13202 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1522 APPLICANT TJ RESPONDENT HH SECOND RESPONDENT GH The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. HH and GH, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $4,000.00 to TJ on or before Thursday 25 July 2019. 2. Once payment has been made, TJ is to return the necklace to HH within 7 days by hand delivery, courier, o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 91 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal orders: SB is to pay QD $520.00 on or before 18 March 2024. Reasons 1. SB operates an art gallery in [Town] known as the [Gallery]. QD is an artist in the area who on occasion has placed items with the gallery for sale. QD also worked sometimes as a volunteer. QD’s painting [The painting]...
...made redundant from the Police on 6 February 2015. After concluding her employment with the Police Ms Wise made a number of information privacy requests leading up to an information privacy request dated 19 June 2018 which is the subject of this claim. [2] Ms Wise did not receive a response to her information privacy request until 29 August 2019, which was after she had filed her claim in this Tribunal. 1 [This decision is to be cited...
...if a guilty plea is entered at or before the hearing Reporting to and invoicing Legal Aid Criminal Simplification Project Steps – August 2012 Page 8 Granting Notes Documentation Requirements Application for Criminal Legal Aid (LA form 1) [s14 Legal Services Act 2011] Criminal Legal Aid Amendment to Grant (LA form 2) [s28 Legal Services Act 2011] – if the time required for the step is expected to exceed the guideline hours stated Criminal Legal Aid Guilty Plea Tax I...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 553 APPLICANT UC Limited RESPONDENT BD Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UC Ltd was represented at the hearing by SX and BD Limited was represented by HT. 2. UC Ltd laid concrete supplied by BD Limited on a driveway of a property which was a development done by UC Ltd. UC Ltd says there w...
...under the Housing Improvement Regulations 1947. [5] On 12 May 2023, the Committee issued its decision on the penalty orders. It reprimanded both the licensees and ordered the second respondent to pay a fine of $2,000. As for the appellant’s claim for compensation of more than $240,000, the Committee found it had no power to award compensation and it declined to refer the issue of compensation to the Tribunal as the unsatisfactory conduct was at the lower end of the scale and r...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 132 APPLICANT XS RESPONDENT UQ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: UQ is to pay $8,100.42 to B Ltd by 7 April 2024. Note: The parties appeared by teleconference for the hearing. UQ was disconnected from the call after being warned about her continuous use of offensive language and her i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 554 APPLICANT GT RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GT purchased her daughter’s school uniform from O Ltd. In December 2023 she purchased a size 12 skirt, and after taking it home realised that it did not fit her daughter. GT returned the skirt to O Ltd, swapped it for a size 14 and purchased...
1 A Particulars of Claim The following information should be included in the final particulars of claim filed to support the claim. If this information has already been filed with the claim documents and does not need changing or adding to there is no need to provide it again. More often however there has been the addition and / or removal of parties or changes to the amounts being claimed. In addition additional information has become available throughout the a...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...