TU v CH [2024] NZDT 819 (13 November 2024) [pdf, 149 KB]
...hearing by telephone conference but when CH was phoned he did not respond. 2. The absence of a respondent does not prevent the hearing from proceeding. 3. On 27 June 2024, TU purchased a second hand fridge from CH through [an online selling platform]. 4. TU paid $350.00 for the fridge. 5. The fridge frosted over repeatedly and destroyed a large amount of food. 6. TU rang CH with requested to have the fridge fixed, however, CH offered a replacement. 7. TU took the fault...