Search Results

1. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...

2. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...

3. ES v LQ & TQ [2023] NZDT 79 (16 March 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 79 APPLICANT (And Cross- Respondent) ES RESPONDENT LQ SECOND RESPONDENT (And Cross- Applicant) TQ The Tribunal orders: 1. LQ and TQ are to pay $342.00 to ES on or before 6 April 2023. 2. The claim by TQ against ES is dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. In October 2021, ES purchased a tiny...

4. Wise v Commissioner of Police [2020] NZHRRT 44 [pdf, 169 KB]

   ...made redundant from the Police on 6 February 2015. After concluding her employment with the Police Ms Wise made a number of information privacy requests leading up to an information privacy request dated 19 June 2018 which is the subject of this claim. [2] Ms Wise did not receive a response to her information privacy request until 29 August 2019, which was after she had filed her claim in this Tribunal. 1 [This decision is to be cited...

5. H Ltd v T Ltd & Ors [2023] NZDT 700 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 700 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT NX THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT B Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (for T Ltd) XX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd were contracted by NX to build a house. NX contracted separately with B Ltd for the house plans. H Ltd contracted...

6. N Ltd v P Ltd [2024] NZDT 751 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...rebate of $3,300.00 for disruption to its business. P Ltd disputes the claim. 2. The relevant provision in the lease is ‘Partial Destruction’ which says at 27.1 3. If the premises or any portion of the building of which the premises may form part shall be damaged but not so as to render the premises untenantable ... the landlord shall with all reasonable speed expend all the insurance moneys received by the landlord in respect of such damage towards repairing such damage or rein...

7. NG & UG v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 502 (30 August 2023) [pdf, 107 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 502 APPLICANT NG and UG RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,676.59 to NG and UG on or before 14 September 2023. Reasons: 1. On 30 December 2020, NG and UG entered into an agreement for B Ltd to manage their rental property. The agreement provided for termination by either party on thr

8. MW v Accident Compensation Corporation (Independance Allowance) [2022] NZACC 207 [pdf, 239 KB]

   ...JUDGMENT OF JUDGE DENESE HENARE [Independence Allowance Schedule 1 Part 4 Accident Insurance Act 1998; ss 48,51,52– Accident Compensation Act 2001] ___________________________________________________________________________ [1] The appellant claims that his independence allowance payable for a mental injury consequent on a physical injury should be backdated to the date of his physical injuries in 2000. The position of the Corporation is that the independence allowance has been p...

9. KM & MM v WN & DN [2024] NZDT 577 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...situations where there is property damage, loss or injury. Property injury does not include damage to personal health, nor visual pollution. Nor is it pure economic loss in the absence of any actual property damage/loss. 8. In this case, the Applicants do not allege any physical property loss or damage. Instead their claim solely concerns the impact on their personal health, the visual impact and a ‘potential’ economic loss which might arise. Consequently I find that the Tribunal...

10. KM & OM v S Ltd [2023] NZDT 485 (27 September 2023) [pdf, 94 KB]

    ...S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay KM & OM $50.00 on or before Wednesday, 18 October 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicants seek a partial refund following their booking of holiday accommodation [Town] in June 2023. The applicants seek a refund of $588.00 claiming the booked rental was misrepresented to them. In particular the applicants claim that when they...