12 February 2024) [pdf, 146 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 58 APPLICANT FN RESPONDENT Y Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. This order replaces my order of 2 February 2024. 2. Y Ltd is to pay FN $2999.00 on or before 5pm on 12 March 2024. 3. FN is to return the laptop to Y Ltd on or before 5pm on 13 March 2024. Reasons 1. I made a typographical error in my order of 2 February 2024. T...

  8. US Ltd v NH [2021] NZDT 1545 (16 September 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1545 APPLICANT US Ltd RESPONDENT NH The Tribunal orders: US Ltd is to pay NH a total of $8000.00 on or before Thursday 30 September 2021. Reasons: 1. On 27 March 2021, NH engaged US Ltd to supply and install a new .55 gauge Maxx colour steel roof at [Road] for $10,600.00 including GST. This included new underl...

  9. Feebee Investments Limited [2011] NZWHT Auckland 30 [pdf, 82 KB]

    1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6565: FEEBEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED – 7 BUTIA AVENUE, HENDERSON, AUCKLAND ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Feebee Investments Limited (Feebee) are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim under secti...

  10. S113-29-93-Appln-to-Determine-Successors-for-SILNA-Lands-Hawea-Wanaka.pdf [pdf, 407 KB]

    ...Hawea/Wanaka Substitute land (being Section 2 of 5 Block XIV, Lower Wanaka SD) The Ngāi Tahu Claims Settlement Act 1998, Section 455(1); Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993, Sections 29 and 113; and The Ngāi Tahu Deed of Settlement, Clause 15.6.2 Form 01 Rule 4.2, 16.1, 4.5, 10.9(2) For more information, email mlcsilna@justice.govt.nz WHAT IS THIS FORM FOR? This application form has been modified specifically for use in determining the successors for South Island Landless Natives...