11127 items matching your search terms
...damage occurred some 9 months later. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 3 Conclusion 8. For the reasons above MS’s claim is dismissed. Referee: Ms Gayatri Jaduram Date: 20 March 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a re...
...because they clearly service commercial buildings a reasonable person would be aware the spaces are not for the general public to park in. 5. I have considered whether $396.55 is a reasonable cost. I am aware from numerous claims the cost to perform a private tow to the towing companies yard is more than a point-to-point tow. The tow company must cover the cost of insurance, storage the cost of monitoring the carparks. The amount charged is consistent with rates charged by other tow c...
...reconnecting the power would not cause a safety hazard. 8. I therefore conclude that the respondents are liable to pay $2,466.75 to the applicant. Referee: E Paton-Simpson Date: 20 August 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
...9. For the reasons set out in para (4) of this order, BG is not a personal guarantor and does not owe KH $2,326.66 in legal costs. The claim is dismissed. Referee: K O’Shea Date: 29 May 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe
...policy. The effect of conditional settlement agreements [36] An insurer and homeowner had agreed to a settlement with conditions allowing for an additional payment should enhanced foundations be required once the rebuild was underway. The homeowner requested, and the insurer granted four extensions to complete the foundation assessment. A fifth request for an extension was declined, and the homeowner applied to the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the insurer was not required to g...
...covered personal injury. She received social rehabilitation as well as lump sum compensation. [22] On 20 June 2018, Ms Sharma was granted cover for adriamycin-induced cardiomyopathy as a treatment injury. [23] On 27 June 2018, Ms Sharma requested weekly compensation on the basis that her covered treatment injury had incapacitated her from her work as a real estate 5 agent from 1 April 2014. A letter from Patel & Associates Ltd, Chartered Accountants, dated 21 June...
...orderliness of UX’s farm workshop area. (g) I have considered the evidence given orally at the hearing by SC, one of J Ltd’s customers who has had three UTV machines on his farm, two of which are currently still in use. SC said that the machines had performed well for him, and in his opinion were superior to similar machines of other brands in respect of brakes, wheel bearings and ball joints. However, I have to make my decision in respect of the evidence relating to the failures with...
...the Waitangi Tribunal’s website search function – filter by inquiry, then select Te Rau o te Tika. Here is information about progress of the Inquiry: Events | Waitangi Tribunal. Some claimants in the Justice System Kaupapa Inquiry may choose to request their personal information from government agencies so that they can include it in their evidence to the Inquiry. This factsheet provides information about how you can request your personal information from government agencies:Factsheet f...
...provided in July to August 2022 in relation to the fire aspects of a Council Notice to Fix a three-storey building at [Address]. NC is the owner or trustee owner of the building, and B Ltd claims that it was initially instructed by her agent, BD. BD informed B Ltd on 28 July 2022 that his agency had been terminated, but B Ltd claims to have done some further work in following days dealing with NC’s nephew NN, who is an architect. 2. The issues to be determined are: a) Was B Ltd engag...
...unwillingness to participate in the hearing process. 5. The Tribunal’s usual process of contact with a respondent also asks a respondent to provide details of any insurance cover they hold which may affect the claim. The Tribunal notes no information has been provided by SG. This is despite KQ and LT indicating there had been some initial discussion with SG’s insurer, but they say after initial contact there has been no further response or activity. 6. The Issues to be resolved...