12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 388 APPLICANT DL RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 2. DL is seeking a refund of the hose reel she bought from D Ltd. The instructions that came with the reel were not clear and it broke in the process of being assembled and disassembled. D Ltd is disputing liabilit...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 499 APPLICANT DE RESPONDENT SC APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Background 1. SC and DE were involved in an accident at the intersection of [Street 1] and [Street 2] on 26 November 2022. 2. The accident took place at night, in rainy condition...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 313 APPLICANT EU RESPONDENT UX The Tribunal orders: UX is to pay the sum of $4,990.00 to EU on or before Friday 13 July 2023. Reasons: 1. In December 2022, UX (the supplier) provided a written quotation to EU (the consumer) to supply and install a 5m electronic driveway gate for $10,887.00. The consumer paid...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 503 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1) In February 2023, the applicant bought a [vehicle] from the respondent. At the time of purchase the car had an odometer reading of 52,547 kilometres. 2) On or about 25 March 2024 the car broke down. The car was repaired, and the water pump nee...
...filing fee for the claim in the Disputes Tribunal. 3. The issues to be decided were as follows: a. Have PB and UQ breached the terms of a legally binding contract, and if so, which terms were breached? b. If the terms were breached, have the Applicants mitigated their loss? CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 c. If the terms were breached, what are the Respondents required to pay by way of compensation/damages? d. Can OS claim the cost of the [training course? e. Can the Ap...
...against him and victimised him in breach of the Human Rights Act 1993 (HRA) as they threatened to trespass him from the store and tried to provoke him into an altercation so he could be trespassed. [2] In response to Mr Brown’s claim, PEL filed an application to strike-out the claim. The basis of the PEL’s strike-out application is that the claim discloses no reasonable 1 [This decision is to be cited as Brown v Progressive Enterprises Ltd (Strike-Out) [2024] NZHRRT 10.] 2 P...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 704 APPLICANT MA RESPONDENT X Ltd The Tribunal orders: MA’s claim against X Ltd is dismissed. Reasons: 1. MA booked to stay at X Ltd’s hostel for four nights in July 2023. Later in the evening on the second night, X Ltd’s staff asked MA to leave the hostel as they claimed she had breached the hostel rules. She left the hostel t...
...prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available or a mistake was made. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are outside of time, you must also fill out an Application for Rehearing Out of Time. PLEASE NOTE:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 16 APPLICANT FH RESPONDENT UO Ltd The Tribunal orders: UO Ltd is to pay FH $570.00 on or before 16 March 2023. Reasons 1. In 2021, FH bought tickets for a Guns n Roses concert from UO Ltd for $570.00. The concert was originally to be held in November 2021 but was postponed because of the Covid pandemic. The new date wa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 123 APPLICANT LB RESPONDENT VB Ltd The Tribunal orders: VB Ltd is to pay the sum of $17,000.00 to LB by no later than 23 September 2022. Reasons: 1. LB claims he purchased a car from VB Ltd for $69,000 on 5 May 2021. The vehicle was purchased with finance of $39,000 from NUG. The balance of the purchase price...