13103 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1362 APPLICANT KW RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. Mr W purchased a property from Mr D (and partner) in 2015. Mr W's neighbours had the boundary surveyed at some point after he purchased, and established that the fence, which all concerned had understood to be on th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 312 APPLICANT ED Ltd RESPONDENT TQ Ltd The Tribunal orders: TQ Ltd is to pay $274.49 to ED Ltd on or before 24 August 2023. Reasons 1. ED Ltd engaged TQ Ltd to supply metal windows and matching double doors. TQ Ltd emailed ED Ltd a written quotation dated 14 April 2021 for $27,077.72 incl. GST and ED Ltd accepted the q...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 628 APPLICANT UB RESPONDENT NC The Tribunal orders: NC is to pay to UB $2,697.50 on or before 5:00pm on Friday 22 December 2023. Reasons 1. UB lives next door to a property owned by NC and tenanted by NC’s daughter DE. On NC’s property there are many trees and plants. UB stated that the trees are overgrown and for many mo...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 444 APPLICANT SL RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In February 2022, SL started [treatment 1] and then [treatment 2] treatment by T Ltd for fat reduction around her abdomen. She was unhappy with the results and found [treatment 2] painful. 2. SL now seeks a refund of the $4...
...decision - s 6(1), claims process – ss 134-161, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 13 April 2023. The Reviewer dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, an application for review of the Corporation’s email dated 21 November 2022, on the basis that this was not a reviewable decision. 2 Background [2] On 25 December 2020, Ms Morris was walking down a steep hill. She slipped and fell...
STEVENSON V BENTAN TWISTED LTD WN WC 12/09 7 May 2009 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 12/09 WRC 10/09 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN SHAUN STEVENSON Applicant AND BENTAN TWISTED LIMITED Respondent Hearing: (Heard on the papers) 5 May 2009 Judgment: 7 May 2009 JUDGMENT OF JUDGE C M SHAW [1] This is an unopposed application for leave to file a statement of claim out of time. [2] The a...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 062 IN THE MATTER OF an application for enforcement order under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2023-AKL-159) Applicant AND CHINA FORESTRY GROUP NEW ZEALAND COMPANY LIMITED First Respondent AND YUXIA SUN Second Respondent AND WOOD MARKETING SERVICES LIMITED Third Respondent AND IN THE MATTER OF an applicatio...
...carpark. 3. KM has applied for a declaration of non-liability (which is only available for claims in contract). He clarified at the first hearing that he is willing to pay the $95.00 fee, but not the subsequent collection costs and interest claimed by Q Ltd. 4. Q Ltd filed a counterclaim against TB. The amount claimed in the application is $1,000.00, although NS (on behalf of Q Ltd) clarified that the claim is for $426.51 plus ongoing interest. Background 5. After KM receive...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 102 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT MH The Tribunal orders: Claim dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. BN and MH own rural properties on [Road]. The properties are divided by a river, and a strip of reserve land on either side of the river. BN farms his property. MH’s property is in forest. 2. BN purchased his prope...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1424 APPLICANT SR APPLICANT TR RESPONDENT SP SECOND RESPONDENT JX Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. SP is struck out as a party to the claim. 2. JX Ltd is to pay SR and TR, as trustees of the RX, $8505.00 on or before 12 August 2020. 3. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to [reda...