Ministry of Justice

Search Results

1. Steele v MSC 2018 Ltd (Removal of Stay and Extension of Time) [2020] NZHRRT 6 [pdf, 467 KB]

   ...decision is to be cited as Steele v MSC 2018 Ltd (Removal of Stay and Extension of Time) [2020] NZHRRT 6] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020] NZHRRT 6 2 Commission (Mr Steele had stated that the Commission “has been notified and a request made for mediation” and that the Tribunal order “mediation to occur by teleconference”). [2] On 16 May 2019 Mr Steele applied to have the stay lifted on grounds that the defendant had (allegedly) ignored “many” requests to m...

2. Moala v Tangilanu [2014] NZIACDT 56 (29 April 2014) [pdf, 108 KB]

   ...DECISION REPRESENTATION: Registrar: In person Complainant: In person Adviser: In person Date Issued: 29 April 2014 2 DECISION Preliminary [1] The complainant engaged the adviser to assist with a request for a visa; she was in New Zealand without a current visa and therefore illegally. The adviser submitted the request and Immigration New Zealand declined the request. [2] The complaint is that the adviser took some four months to lodge t...

3. BN v MH [2024] NZDT 102 (8 February 2024) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 102 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT MH The Tribunal orders: Claim dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. BN and MH own rural properties on [Road]. The properties are divided by a river, and a strip of reserve land on either side of the river. BN farms his property. MH’s property is in forest. 2. BN purchased his prope...

4. SR v SP [2020] NZDT 1424 (28 July 2020) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1424 APPLICANT SR APPLICANT TR RESPONDENT SP SECOND RESPONDENT JX Ltd The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. SP is struck out as a party to the claim. 2. JX Ltd is to pay SR and TR, as trustees of the RX, $8505.00 on or before 12 August 2020. 3. Payment is to be made by way of direct credit to [reda...

5. BB v U Ltd [2024] NZDT 183 (27 March 2024) [pdf, 91 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 183 APPLICANT BB RESPONDENT U Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BB owns a property at [Address 1]. U Ltd owns the adjoining property at [Address 2]. 2. In January 2023, a storm damaged the fence on the boundary of [Address 1] and [Address 2]. BB claims the damage posed an imminent threat to his home and...

6. WS v KF [2023] NZDT 37 (13 February 2023).pdf [pdf, 193 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 37 APPLICANT WS RESPONDENT KF The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. In November 2022, WS purchased a car from KF on [the Internet]. When WS took delivery of the car, he discovered there were dents and scratches on it and a taillight that needed to be replaced. He fixed some of these items and the...

7. QG v EK [2024] NZDT 737 (13 September 2024) [pdf, 177 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 737 APPLICANT QG RESPONDENT EK The Tribunal orders: EK is to pay QG $13,933.67 on or before Friday, 4 October 2024. Reasons: 1. QG claims that on 13 February 2024, she accepted a quote to redo her bathroom from EK who represented himself as a builder operating in the name of N Ltd. The agreed price was $38,180.00, excludi...

8. BD v U Ltd [2022] NZDT 232 (10 November 2022) [pdf, 179 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

9. KM v Q Ltd [2023] NZDT 324 (12 January 2023) [pdf, 194 KB]

   ...carpark. 3. KM has applied for a declaration of non-liability (which is only available for claims in contract). He clarified at the first hearing that he is willing to pay the $95.00 fee, but not the subsequent collection costs and interest claimed by Q Ltd. 4. Q Ltd filed a counterclaim against TB. The amount claimed in the application is $1,000.00, although NS (on behalf of Q Ltd) clarified that the claim is for $426.51 plus ongoing interest. Background 5. After KM receive...

10. Morris v Accident Compensation Corporation (Interpretation of decision) [2024] NZACC 089 [pdf, 186 KB]

    ...decision - s 6(1), claims process – ss 134-161, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 13 April 2023. The Reviewer dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, an application for review of the Corporation’s email dated 21 November 2022, on the basis that this was not a reviewable decision. 2 Background [2] On 25 December 2020, Ms Morris was walking down a steep hill. She slipped and fell...