Search Results

1. Sharma v Manchanda [2018] NZIACDT 2 (2 February 2018) [pdf, 196 KB]

   ...process for determining the complaint. [2] The essence of the complaint arises from the following events: [2.1] First, Mr Manchanda was asked to assist the complainant in urgent circumstances (her visa was due to expire in a few days’ time). The application Mr Manchanda prepared was a failed lodgement with Immigration New Zealand (INZ), due to the absence of a current police certificate; [2.2] At that point, the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully and had limited options...

2. Toia v Corrections (Jurisdiction) [2018] NZHRRT 46 [pdf, 299 KB]

   ...[1.1] Failing to provide him with an unredacted copy of an email read (in part) to the High Court by counsel for Corrections in the course of civil litigation brought by Mr Toia against Corrections. It is claimed such failure was a breach of information privacy principle 6 (IPP 6). [1.2] Failing to correct the content of the email. It is claimed such failure breached information privacy principle 7 (IPP 7). [2] In this decision rulings are given on preliminary issues relating to st

3. NE & LE v IN & KC & CN [2020 NZDT 1537 (20 July 2020) [pdf, 93 KB]

   ...non-functional, the bottom vane was not opening and closing due to broken plastic, the indoor coil was only achieving 37 degrees on heat mode (the target being 45-52 degrees), and the refrigerant was low and banned for sale in New Zealand. 2. The applicants now claim $3,740.00 for the cost of a new heat pump since spare parts and refrigerant are not available to repair the old heat pump. 3. The issues to be determined are: a) Was the heat pump in reasonable working order? b) If not,...

4. Practice Note 5 2018 Final [pdf, 369 KB]

   ...10. DATABASE OF DECISIONS 2 PREAMBLE This Practice Note is issued pursuant to section 220(2)(a) of the Immigration Act 2009 (“the Act”). It is effective for all appeals and matters determined by the Tribunal. The following information on the practice and procedure adopted by the Immigration and Protection Tribunal (“the Tribunal”) in relation to the publication of its decisions is designed to provide guidance to members of the legal profession, immigration

5. G Ltd v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 506 (25 June 2024) [pdf, 107 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 506 APPLICANT G Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. C Ltd, a company registered in [Country], engaged G Ltd in August 2023 to carry out building work in a commercial premises in which C Ltd were opening a baby spa business. 2. G Ltd provided an estimate for $58,103.75 inc.GST and said ‘extr...

6. BC v BT [2021] NZDT 1625 (12 July 2021) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1625 APPLICANT BC RESPONDENT BT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. BC purchased a [laptop] in December 2015. In September 2019 the laptop was not charging. BC took the laptop for repair. The BT agent tested the battery, cleaned the laptop inside, did a CMS and NVRAM reset, then...

7. BE v TU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1568 (29 July 2021) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1568 APPLICANT BE RESPONDENT TU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reason 1. On 14 May 2021 BE’s car was towed from a private parking area. He paid $320.00 to recover the car. Today he is claiming the $320.00 saying the signage was unclear, he was not aware he could not park his car where he did, th...

8. IT v UO [2021] NZDT 1578 (11 August 2021) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1578 APPLICANT IT RESPONDENT UO The Tribunal orders: UO is to pay the sum of $2,568.10 to IT on or before Wednesday 25 August 2021. Reasons: 1. On 15 December 2020, IT and another person entered into an agreement to purchase a property at [address], from UO and another person for $550,000.00. Settlement took place...

9. N Ltd v C Ltd [2024] NZDT 307 (9 May 2024) [pdf, 92 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 307 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT C Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by N Ltd against C Ltd is proved. C Ltd is to pay N Ltd $18,205.79 on or before 5:00 pm on 30 May 2024. Reasons: 1. N Ltd provides ventilation services. N Ltd claims against C Ltd for two payments made in error in a total sum of $18,205.79. 2. The issues to be...

10. Matenga - Ohiti Waitio 1E No3A Trust (2015) 45 Takitimu MB 184 (45 TKT 184) [pdf, 369 KB]

    ...Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Ohiti Waitio 1E No 3A Trust, Ngatarawa 1A3A Trust, Ngatarawa 1A3B Trust, Ngatarawa 1A3C Trust and Ngatarawa 2A3B1B2 Trust VIVIENNE MATENGA Applicant Hearings: 45 Tākitimu MB 118-140 dated 4 November 2015 (Heard at Hastings) Judgment: 9 December 2015 RESERVED JUDGMENT OF JUDGE L R HARVEY Introduction [1] On 10 September 2015 Vivienne Matenga filed an applicat...