12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1522 APPLICANT TJ RESPONDENT HH SECOND RESPONDENT GH The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. HH and GH, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $4,000.00 to TJ on or before Thursday 25 July 2019. 2. Once payment has been made, TJ is to return the necklace to HH within 7 days by hand delivery, courier, o...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 508 APPLICANT CD C/- LC Family Trust APPLICANT LD C/- LC Family Trust APPLICANT QG C/- LC Family Trust RESPONDENT CU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LD, CD and QC are the trustees (the trustees) of the LC Family Trust and own as trustees the property at [address]
1 A Particulars of Claim The following information should be included in the final particulars of claim filed to support the claim. If this information has already been filed with the claim documents and does not need changing or adding to there is no need to provide it again. More often however there has been the addition and / or removal of parties or changes to the amounts being claimed. In addition additional information has become available throughout the a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 91 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal orders: SB is to pay QD $520.00 on or before 18 March 2024. Reasons 1. SB operates an art gallery in [Town] known as the [Gallery]. QD is an artist in the area who on occasion has placed items with the gallery for sale. QD also worked sometimes as a volunteer. QD’s painting [The painting]...
...(‘CCLA’)? • What is payable by XD Ltd, if anything, under the contract? Did XD Ltd accept the goods provided by QH Ltd as per the Sale of Goods provisions in the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (‘CCLA’)? 9. As soon as the contract was formed, the boxes became the property of XD Ltd, irrespective of the arrangement to deliver some or all of the boxes at a later date (as per section 146 of the CCLA). 10. Section 170(1)(b) and (c) of the CCLA provides that:- ...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 742 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT SECOND RESPONDENT SN LL The Tribunal orders: LL and SN must pay M Ltd $2,466.00 by 4pm on 17 January 2024. Reasons: 1. The applicant is a mortgage broker and arranged mortgage financing for the respondents with a third party lender. The respondents moved their mortgage finance to an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 132 APPLICANT XS RESPONDENT UQ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: UQ is to pay $8,100.42 to B Ltd by 7 April 2024. Note: The parties appeared by teleconference for the hearing. UQ was disconnected from the call after being warned about her continuous use of offensive language and her i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 554 APPLICANT GT RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GT purchased her daughter’s school uniform from O Ltd. In December 2023 she purchased a size 12 skirt, and after taking it home realised that it did not fit her daughter. GT returned the skirt to O Ltd, swapped it for a size 14 and purchased...
...[14] Ms Edmunds further submitted that the proposed amendment to the application should be refused. Mr Wano cannot rely on s 30(1)(a) of the Act, it was argued because the exercise of the Courts function under this subsection requires written request advice to the Chief Judge from a court, commission or tribunal (s 30(1)(b)). No such request has been made. Submissions for the Crown [15] Counsel for the Crown submitted that the Court does not have a general supervisory function...
...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...