12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court: Case number: [2022] NZDT 281 APPLICANT MN RESPONDENT N Limited APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) Insurer The Tribunal orders: 1. N Limited is to pay Insurer $3,653.53 within 30 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 2. On 8 June 2021 MN took her car to the N Ltd carwash. Soon after she entered the car wash, s...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 509 APPLICANT KG RESPONDENT P Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT DX The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim against P Ltd is withdrawn. 2. DX is to pay KG the sum of $3000.00 on or before Monday 16 October 2023. Reasons: 1. KG claims that on 18 June 2023, he purchased an electric scooter for $3000.00 from DX that she...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 222 APPLICANT ET APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT CP Ltd The Tribunal orders: CP Ltd is to pay ET and DT the sum of $8,887.00 within 28 days of the date of this order. Reasons: 1. On 2 August 2022, ET and DT purchased a kitset cabin from CP Ltd for $8,399.00. The price included the cost of freight from [City 1...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 272 APPLICANT CU RESPONDENT EM SECOND RESPONDENT DQ THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT ED THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT H Ltd THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT KX The Tribunal orders: The claim is struck out. Reasons 1. CU is a farmer based in [town]. 2. In 2018, CU was intereste...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 406 APPLICANT MM RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by MM against B Ltd is dismissed. Reasons 1. This dispute arises from a repair of an alarm system at a property owned by MM by B Ltd in September 2023. This repair cost of $483 was paid by MM (or his agent) at that time. In the present claim MM now seeks a refund of t...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1585 APPLICANT EZ RESPONDENT LH The Tribunal orders: 1. EZ’s claim against LH is dismissed. 2. LH’s claim against EZ is dismissed. Reasons: 1. EZ and LH were neighbours in adjacent properties in [Address 1] (owned by EZ) and [Address 2] (previously owned by LH). EZ lives on the high side of the two prope...
...Judgeꞌs MB 188 IN THE MĀORI LAND COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AOTEA DISTRICT A20090017831 CJ 2009/48 UNDER Section 45, Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 IN THE MATTER OF Te Rangi Kaiamokura BETWEEN TUTEA SMALLMAN Applicant Judgment: 19 March 2015 DECISION OF DEPUTY CHIEF JUDGE C L FOX 2015 Chief Judgeꞌs MB 189 Introduction [1] This application filed by Tuatea Smallman (the applicant)...
...Haines ONZM QC, Chairperson REPRESENTATION: Mr RW Kee, Director of Human Rights Proceedings, for plaintiff Mr Van Wijk in person Mr JLS Shaw for second and third defendants DATE OF ACCESS HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL FILE: 5 March 2019 DECISION OF CHAIRPERSON GRANTING ACCESS TO TRIBUNAL FILE SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS1 1 [This decision is to be cited as A v Van Wijk (Access...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1402 APPLICANT NU RESPONDENT TE The Tribunal orders: NU’s claim against TE is dismissed. Reasons 1. On 22 April 2020 NU purchased an Audi S4 vehicle from TE. Prior to purchase TE told NU that the vehicle was in good condition apart from that the keyless entry was not working. TE advised NU that he could purcha...
Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 206 APPLICANT HX RESPONDENT NM The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. HX and NM are neighbours with a shared driveway (the driveway belongs to HX but there is an easement over it giving NM’s property use of the driveway). NM’s property was created as a result of a subdivision undertaken by HX. 2. NM purchase...