12860 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1698 APPLICANT TO RESPONDENT OM Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. TO said that on 28 November 2020 he attempted to purchase a $2,986.00 camera from OM in [City 1]. He used his eftpos card, but the transaction was declined. He tried a second time, but it was again declined. He was...
...District Court [2023] NZDT 519 APPLICANT BQ APPLICANT LI RESPONDENT J Ltd The Tribunal orders: J Ltd is to pay BQ and LI the total sum of $5953.39 on or before Friday 3 November 2023. Reasons: 1. In October 2020, the Applicants purchased a 2 storey, 2 bedroom duplex from the first owner who bought it new from J Ltd (the company) in 2017. The Applicants claim that the roofing has failed within 5 years of being built and that it is not fit for purpose, and tha...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1664 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT OQ The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In July 2020 QL rented a chair in the [X] business operated by OQ. Their arrangement came to an end in January 2021, when QL says the arrangement was abruptly terminated by OQ. 2. QL’s claim is for $3,474.50. He init...
...APPLICANT UD RESPONDENT W Ltd The Tribunal orders: W Ltd is to pay BI, BD, CD, EB, HW, HI, HN, NT, SS, TI, and UD, the sum of $4,994.33 on or before 23 March 2024. CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 4 Reasons: 1. The applicants planned a golfing trip [overseas], and booked return flights with W Ltd. Their booking was made with W Ltd’s Group Sales Team in July 2019, and the flights were to be in April and May 2020. However, due to the impact of the pa...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 228 APPLICANT ED RESPONDENT CC The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. CC emailed ED regarding the purchase of quail eggs and quails. 2. ED replied sending some information and proposing some dates to send a breeding group of quails, eggs and feed. 3. CC responded saying that she would love to pro...
...‘signed’ acknowledgement from the customer to this effect. Allowing for the modern realities as to the manner in which contracts are entered into, I consider a ‘signed’ acknowledgement could be electronic, by way of completion of an on- line booking form. 10) The applicant says the relative booking was made by phone, and followed up with texts. The respondent says that its booking form (with its standard terms and conditions attached) was completed and it has submitted document...
ANTO V PLANET SPICE LIMITED NZEmpC WN [2012] NZEmpC 37 [1 March 2012] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON [2012] NZEmpC 37 WRC 39/10 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN ALEXANDER ANTO Plaintiff AND PLANET SPICE LIMITED Defendant Hearing: (on the papers) Counsel: Daniel Vincent, counsel for the plaintiff Paul McBride, counsel for the defendant Judgment: 1 March 2012 COSTS JUDGMENT OF JUDGE A...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 171 APPLICANT MH RESPONDENT NB Ltd The Tribunal orders: NB Ltd is to pay MH $1,028.85 within 28 days. Reasons [1] MH claims that NB Ltd, represented by director EN, unsatisfactorily carried out repair work to her car, and claims $1,312.84 as compensation. EN denies liability. [2] MH’s case is set out in detail in...
...issue [99] The propensity evidence tendered by Mr Taylor [106] The allegation of bad faith [108] Summary of case for Corrections [114] Key findings [117] THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS [120] Interference with privacy - definition [120] Decisions on requests [121] APPLICATION OF THE STATUTORY PROVISIONS TO THE FACTS [126] The concessions made by Corrections in relation to liability [130] THE QUESTION OF REMEDY [135] The question of a training order [138] The conduct of the defendant...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 292 APPLICANT BN RESPONDENT D Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In October 2023, BN purchased a horse ([the horse]) from D Ltd for the purpose of developing [the horse] for himself to compete in dressage and show jumping events to a high level. 2. BN claims $24,155.06 on the basis that due to a p...