12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 503 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) In February 2023, the applicant bought a [vehicle] from the respondent. At the time of purchase the car had an odometer reading of 52,547 kilometres. 2) On or about 25 March 2024 the car broke down. The car was repaired, and the water pump nee...
...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] In the present case the statement of reply is due to be filed on 5 April 2018. [3] By memorandum dated 28 March 2018 the Commissioner of Pol...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 316 BETWEEN AEM Ltd APPLICANT AND ZVK RESPONDENT Date of Order: 1 June 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVK, pay the amount of $7,039.83 to the Applicant, AEM Ltd, on or before 15 June 2012. The counterclaim of the Respondent, AVK, is dismissed. Facts [1] The Applicant claims tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 62 APPLICANT XN RESPONDENT LD SECOND RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. LD must pay XN by $25,000.00 by 14 February 2023. 2. XN’s claim against S Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant owned a [car]. The applicant had owned the car for a number of years and spent time and money restoring the...
...on the chairs were showing signs of deterioration as the powder coating was chipping away, exposing the metal. At EG Ltd’s request, LF and SF returned to the chairs for a physical warranty assessment, after which EG Ltd reported that any warranty claim was declined as the damage was deemed to have occurred as a result of wear and tear, or a result of the chairs being stacked. LF and SF rejected EG Ltd’s offer to return the chairs and supply a pen which could be used to cover up the scr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 489 APPLICANT NT RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to pay NT the sum of $150.00 on or before Tuesday 17 October 2023. Reasons: 1. On 18 December 2022, NT purchased a return ticket from J Ltd for travel [City] /[Town 1] at a price of $174.99, comprising $91.00 for the outgoing leg and $79.00 for the re...
...Copies to: TR Hetaraka & DL Doney 9 Old North Road, Orewa 0931 135 Taitokerau MB 21 Introduction [1] On 6 April 2016, Tuari Hetaraka and Dianne Doney filed an application on behalf of the Ngāti Taimanawaiti Māori Incorporation seeking an injunction in relation to Lot 2, Deposited Plan 29547, Computer Freehold Register NA815/273 (“Lot 2”). [2] On 4 May 2016, the Registrar refused to accept the
...respondent has admitted failing her client in respect of each charge as follows: (a) Misconduct (i) Having been instructed in February 2011 to commence proceedings to recover a debt of $44,382.77, she failed to file in time a notice of pursuit of claim such that the proceedings came to an end apart from a counterclaim that had been filed by the defendant to the claim. 3 (ii) She did not advise the client that the claim was at an end and that the counterclaim was the only...
...compensation of $20,000.00 to Joseph. [7] Since the house was owned by Hariata Kingsnorth and succession to Hariata had not yet occurred, I stated that if those entitled to succeed to Hariata wished to vest the house in the whānau trust, an application together with consents could be filed within one month and the orders could be made accordingly. I note that no such application was filed. [8] The applicant now seeks an award of costs against the Hariata Kingsnorth Whānau Tru...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 428 APPLICANT & COUNTERCLAIM RESPONDENT SM RESPONDENT & COUNTERCLAIM APPLICANT KK APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: KK is to pay J Ltd the sum of $10,287.80 within 28 days of the date of this order. The counterclaim by KK is dismissed. Reasons...