Search Results

1. ET Ltd v District Council [2021] NZDT 1317 (20 January 2021) [pdf, 224 KB]

   ...Occupy Site 1 was issued to that person. 9. ETL lodged a claim with the Disputes Tribunal seeking $15,000 (now increased to $30,000) for loss of income from Site 1. 10. District Council defends the claim on the basis that a contract had not been formed with ETL because a fresh Licence or a variation of ETL’s existing Licence had not been processed for ETL to occupy Site 1 instead of Site 2. District Council argued that even if a contract had been formed, District Council dispute...

2. KC v BS [2019] NZDT 1399 (17 May 2019) [pdf, 134 KB]

   ...$4375.42 from BS, being the amount that was owing to the Local Council at settlement in October 2015, some of which has since been paid to the Local Council and some of which is not yet due. 4. The issues to determine are: • Was the S Programme information disclosed to KC prior to the contract being formed? • Is BS in breach of the vendor’s warranty at clause 6.2(3) of the sale and purchase agreement? • Is BS in breach of the vendor’s warranty at clause 6.1(1) of the sal...

3. 1.-Full-List-of-Fee-Changes-23-July.pdf [pdf, 366 KB]

   ...to the court under any enactment $540 $702 3 Filing any other initiating document (as defined in regulation 4), unless a different filing fee is prescribed for that document elsewhere in the fees table $1,350 $1,755 4 Filing a statement of claim between defendants $110 $143 5 Filing an amended statement of claim $110 $143 6 Interlocutory application (a) without notice (b) on notice relating to a proceeding to which item 2, 3, 46 or 48 applies (c) with notice (a) $200 (b) $...

4. UX v J Ltd [2023] NZDT 105 (16 March 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   ...orderliness of UX’s farm workshop area. (g) I have considered the evidence given orally at the hearing by SC, one of J Ltd’s customers who has had three UTV machines on his farm, two of which are currently still in use. SC said that the machines had performed well for him, and in his opinion were superior to similar machines of other brands in respect of brakes, wheel bearings and ball joints. However, I have to make my decision in respect of the evidence relating to the failures with...

5. Te Rau o te Tika: Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry (Wai 3060)

   ...the Waitangi Tribunal’s website search function – filter by inquiry, then select Te Rau o te Tika. Here is information about progress of the Inquiry: Events | Waitangi Tribunal. Some claimants in the Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry may choose to request their personal information from government agencies so that they can include it in their evidence to the Inquiry. This factsheet provides information about how you can request your personal information from government agencies:Factsheet f...

   Located in:

   1. Justice sector & policy

6. [2021] NZACC 1 - Sharma v ACC (5 January 2021) [pdf, 244 KB]

   ...covered personal injury. She received social rehabilitation as well as lump sum compensation. [22] On 20 June 2018, Ms Sharma was granted cover for adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy as a treatment injury. [23] On 27 June 2018, Ms Sharma requested weekly compensation on the basis that her covered treatment injury had incapacitated her from her work as a real estate 5 agent from 1 April 2014. A letter from Patel & Associates Ltd, Chartered Accountants, dated 21 June...

7. CX v A Ltd [2019] NZDT 1336 (16 June 2019) [pdf, 209 KB]

   ...year. CX has paid $6 to A Ltd (which he notes is twice the $3 fee he would have had to pay had he obtained a ticket) and has filed this claim with the Tribunal seeking a declaration that he is not liable to pay the remaining $59 (although in the claim form the sum he noted was the entire $65). 2. The issues I need to decide are: a. Was it a condition of a contract between CX and A Ltd that $65 would have to be paid if he did not obtain a ticket? b. If so, is $65 a sum that can be c...

8. W v D [2019] NZDT 1362 (29 November 2019) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...What remedy, if any, is available to Mr W? 10. For the reasons above, I find that no remedy is available to Mr W and the claim is dismissed. Referee: Date: 29 November 2019 CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply

9. CH v JJ [2022] NZDT 97 (10 August 2022) [pdf, 170 KB]

   ...The applicant has not provided the Tribunal with any evidence the supply and installation of the oven was unsatisfactory. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 10 August 2022 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

10. UC v QG RG [2023] NZDT 120 (8 March 2023) [pdf, 202 KB]

    ...that QG breached the contract by not paying the mating fee and selling two dogs without desexing them, an order is made for the amount of his claim being $15,000.00. Referee: K Cowie DTR Date: 8 March 2023 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...