12515 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 132 APPLICANT XS RESPONDENT UQ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) B Ltd The Tribunal orders: UQ is to pay $8,100.42 to B Ltd by 7 April 2024. Note: The parties appeared by teleconference for the hearing. UQ was disconnected from the call after being warned about her continuous use of offensive language and her i...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 554 APPLICANT GT RESPONDENT O Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. GT purchased her daughter’s school uniform from O Ltd. In December 2023 she purchased a size 12 skirt, and after taking it home realised that it did not fit her daughter. GT returned the skirt to O Ltd, swapped it for a size 14 and purchased...
...Zealand wrote to Mr Hu explaining his client did not have a current police clearance. [1.2] Shortly after that Mr Hu assisted her to apply for a work visa, it was necessary for her to do so before her visa expired. [1.3] As Mr Hu filed the visa application without a police clearance, Immigration New Zealand rejected the attempt to lodge the application, and the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully. [1.4] Mr Hu took time to remedy the absence of a police clearance, and request a v...
Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau rna waru Pipiri 1994 Waitangi Tribunal Division Department of Justice Newsletter ISSN 0114-717X Number 28 June 1994 CLAIMS IN HEARING Chathams W AI 64 The Moriori inquiry was opened in the Chatham Islands 9-13 May, and continued the following week, 16-20 May, in Wellington. The claim concerns the failure of the Crown to recognise and protect Moriori customary rights to land and fisheries on Chatham and outlying islands...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 91 APPLICANT SB RESPONDENT QD The Tribunal orders: SB is to pay QD $520.00 on or before 18 March 2024. Reasons 1. SB operates an art gallery in [Town] known as the [Gallery]. QD is an artist in the area who on occasion has placed items with the gallery for sale. QD also worked sometimes as a volunteer. QD’s painting [The painting]...
...[14] Ms Edmunds further submitted that the proposed amendment to the application should be refused. Mr Wano cannot rely on s 30(1)(a) of the Act, it was argued because the exercise of the Courts function under this subsection requires written request advice to the Chief Judge from a court, commission or tribunal (s 30(1)(b)). No such request has been made. Submissions for the Crown [15] Counsel for the Crown submitted that the Court does not have a general supervisory function...
...if a guilty plea is entered at or before the hearing Reporting to and invoicing Legal Aid Criminal Simplification Project Steps – August 2012 Page 8 Granting Notes Documentation Requirements Application for Criminal Legal Aid (LA form 1) [s14 Legal Services Act 2011] Criminal Legal Aid Amendment to Grant (LA form 2) [s28 Legal Services Act 2011] – if the time required for the step is expected to exceed the guideline hours stated Criminal Legal Aid Guilty Plea Tax I...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 553 APPLICANT UC Limited RESPONDENT BD Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. UC Ltd was represented at the hearing by SX and BD Limited was represented by HT. 2. UC Ltd laid concrete supplied by BD Limited on a driveway of a property which was a development done by UC Ltd. UC Ltd says there w...
...S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay KM & OM $50.00 on or before Wednesday, 18 October 2023. Summary of Reasons: [1] The hearing was convened by teleconference. Both parties appeared at the hearing. Background [2] The applicants seek a partial refund following their booking of holiday accommodation [Town] in June 2023. The applicants seek a refund of $588.00 claiming the booked rental was misrepresented to them. In particular the applicants claim that when they...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 502 APPLICANT NG and UG RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: B Ltd is to pay the sum of $1,676.59 to NG and UG on or before 14 September 2023. Reasons: 1. On 30 December 2020, NG and UG entered into an agreement for B Ltd to manage their rental property. The agreement provided for termination by either party on thr