12515 items matching your search terms
...COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA ŌTAUTAHI [2020] NZEmpC 45 EMPC 322/2019 IN THE MATTER OF proceedings removed from the Employment Relations Authority AND IN THE MATTER of an application for stay of proceedings BETWEEN JOHN WILLIAMS Plaintiff AND RURAL LIVESTOCK LIMITED Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: C Murphy, counsel for plaintiff H McIntosh, counsel fo...
...Deputy Chairperson Dr SJ Hickey, MNZM Member Ms SP Stewart, Member REPRESENTATION: Mr WC Timmo (in person) Mr J Cox for defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 17 August 2023 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL STRIKING OUT THE CLAIM1 [1] Mr Timmo’s claim is an Information Privacy Principle 6 case (access to personal information). Specifically, Mr Timmo alleges that ICL NZ Ltd interfered with his privacy when it responded to Mr Timmo’s requests for his personal...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 282 APPLICANT X Ltd RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: DN is to pay X Ltd $1,955.00 on or before 21 August 2023. Reasons 1. DN rented a caravan from X Ltd (X) on or about 19 May 2016. When he took the caravan, he said he would start paying for the rental of the caravan, but he did not. When he returned it, it wa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1320 APPLICANT OH Limited RESPONDENT NI Limited The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. OH Limited (OH) supplies and maintains [redacted] automatic door systems to commercial premises, including a number of [redacted] supermarkets. The contracts involve installation of the doors and the payment...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 120 APPLICANT BQ RESPONDENT BC The Tribunal orders: BC is to pay the sum of $10,470.00 to BQ by no later than 29 March 2024. Reasons: 1. BQ and BC met on a dating site in February 2023. Both described their relationship as being friends. BQ claims BC had financial issues and that he asked her for money to assist him with rent,...
...unique features which, in combination, make the proposed award of $45,000 truly exceptional. The decision sets no precedent. [9] Each of the unique features will now be addressed in turn. DISCUSSION [10] This was a case in which Dr Turner made a request under IPP 6 for access to information held by the University about her. The University complied with the request. However, Dr Turner and her then counsel formed the misconceived view the University had concealed information. Dr Tu...
...(‘CCLA’)? • What is payable by XD Ltd, if anything, under the contract? Did XD Ltd accept the goods provided by QH Ltd as per the Sale of Goods provisions in the Contract and Commercial Law Act 2017 (‘CCLA’)? 9. As soon as the contract was formed, the boxes became the property of XD Ltd, irrespective of the arrangement to deliver some or all of the boxes at a later date (as per section 146 of the CCLA). 10. Section 170(1)(b) and (c) of the CCLA provides that:- ...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 508 APPLICANT CD C/- LC Family Trust APPLICANT LD C/- LC Family Trust APPLICANT QG C/- LC Family Trust RESPONDENT CU Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. LD, CD and QC are the trustees (the trustees) of the LC Family Trust and own as trustees the property at [address]
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 538 APPLICANT FX RESPONDENT KQ The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 1. KQ was engaged on contract to FX for a period of around 1.5 years. KQ’s contract was terminated in May 2023. 2. In July 2023, FX contacted KQ seeking a refund for discounted treatments KQ had given to family and others at a...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1522 APPLICANT TJ RESPONDENT HH SECOND RESPONDENT GH The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. HH and GH, jointly and severally, are to pay the sum of $4,000.00 to TJ on or before Thursday 25 July 2019. 2. Once payment has been made, TJ is to return the necklace to HH within 7 days by hand delivery, courier, o...