13020 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 690 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay LT the sum of $65 on or before 6 December 2024. Reasons 1. LT is the owner of a car, driven by her daughter who parked for 7 minutes beyond the 180 minute parking limit at a private carpark on [Street]. 2. LT’s daughter was parked there while she used the gy...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 178 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS 1. In September 2020, DT purchased a [redacted] umbrella from N Ltd for $199.00. Two years and four months later (when the umbrella was four months out of warranty) the components of the internal rib mechanism failed. DT initially request...
...value of the boundary fence. KZ voluntarily made a contribution to the cost of the fence. Accordingly, the counterclaim must also be dismissed. Referee: L. Mueller Date: 22 April 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 42 APPLICANT MS RESPONDENT UM The Tribunal orders: UM is to pay the sum of $493.22 to MS by no later than 8 March 2024. Reasons: 1. MS and UM are neighbours with a shared driveway. MS’s property is lower than UM’s and is in a dip. 2. MS’s property flooded on three occasions during storms in 2023. MS claims the floodi...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2022] NZEmpC 120 EMPC 413/2019 EMPC 444/2019 IN THE MATTER OF matters removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for costs BETWEEN SMITHS CITY (SOUTHERN) LIMITED (IN RECEIVERSHIP) Plaintiff AND JEREMY WALTER ETTLES CLAXTON First Defendant AND CANDO CREATIVE FLOORING LIMITED Second Defendant AND...
...concluded that with no primary decision having been made by the Corporation as to whether Mr Frankpitt had deemed cover, that was the extent of the Reviewer’s jurisdiction; and there was no unreasonable delay by the Corporation in processing claims by Mr Frankpitt for entitlements. The Court dismissed the appeal against the Reviewer’s decision, for the reasons outlined below. 1 Frankpitt v Accident Compensation Corporation (Deemed [2022] NZACC 98. 2 Background [...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1536 APPLICANT KE Limited RESPONDENT BO Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. BO Limited is to pay the sum of $10,000.00 to KE Limited on or before 2 July 2020. 2. BO Limited is to remove the truck on or before 9 July 2020. If the truck has not been removed by that date, KE Limited may keep or dispose of the tr...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 695 APPLICANT CG APPLICANT NA RESPONDENT YA The Tribunal orders: YA is to pay CG and NA the sum of $2,660 on or before 4 October 2024. Reasons: 1. YA was engaged by CG and NA to provide her services as a ‘maternity matron’ for CG. YA was to look after the new born baby, prepare food for CG as well as provide general
...Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, MNZM Member Ms SP Stewart, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr WC Timmo (in person) Mr J Cox for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CLAIM1 [1] Mr Timmo’s claim is an Information Privacy Principle 6 case (access to personal information). Specifically, Mr Timmo alleges that ICL NZ Ltd interfered with his privacy when it responded to Mr Timmo’s requests for his personal...