12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 622 APPLICANT MX APPLICANT MY RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: F Ltd is to pay MX and MY as trustees of the M Trust $6941.29 on or before Friday 8 December 2023. Reasons: 1. In November 2021, the Applicants accepted a quote from F Ltd (the company) for $9,327.00, reduced by $1000.00 from the original quote of $10,327.00. T...
1 [2011] NZWHT AUCKLAND 30 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive’s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6565: FEEBEE INVESTMENTS LIMITED – 7 BUTIA AVENUE, HENDERSON, AUCKLAND ELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL The Claim [1] Feebee Investments Limited (Feebee) are the owners of a leaky home. They filed a claim under secti...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 687 APPLICANT MK & NK RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay $1748.00 to MK and NK on or before 31 January 2024 and the balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In May 2022, MK and NK engaged B Ltd to re-roof their commercially-tenanted house in [Suburb]. MK and NK accepted B Ltd’s written quotation for $...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1347 APPLICANT MD RESPONDENT O Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MD sent a computer to her daughter using a courier service through her employer. MD’s employer has a book of postal credits associated with the return of magazine ‘headers’ for audit purposes. MD sent the compu...
...The deduction was made pursuant to the provisions of s 70 of the Social Security Act 1964. Background [3] The appellant was granted New Zealand Superannuation at the Living Alone rate from 16 January 2014. We understand that at the time of her application she was in receipt of a Sickness Benefit and had been in receipt of this benefit since 2009. [4] As part of the application requirements the appellant was required to make an application for a pension from the United Kingdom, as she...
LCRO 7/2012 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Wellington Standards Committee BETWEEN ND Of Auckland Applicant AND VC Of Auckland Respondent The names and indentifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] Mr ND (the Applicant) had sent an invoice to A for services rendered....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 569 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: P Ltd is to pay $18,000.00 to D Ltd on or before 29 November 2023. Reasons 1. D Ltd supplied archaeology and heritage services in relation to a commercial property at [Address]. At the time D Ltd was engaged, excavation works were being undertaken at the property as p...
...LCRO 127/2010 CONCERNING An application for review pursuant to Section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Canterbury-Westland Standards Committee 1 BETWEEN FD Of Auckland Applicant AND VG of Christchurch Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Application for review [1] In December 2009, Mr FD (the Applicant) complained...
...Fourth Respondent (Removed) AND BARRY WALSH Fifth Respondent AND BRETT MCWILLIAMS Sixth Respondent AND WEI WEI ZHANG Seventh Respondent PROCEDURAL ORDER 7 Dated 20 August 2010 Application for removal by the Waitakere City Council and Doug Kaill 1. The Waitakere City Council and Doug Kaill have both applied to be removed as parties to this claim. Doug Kaill’s company Design and Build Co Limited did the design...
...dealt with on the papers filed, and in light of oral submissions advanced during the course of a telephone conference on 4 February 2022. The three applications are: an application by the plaintiff for leave to amend their statement of claim; an application by the plaintiff to exclude a document from the bundle; and an application by the plaintiff to exclude two paragraphs from a witness’s brief of evidence on the basis that they contain inadmissible statements. I deal w...