Search Results

Search results for claim form.

13020 items matching your search terms

  1. KM v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 324 (12 January 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

    ...carpark. 3. KM has applied for a declaration of non-liability (which is only available for claims in contract). He clarified at the first hearing that he is willing to pay the $95.00 fee, but not the subsequent collection costs and interest claimed by Q Ltd. 4. Q Ltd filed a counterclaim against TB. The amount claimed in the application is $1,000.00, although NS (on behalf of Q Ltd) clarified that the claim is for $426.51 plus ongoing interest. Background 5. After KM receive...

  2. UN & JI v NB Ltd [2022] NZDT 32 (23 March 2022) [pdf, 164 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 32 APPLICANTS UN and JI RESPONDENT N & B Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT TD C/- TM THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT LN The Tribunal orders: The claims against the three respondents are all dismissed. Reasons [1] The applicants, JI and UN, claim that the respondents failed in their respective dut...

  3. EI v AI JBH Ltd [2020] NZDT 1542 (15 January 2020) [pdf, 169 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1542 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT BI APPLICANT'S INSURER JBH Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 30 July 2019, while cycling past [location], BI hit a parked car owned by EI, causing damage to the right side of the car. 2. EI and his insurer JBH Limited...

  4. TC v DG [2023] NZDT 25 (17 March 2023) [pdf, 166 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 25 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late December 2022, DG posted on Facebook Marketplace that she had some decorations to sell from her wedding. One of these was a round archway advertised as containing approximately $600.00 worth of various faux flowers. The...

  5. KH v EI [2024] NZDT 380 (12 June 2024) [pdf, 143 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 380 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT EI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by KH and J Ltd against EI is proved. EI is to pay J Ltd the sum of $12,198.48 on or by 30 June 2024. Reasons 1. Four vehicles were traveling south on State Highway One approaching or crossing a b...

  6. XQ v T Ltd [2022] NZDT 85 (8 February 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 85 APPLICANT XQ RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay XQ $107.61 on or before 25 February 2022. Reasons 1. On about 4 October 2021, XQ bought an automotive [item] from T Ltd through Trademe. He asked a mechanic to install the [item]. When installed, the mechanic found the vehicle did not run correctly....

  7. AJ v IO Ltd & TF Ltd [2021] NZDT 1692 (10 December 2021) [pdf, 126 KB]

    ...of the guarantee of acceptable quality in the Consumer Guarantees Act? b. If yes, is IO Ltd liable for damages, and if so how much, for the following: i. Refund or replacement ii. Consequential financial losses iii. Consequential losses in the form of emotional harm. c. If yes, is TF Ltd liable for damages, and if so how much, for the following: CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 i. Refund or replacement ii. Consequential financial losses iii. Consequential losses in the form of...

  8. [2024] NZEnvC 062 Gisborne District Council v China Foresty Group New Zealand Company Limited [pdf, 267 KB]

    IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 062 IN THE MATTER OF an application for enforcement order under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2023-AKL-159) Applicant AND CHINA FORESTRY GROUP NEW ZEALAND COMPANY LIMITED First Respondent AND YUXIA SUN Second Respondent AND WOOD MARKETING SERVICES LIMITED Third Respondent AND IN THE MATTER OF an applicatio...

  9. TN v KM [2024] NZDT 106 (28 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 106 APPLICANT TN RESPONDENT KM The Tribunal orders: KM is to pay TN $1,552.96 within 28 days. KM did not appear at the hearing. Reasons [1] TN claims from KM the cost of replacing carpet in a room that KM had occupied in his, TN’s, house. TN also claims the cost of professional carpet cleaning and materials. [2] TN said that...

  10. K Ltd v EN [2023] NZDT 690 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 171 KB]

    ...APPLICANT K Ltd RESPONDENT EN The Tribunal orders: EN is to pay K Ltd the amount of $2,055.00 on or before 29 January 2024. Reason 1. The respondent suffered damage to their dwelling which was the subject of an insurance claim. The insurer obtained a quote from the applicant, and agreed to cash settle the respondents claim for the amount of the applicants quote less the excess. The applicant carried out the work and issued an invoice as per the quote, though l...