Search Results

1. FH v UO Ltd [2023] NZDT 16 (25 February 2023) [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 16 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT UO Ltd The Tribunal orders: UO Ltd is to pay FH $570.00 on or before 16 March 2023. Reasons 1. In 2021, FH bought tickets for a Guns n Roses concert from UO Ltd for $570.00. The concert was originally to be held in November 2021 but was postponed because of the Covid pandemic. The new date wa...

2. LB v VB Ltd [2022] NZDT 123 (25 August 2022) [pdf, 106 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 123 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT VB Ltd The Tribunal orders: VB Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,000.00 to LB by no later than 23 September 2022. Reasons: 1. LB claims he purchased a car from VB Ltd for $69,000 on 5 May 2021. The vehicle was purchased with finance of $39,000 from NUG. The balance of the purchase price...

3. QU v TW [2024] NZDT 311 (14 May 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 311 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT TW APPLICANT'S INSURER Q Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QU claims that in November 2023 TW collided into her parked car. Her car had a market value of $10,500.00, and was written off, and she reached a settlement with her insurer receiving payment of $9,900....

4. EJ v ND & CG [2024] NZDT 400 (7 June 2024) [pdf, 180 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

5. Greenslade v Commissioner of Police (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 11 [pdf, 74 KB]

   ...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] In the present case the statement of reply is due to be filed on 5 April 2018. [3] By memorandum dated 28 March 2018 the Commissioner of Pol...

6. DE v SC [2023] NZDT 499 (10 October 2023) [pdf, 205 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 499 APPLICANT DE RESPONDENT SC APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. SC and DE were involved in an accident at the intersection of [Street 1] and [Street 2] on 26 November 2022. 2. The accident took place at night, in rainy condition...

7. EU v UX [2023] NZDT 313 (23 June 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 313 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT UX The Tribunal orders: UX is to pay the sum of $4,990.00 to EU on or before Friday 13 July 2023. Reasons: 1. In December 2022, UX (the supplier) provided a written quotation to EU (the consumer) to supply and install a 5m electronic driveway gate for $10,887.00. The consumer paid...

8. MM v N Ltd [2024] NZDT 503 (8 August 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 503 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) In February 2023, the applicant bought a [vehicle] from the respondent. At the time of purchase the car had an odometer reading of 52,547 kilometres. 2) On or about 25 March 2024 the car broke down. The car was repaired, and the water pump nee...

9. AEM v ZVK [2012] NZDT 316 (1 June 2012) [pdf, 80 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2012] NZDT 316 BETWEEN AEM Ltd APPLICANT AND ZVK RESPONDENT Date of Order: 1 June 2012 Referee: Referee Reuvecamp ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the Respondent, ZVK, pay the amount of $7,039.83 to the Applicant, AEM Ltd, on or before 15 June 2012. The counterclaim of the Respondent, AVK, is dismissed. Facts [1] The Applicant claims tha...

10. XN v LD & S Ltd [2023] NZDT 62 (17 January) 2023 [pdf, 196 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 62 APPLICANT XN RESPONDENT LD SECOND RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. LD must pay XN by $25,000.00 by 14 February 2023. 2. XN’s claim against S Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The applicant owned a [car]. The applicant had owned the car for a number of years and spent time and money restoring the...