12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 74 APPLICANT N Ltd RESPONDENT ES The Tribunal orders: ES is to pay N Ltd $24,788.97 by 9 February 2024. Background 1. ES and NB (N Ltd) are neighbours. 2. On 8 August 2023, ES cut and removed 21 mature (20-25m) poplar trees located on N Ltd’s property, near the boundary. ES used a ‘tree shear’ attachment on his digger....
Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 653 APPLICANT TS RESPONDENT LN SECOND RESPONDENT DN The Tribunal orders: Both the claim and the counterclaim are dismissed. Reasons: 1. This is a claim from TS seeking monetary contributions from LN and DN for fence remediation work conducted by him. He claims remediation was required as stormwater discharge from LN and DN’s prope...
Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau rna wha Maehe 1992 Orakei Settlement - At Last One of the most contentious land claims headed towards its final resolution with the passing of the Orakei Act 1991 late last year. The Act is very different from the 1978 legislation it replaces, reflecting the new environment for the settlement of Maori claims. The former legislation referred cautiously to an 'agreement' reached between the Crown and Maori, with regar...
...APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: W Ltd is to pay BI, BD, CD, EB, HW, HI, HN, NT, SS, TI, and UD, the sum of $4,994.33 on or before 23 March 2024. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Reasons: 1. The applicants planned a golfing trip [overseas], and booked return flights with W Ltd. Their booking was made with W Ltd’s Group Sales Team in July 2019, and the flights were to be in April and May 2020. However, due to the impact of the pa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 698 APPLICANT HK RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HK purchased a F Ltd washer/drier in October 2019 from [retailer]. The machine was delivered to, and installed at, a rental property in [Town]. 2. In May 2024, a fault developed. A F Ltd repairer found a wire was broken on the motor plu...
...District Court [2023] NZDT 519 APPLICANT BQ APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to pay BQ and LI the total sum of $5953.39 on or before Friday 3 November 2023. Reasons: 1. In October 2020, the Applicants purchased a 2 storey, 2 bedroom duplex from the first owner who bought it new from J Ltd (the company) in 2017. The Applicants claim that the roofing has failed within 5 years of being built and that it is not fit for purpose, and tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1698 APPLICANT TO RESPONDENT OM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TO said that on 28 November 2020 he attempted to purchase a $2,986.00 camera from OM in [City 1]. He used his eftpos card, but the transaction was declined. He tried a second time, but it was again declined. He was...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 228 APPLICANT ED RESPONDENT CC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CC emailed ED regarding the purchase of quail eggs and quails. 2. ED replied sending some information and proposing some dates to send a breeding group of quails, eggs and feed. 3. CC responded saying that she would love to pro...
...issue [99] The propensity evidence tendered by Mr Taylor [106] The allegation of bad faith [108] Summary of case for Corrections [114] Key findings [117] THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS [120] Interference with privacy - definition [120] Decisions on requests [121] APPLICATION OF THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS TO THE FACTS [126] The concessions made by Corrections in relation to liability [130] THE QUESTION OF REMEDY [135] The question of a training order [138] The conduct of the defendant...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1664 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT OQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2020 QL rented a chair in the [X] business operated by OQ. Their arrangement came to an end in January 2021, when QL says the arrangement was abruptly terminated by OQ. 2. QL’s claim is for $3,474.50. He init...