Search Results

1. Te Manutukutuku Issue 12 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   ...Ted Nia. Each of these ancestors has been chosen because of their association with the Treaty as signatories, and be­ cause they come from opposite ends of Te Ika a Maui, encompassing the whole island. The carvings are in the tiki or waka koiwi form. It was the artists' intention to pay homage to that carving tra­ dition, as well as to show the continuing development of that particular style. The waka koiwi style was also selected by the artists because it captures the spiritu...

2. HO & KT v QN Ltd [2021] NZDT 1708 (21 December 2021) [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...notice and following up that the tenant had received notice, the Tenancy Tribunal ordered immediate termination of the tenancy on 2 July 2021, upholding that the proper 90 days’ notice had been given. 10. MW, QN Ltd’s property manager for the applicants’ property (until she left in late May 2021 and UJ took over) spoke at the hearing as a witness and stated that, in the first month after giving the tenant notice, she managed to talk to him in person once after multiple attempts a...

3. IL v BG [2023] NZDT 449 (18 August 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   ...agreed to reduce IL’s rent to $195 per week. 19. She, therefore, claims that she should be at least refunded the extra payments between 3 April and 21 May when she vacated her room. 20. I am not satisfied that the contract was amended as claimed by IL. This is because IL’s email before the Tribunal dated 30 March 2023 indicates that she made a unilateral decision to reduce her rent to $195. Her email starts as follows: As mentioned on WhatsApp (0n 26/3/23), I will begin payi...

4. Ruka - Taheke 23 A (2012) 2012 Chief Judge's MB 416 (2012 CJ 416) [pdf, 192 KB]

   ...IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT 2012 Chief Judge's MB 416 (2012 CJ 416) A20110006182 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Taheke 23A BETWEEN FIONA REIHANA RUKA Applicant Judgment: 6 September 2012 DECISION OF CHIEF JUDGE WW ISAAC 2012 Chief Judge’s MB 417 [1] This application filed by Fiona Rei...

5. LT Ltd v IU [2024] NZDT 531 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 227 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 531 APPLICANT LT Limited RESPONDENT IU The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In 2020, 2021, and 2022, LT Ltd says it was contracted by TC to supply staff Christmas hampers at [City 1], [Suburb], and [City 2] hospitals. Terms of these arrangements were agreed over a series of emails, rather than a formal, s...

6. ND Ltd v TS Ltd [2023] NZDT 101 (3 April 2023). [pdf, 191 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 101 APPLICANT ND Ltd RESPONDENT TS Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT BG Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT SQ The Tribunal orders: 1. TS Ltd is to pay ND Ltd $2,040.00 on or before 12 May 2023. 2. The claims against BG Ltd and SQ are dismissed. Reasons: 1. ND Ltd hired a vehicle from TS Ltd. Durin...

7. D Ltd v JD & WD [2022] NZDT 174 (3 November 2022) [pdf, 154 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 174 APPLICANT D Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT JD SECOND RESPONDENT WD The Tribunal orders, on the claim and counter-claim: JD and WD are jointly and severally liable to pay $1277.40 to D Ltd on or before 1 December 2022. Reasons 1. D Ltd supplied carpet to Mr and Mrs D in March 2019 for the upstairs and st...

8. [2021] NZEmpC 47 Pan v Juyi International Ltd [pdf, 171 KB]

   ...proceeding has needed to seek such leave. In my judgment of 15 March 2021, I granted leave to Mr Pan to bring a late non-de novo challenge.1 1 Juyi International Ltd v Pan [2021] NZEmpC 28. [3] I directed that Mr Pan file a statement of claim by 18 March 2021. That application was, ultimately, not opposed by Juyi. [4] Juyi’s statement of defence in respect of that claim was due on 24 March 2021. An attempt to take this step was not undertaken until the next day....

9. [2019] NZEmpC 92 Samuels v Employment Relations Authority [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...SAMUELS v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2019] NZEmpC 92 [5 August 2019] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2019] NZEmpC 92 EMPC 68/2018 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for an unless order BETWEEN ROLAND SAMUELS Applicant AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND CAROLYN L...

10. DC v JBD Ltd [2021] NZDT 1379 (11 March 2021) [pdf, 203 KB]

    ...RN APPLICANT RI APPLICANT SB APPLICANT YE RESPONDENT JBD Limited The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS: Brief Details of Claim CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 1. In 2006, the ten applicants formed an art collective named BD. Over time, the collective purchased a number of paintings. On or about 2016, BD decided to sell all of its paintings. BD arranged with JBD Ltd (JBD) to sell the paintings through JBD’s gallery in...