Search Results

1. DI v NI [2022] NZDT 251 (5 December 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

   ...walls and two containers with door openings. They disagree that it gives them the value and benefit DI proposes it gives. 22. The Tenancy Tribunal pointed out that NI and TF own the property and at best DI had a licence to occupy. This was not formalised in a contract and gave NI and TF the legal right to end the licence to occupy at any time. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 23. I acknowledge DI feels hurt and angry – he made that clear in the hearing. I am confident after

2. TN v HD [2023] NZDT 468 (16 August 2023) [pdf, 141 KB]

   ...Cadastral Survey Act 2002. The Disputes Tribunal has no jurisdiction under that Act. Outcome 23. The claim and counter-claim are dismissed. Referee: Nicholas Blake Date: 16 August 2023 Page 5 of 5 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

3. E Ltd & W Ltd v TN [2024] NZDT 712 (30 August 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...foreseeable expenses and so are recoverable. 13. I am satisfied that the amount claimed by W Ltd is the correct amount to be paid by TN, which is $18,119.50. Referee: M Wilson Date: 30 August 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

4. DB v K Ltd [2024] NZDT 325 (16 April 2024) [pdf, 98 KB]

   ...outside of jurisdiction or unnecessarily prolonged proceedings. As none of these exceptions apply in this case the applicant’s claim for costs is dismissed. Referee: Hannan DTR Date: 16 April 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

5. TQ & MQ v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 460 (19 June 2024) [pdf, 133 KB]

   ...infrastructure and to service growth in the long term. 8. TA, General Manager of H Ltd, stated a Development Contribution is not charged to all new builds, and that they were unaware it would be charged when this contract was entered into. However information provided by the Council and on their website states they can provide an estimate of the Development Contribution at the planning stage, and that the contribution is assessed when the Building Consent is granted. I therefore find t...

6. TU v EN & C Ltd [2024] NZDT 479 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...provided, and in any event, such work would be the contractual responsibility of NI Ltd, and not EN personally. This part of the claim therefore does not succeed. Referee Perfect Date: 28 May 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...

7. Baxter v Robinson - Rangiwaea 4F14B1A Reservation (2025) 519 Aotea MB 25 (519 AOT 25).pdf [pdf, 240 KB]

   ...after hearing from all parties in person on 1 September 2025, I find that there is no basis to enforce any obligations of the trustees that would give rise to a remedy. I now give my reasons for this outcome. Ngā Tāpaetanga a Helena Helena’s Claims [3] I summarise the allegations raised by Helena. Breaches of Trustee Obligations [4] Helena claims that the trustees failed to act in good faith and uphold responsibilities under the Act, including poor communication and lack of...

8. LCRO 130/2017 HS v NC and EH (18 September 2019) [pdf, 260 KB]

   ...September 2015. [5] Mr HS met with the practitioners the following day. They provided to him that day by email a letter of engagement accompanied by information on the principal aspects of client care and service, and terms of engagement. They requested “$1,000 plus GST” in advance of their fees which he paid.1 [6] Mr HS met with the practitioners again a week later, on 24 September 2015. At that meeting he raised with the practitioners his dispute with [hardware store], ab...

9. Stryder v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2024] NZACC 125 (24 July 2024) [pdf, 220 KB]

   ...from the initial medical assessment and the functional capacity evaluation was that Mr Stryder was fit for his pre-injury employment as a chef. Weekly compensation ceased on 18 October 2010. [7] On 21 May 2019, Mr Stryder’s GP completed forms for assessing entitlement to a lump sum payment. The GP noted that Mr Stryder was suffering from PTSD and anxiety. Since these conditions were not covered injuries, he could not be assessed for a lump sum payment. However, the Corporat...

10. [2014] NZEmpC 212 Cudby & Meade Ltd v New Zealand Furniture, Manufacturing and Associated Workers’ Union Inc [pdf, 99 KB]

    ...[9] It is not without significance in terms of what has transpired subsequently in this Court that in its determination the Authority also saw fit to make the following observations: [4] During the Authority's investigation meeting I requested Mr Memelink to make arrangements to file the wage time and holiday 6 At [21]. 7 At [16]. 8 At [17]. 9 At [20]. records for Mr Stevens. He has explained this wou...