Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. OH Ltd v NI Ltd [2020] NZDT 1320 (30 September 2020) [pdf, 194 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1320 APPLICANT OH Limited RESPONDENT NI Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. OH Limited (OH) supplies and maintains [redacted] automatic door systems to commercial premises, including a number of [redacted] supermarkets. The contracts involve installation of the doors and the payment...

2. BQ v BC [2024] NZDT 120 (12 March 2024) [pdf, 211 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 120 APPLICANT BQ RESPONDENT BC The Tribunal orders: BC is to pay the sum of $10,470.00 to BQ by no later than 29 March 2024. Reasons: 1. BQ and BC met on a dating site in February 2023. Both described their relationship as being friends. BQ claims BC had financial issues and that he asked her for money to assist him with rent,...

3. CD & ors v CU Ltd [2024] NZDT 508 (23 June 2024) [pdf, 145 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 508 APPLICANT CD C/- LC Family Trust APPLICANT LD C/- LC Family Trust APPLICANT QG C/- LC Family Trust RESPONDENT CU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LD, CD and QC are the trustees (the trustees) of the LC Family Trust and own as trustees the property at [address]

4. M Ltd v SN & LL [2023] NZDT 742 (13 December 2023) [pdf, 204 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 742 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT SN LL The Tribunal orders: LL and SN must pay M Ltd $2,466.00 by 4pm on 17 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant is a mortgage broker and arranged mortgage financing for the respondents with a third party lender. The respondents moved their mortgage finance to an...

5. Te Manutukutuku Issue 28 [pdf, 584 KB]

   Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau rna waru Pipiri 1994 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number 28 June 1994 CLAIMS IN HEARING Chathams W AI 64 The Moriori inquiry was opened in the Chatham Islands 9-13 May, and continued the following week, 16-20 May, in Wellington. The claim concerns the failure of the Crown to recognise and protect Moriori customary rights to land and fisheries on Chatham and outlying islands...

6. QH Ltd v XD Ltd [2022] NZDT 98 (1 September 2022) [pdf, 138 KB]

   ...(‘CCLA’)? • What is payable by XD Ltd, if anything, under the contract? Did XD Ltd accept the goods provided by QH Ltd as per the Sale of Goods provisions in the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (‘CCLA’)? 9. As soon as the contract was formed, the boxes became the property of XD Ltd, irrespective of the arrangement to deliver some or all of the boxes at a later date (as per section 146 of the CCLA). 10. Section 170(1)(b) and (c) of the CCLA provides that:- �...

7. FX v KQ [2023] NZDT 538 (29 September 2023) [pdf, 188 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 538 APPLICANT FX RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. KQ was engaged on contract to FX for a period of around 1.5 years. KQ’s contract was terminated in May 2023. 2. In July 2023, FX contacted KQ seeking a refund for discounted treatments KQ had given to family and others at a...

8. TJ v HH [2019] NZDT 1522 (11 July 2019) [pdf, 154 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1522 APPLICANT TJ RESPONDENT HH SECOND RESPONDENT GH The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. HH and GH, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $4,000.00 to TJ on or before Thursday 25 July 2019. 2. Once payment has been made, TJ is to return the necklace to HH within 7 days by hand delivery, courier, o...

9. Wano v Ngati Hineuru Iwi Incorporated (2013) 24 Takitimu MB 56 (24 TKT 56) [pdf, 205 KB]

   ...[14] Ms Edmunds further submitted that the proposed amendment to the application should be refused. Mr Wano cannot rely on s 30(1)(a) of the Act, it was argued because the exercise of the Courts function under this subsection requires written request advice to the Chief Judge from a court, commission or tribunal (s 30(1)(b)). No such request has been made. Submissions for the Crown [15] Counsel for the Crown submitted that the Court does not have a general supervisory function...

10. SB v QD [2024] NZDT 91 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 95 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 91 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal orders: SB is to pay QD $520.00 on or before 18 March 2024. Reasons 1. SB operates an art gallery in [Town] known as the [Gallery]. QD is an artist in the area who on occasion has placed items with the gallery for sale. QD also worked sometimes as a volunteer. QD’s painting [The painting]...