Search Results

1. [2023] NZREADT 23 - ZI v CAC 2107 (17 August 2023).pdf [pdf, 178 KB]

   ...under the Housing Improvement Regulations 1947. [5] On 12 May 2023, the Committee issued its decision on the penalty orders. It reprimanded both the licensees and ordered the second respondent to pay a fine of $2,000. As for the appellant’s claim for compensation of more than $240,000, the Committee found it had no power to award compensation and it declined to refer the issue of compensation to the Tribunal as the unsatisfactory conduct was at the lower end of the scale and r...

2. KM & MM v WN & DN [2024] NZDT 577 (5 July 2024) [pdf, 188 KB]

   ...situations where there is property damage, loss or injury. Property injury does not include damage to personal health, nor visual pollution. Nor is it pure economic loss in the absence of any actual property damage/loss. 8. In this case, the Applicants do not allege any physical property loss or damage. Instead their claim solely concerns the impact on their personal health, the visual impact and a ‘potential’ economic loss which might arise. Consequently I find that the Tribunal...

3. ES v LQ & TQ [2023] NZDT 79 (16 March 2023) [pdf, 213 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 79 APPLICANT (And Cross- Respondent) ES RESPONDENT LQ SECOND RESPONDENT (And Cross- Applicant) TQ The Tribunal orders: 1. LQ and TQ are to pay $342.00 to ES on or before 6 April 2023. 2. The claim by TQ against ES is dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claims 1. In October 2021, ES purchased a tiny...

4. H Ltd v T Ltd & Ors [2023] NZDT 700 (19 December 2023) [pdf, 226 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 700 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT T Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT NX THIRD OR SUBSEQUENT RESPONDENT B Ltd RESPONDENT INSURER (for T Ltd) XX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. H Ltd were contracted by NX to build a house. NX contracted separately with B Ltd for the house plans. H Ltd contracted...

5. WHT - Guidelines for self represented claimants on documents required for hearing [pdf, 78 KB]

   1 A Particulars of Claim The following information should be included in the final particulars of claim filed to support the claim. If this information has already been filed with the claim documents and does not need changing or adding to there is no need to provide it again. More often however there has been the addition and / or removal of parties or changes to the amounts being claimed. In addition additional information has become available throughout the a...

6. Bradbury v Police (Mootness) [2020] NZHRRT 1 [pdf, 161 KB]

   ...application by the Police for an order that the Tribunal utilise a “closed” process in relation to certain evidence and submissions intended to be presented by the Police at the substantive hearing. The decision of the Tribunal was reserved. At the request of the Tribunal the 1 [This decision is to be cited as: Bradbury v Police (Mootness) [2020] NZHRRT 1] 2 parties subsequently filed supplementary submissions fol...

7. [2015] NZEmpC 106 Nisha v LSG Sky Chefs New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 94 KB]

   ...IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 106 ARC 22/14 IN THE MATTER OF a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for leave to file interlocutory applications BETWEEN SHABEENA SHAREEN NISHA (NISHA ALIM) Plaintiff AND LSG SKY CHEFS NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: By written submissions filed on 25 and 30 June 2015 Appearances: MW O'B...

8. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...

9. Sharko & Ors as Trustees of the Moata Trust [pdf, 99 KB]

   ...Section 49 of the Act provides that a claimant may apply to the Chair seeking a review of a decision that their claim does not comply with the eligibility criteria within 20 working days of receiving notice of the decision. On receiving such an application I must decide whether or not the claim meets the eligibility criteria. [4] I have considered the following documents in conducting my review: The application for reconsideration dated 31 March 2010. The letter dated 4...

10. Filing a financial statement of judgement debtor organisation [pdf, 345 KB]

    ...$84. If the financial statement is filed by the judgment creditor, the court can order the judgment debtor to repay the fee. Filing a financial statement of judgment debtor KEY WORDS Below are explanations of some of the words we use in this application form. Court order Issued by a court or tribunal that requires a person or organisation to do, or stop doing, something. Enforcement Action authorised by a court to get the judgment debtor to comply with a judgment or court o...