12922 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 282 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: DN is to pay X Ltd $1,955.00 on or before 21 August 2023. Reasons 1. DN rented a caravan from X Ltd (X) on or about 19 May 2016. When he took the caravan, he said he would start paying for the rental of the caravan, but he did not. When he returned it, it wa...
...to appeal the security for costs order referred to in [3] above. The leave application was accompanied by an application for a stay of the order in question pending the hearing of the appeal by the Court of Appeal. In an accompanying letter a request was made for the application for leave to be heard urgently. [6] At the directions conference this morning, counsel were able to confirm that the Court of Appeal has scheduled a hearing for the leave application on Monday, 8 April 20...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 7 APPLICANT NB RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. NB had a contract of insurance with B Ltd which was issued in December 2018. He made a claim in October 2022 for an injury (over 2 years before) he says he incurred to his back when he was pushing a car in June 2020. B Ltd declined his claim saying he...
...understanding of both parties that it was non-refundable. 14. I find the deposit is refundable because it has not been proved it was non-refundable. In addition, it is not usual for a deposit to be sought or paid until an unconditional contract has been formed. An enforceable contract was not formed because any agreements there might have been were not committed to paper in a Sale and Purchase Agreement as is required by law. 15. I find that Mr TT is entitled to retain $1,265.0...
...April 2018 DATE OF LAST SUBMISSIONS: 25 May 2018 (plaintiff) 1 June 2018 (defendant) 7 June 2018 (plaintiff) DATE OF DECISION: 14 June 2018 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL1 INTRODUCTION [1] On 10 August 2015 Dr Naidu addressed a request to the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) for access to the personal information which RACS then held about 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Naidu v Royal Australasian College...
...HALSE v EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY [2023] NZEmpC 38 [15 March 2023] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2023] NZEmpC 38 EMPC 394/2021 IN THE MATTER OF an application for judicial review AND IN THE MATTER OF an application for a stay BETWEEN ALLAN HALSE Applicant AND EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS AUTHORITY First Respondent AND RANGIURA TRUST BOARD Second Re...
...APPEARANCES/COUNSEL Peter Nee Harland for appellant Paul McBride for respondent DECISION: APPLICATION TO REINSTATE APPEAL [1] The application is to reinstate the appeal filed under ACA No. 02/05 (the appeal) that Mr Nee Harland withdrew on the applicant's behalf on 14 March 2007. [2] The appeal was against a review decision dated 20 February 2003 (the review U"(J1:;lllJl~,,-::::;:::-~ which in turn was against the Corporation's decision made on 1 0 March 2003 (the d...
...unique features which, in combination, make the proposed award of $45,000 truly exceptional. The decision sets no precedent. [9] Each of the unique features will now be addressed in turn. DISCUSSION [10] This was a case in which Dr Turner made a request under IPP 6 for access to information held by the University about her. The University complied with the request. However, Dr Turner and her then counsel formed the misconceived view the University had concealed information. Dr Tu...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 120 APPLICANT BQ RESPONDENT BC The Tribunal orders: BC is to pay the sum of $10,470.00 to BQ by no later than 29 March 2024. Reasons: 1. BQ and BC met on a dating site in February 2023. Both described their relationship as being friends. BQ claims BC had financial issues and that he asked her for money to assist him with rent,...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1320 APPLICANT OH Limited RESPONDENT NI Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. OH Limited (OH) supplies and maintains [redacted] automatic door systems to commercial premises, including a number of [redacted] supermarkets. The contracts involve installation of the doors and the payment...