12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 500 APPLICANT HE RESPONDENT G Ltd The Tribunal orders: G Ltd is to pay HE $5,394.08 on or before 11 October 2023. Reasons Introduction 1. In September 2022, HE booked a holiday for himself and his wife to travel to [City 1] in May 2023. The purpose of the holiday was to surprise and treat his wife who had recently...
(Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 481 APPLICANT TU RESPONDENT TG Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT SC The Tribunal orders: 1. TG Ltd is to pay the sum of $13,657.79 to TU on or before 6 July 2024. 2. The claim against SC is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 20 May 2020, TU signed an agreement to lease a new [car] from TG Limited trading as SF for a period of three years. The lease required a weekly re
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 33 APPLICANT OB RESPONDENT BB APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) X Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed as liability has not been established against either driver. Reasons 1. In October 2020, BB and the driver of OB’s car, BH, were both driving in the same direction down [Road A], with BB’s c...
...Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee, Director of Human Rights Proceedings, for plaintiff Mr Van Wijk in person Mr JLS Shaw for second and third defendants DATE OF ACCESS HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL FILE: 5 March 2019 DECISION OF CHAIRPERSON GRANTING ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL FILE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as A v Van Wijk (Access...
...against him and victimised him in breach of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) as they threatened to trespass him from the store and tried to provoke him into an altercation so he could be trespassed. [2] In response to Mr Brown’s claim, PEL filed an application to strike-out the claim. The basis of the PEL’s strike-out application is that the claim discloses no reasonable 1 [This decision is to be cited as Brown v Progressive Enterprises Ltd (Strike-Out) [2024] NZHRRT 10.] 2 P...
...Judgeꞌs MB 188 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20090017831 CJ 2009/48 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Rangi Kaiamokura BETWEEN TUTEA SMALLMAN Applicant Judgment: 19 March 2015 DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2015 Chief Judgeꞌs MB 189 Introduction [1] This application filed by Tuatea Smallman (the applicant)...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1402 APPLICANT NU RESPONDENT TE The Tribunal orders: NU’s claim against TE is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 22 April 2020 NU purchased an Audi S4 vehicle from TE. Prior to purchase TE told NU that the vehicle was in good condition apart from that the keyless entry was not working. TE advised NU that he could purcha...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 206 APPLICANT HX RESPONDENT NM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. HX and NM are neighbours with a shared driveway (the driveway belongs to HX but there is an easement over it giving NM’s property use of the driveway). NM’s property was created as a result of a subdivision undertaken by HX. 2. NM purchase...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 727 APPLICANT DI RESPONDENT UM The Tribunal orders: DI is to pay $3,109.65 to UM by 10 October 2024. Reasons Are the parties bound by the quote for work? 1. DI contracted UM to quote for bathroom renovation work at her rental property. UM provided DI with a quote. The quote document included details of how UM had priced the work....
...plaintiff’s alleged reliance upon a letter of intent, a contract executed after he resigned employment, and a statement by his then supervisor. The representation by the supervisor is alleged to have promised payment of part or all of the sums claimed under the previous three claims. There is uncertainty as to remedies claimed under the fourth claim as no prayer for relief attaches to it. In addition a schedule is referred to in the body of the amended statement of claim but is n...