Search Results

1. T Ltd v H Ltd [2024] NZDT 735 (15 October 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 735 APPLICANT T Ltd RESPONDENT H Ltd The Tribunal orders: H Ltd is to pay T Ltd $19,875.67 on or before Friday 15 November 2024. Reasons: 1. T Ltd and H Ltd had a working arrangement where H Ltd would subcontract T Ltd to carry out work on its behalf. T Ltd did so as instructed from July 2020 to December 2022. In December 2022 T Ltd i...

2. Te Manutukutuku Issue 14 [pdf, 2.6 MB]

   Te Roopu Whakamana i te Tiriti 0 Waitangi Panui Tekau rna wha Maehe 1992 Orakei Settlement - At Last One of the most contentious land claims headed towards its final resolution with the passing of the Orakei Act 1991 late last year. The Act is very different from the 1978 legislation it replaces, reflecting the new environment for the settlement of Maori claims. The former legislation referred cautiously to an 'agreement' reached between the Crown and Maori, with regar...

3. HK v F Ltd [2024] NZDT 698 (7 November 2024) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 698 APPLICANT HK RESPONDENT F Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. HK purchased a F Ltd washer/drier in October 2019 from [retailer]. The machine was delivered to, and installed at, a rental property in [Town]. 2. In May 2024, a fault developed. A F Ltd repairer found a wire was broken on the motor plu...

4. TO v OM Ltd [2021] NZDT 1698 (20 May 2021) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1698 APPLICANT TO RESPONDENT OM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TO said that on 28 November 2020 he attempted to purchase a $2,986.00 camera from OM in [City 1]. He used his eftpos card, but the transaction was declined. He tried a second time, but it was again declined. He was...

5. BQ & LI v J Ltd [2023] NZDT 519 (13 October 2023) [pdf, 208 KB]

   ...District Court [2023] NZDT 519 APPLICANT BQ APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to pay BQ and LI the total sum of $5953.39 on or before Friday 3 November 2023. Reasons: 1. In October 2020, the Applicants purchased a 2 storey, 2 bedroom duplex from the first owner who bought it new from J Ltd (the company) in 2017. The Applicants claim that the roofing has failed within 5 years of being built and that it is not fit for purpose, and tha...

6. QL v OQ [2021] NZDT 1664 (22 June 2021) [pdf, 116 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1664 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT OQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2020 QL rented a chair in the [X] business operated by OQ. Their arrangement came to an end in January 2021, when QL says the arrangement was abruptly terminated by OQ. 2. QL’s claim is for $3,474.50. He init...

7. BI & Ors v W Ltd [2024] NZDT 403 (2 March 2024) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: W Ltd is to pay BI, BD, CD, EB, HW, HI, HN, NT, SS, TI, and UD, the sum of $4,994.33 on or before 23 March 2024. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Reasons: 1. The applicants planned a golfing trip [overseas], and booked return flights with W Ltd. Their booking was made with W Ltd’s Group Sales Team in July 2019, and the flights were to be in April and May 2020. However, due to the impact of the pa...

8. ED v CC [2022] NZDT 228 (25 November 2022) [pdf, 206 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 228 APPLICANT ED RESPONDENT CC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CC emailed ED regarding the purchase of quail eggs and quails. 2. ED replied sending some information and proposing some dates to send a breeding group of quails, eggs and feed. 3. CC responded saying that she would love to pro...

9. CN v B Ltd & ors [2024] NZDT 471 (31 May 2024) [pdf, 191 KB]

   ...‘signed’ acknowledgement from the customer to this effect. Allowing for the modern realities as to the manner in which contracts are entered into, I consider a ‘signed’ acknowledgement could be electronic, by way of completion of an on- line booking form. 10) The applicant says the relative booking was made by phone, and followed up with texts. The respondent says that its booking form (with its standard terms and conditions attached) was completed and it has submitted document...

10. [2012] NZEmpC 37 Anto v Planet Spice Ltd [pdf, 68 KB]

    ANTO V PLANET SPICE LIMITED NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 37 [1 March 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 37 WRC 39/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN ALEXANDER ANTO Plaintiff AND PLANET SPICE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Counsel: Daniel Vincent, counsel for the plaintiff Paul McBride, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 1 March 2012 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A...