12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1564 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT and Respondent to counter claim LQ APPLICANT OT APPLICANT XT RESPONDENT and Applicant to counter claim ON SECOND RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. LQ is to pay ON $425.00 on or before 20 March 2019. Reasons: 1. LQ, OT, and XT and KT brought...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2015] NZDT 795 BETWEEN BP APPLICANT AND YK RESPONDENT Date of Order: 13 July 2015 Referee: Referee Paton-Simpson ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is struck out. Reasons: [1] The parties were in a de facto relationship for around six years. During the relationship, YK established a family trust known as the ABC Trust, with her three sons as the beneficiaries. The...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2009] NZDT 199 BETWEEN ADC APPLICANT AND ZWY RESPONDENT Date of Order: 31 July 2009 Referee: Referee ter Haar ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZWY’s claim against ADC is dismissed, and ADC’s counterclaim is successful. ZWY is ordered to pay ADC the sum of $223.44 within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] ADC and ZWY were engaged...
...(Property) which at the hearing AH said was owned jointly by AH and AH’s mother, UB (who passed away in October 2020). However, it transpires that the Property was owned solely by UB. 2. KM was engaged to do painting work at the Property. AH claims the work done was substandard. 3. When the claim was lodged AH had an enduring power of attorney to act on behalf of her mother who had dementia. By the time of the last hearing her mother had passed away (as mentioned above). AH is an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 188 APPLICANT BN and KN as trustees for the N Trust RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. BN and KN are to pay I Ltd $2,827.56 within 28 days. Reasons [1] BN and KN claim from I Ltd, represented by TN, $2,697.07. The Ns say that this sum is owing for unprocessed [nuts] that were provided to I Ltd before th...
...you, or the court, have received a payment from the debtor or someone else on their behalf in the last 12 months. Apply for approval (leave of the court) You need to apply to the district court where the judgment order was made. Fill in the form:Application to enforce a judgment over 6 years Pay the feeOn the application you can ask for the fee to be added to what the debtor owes. Cost you can claimCivil Enforcement Fees Find a district court
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 457 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. In July of 2022, EX first spoke to QU about building a new lawn and garden at his home. In September of 2022, QU provided a quote accepted by EX, and the work...
...HNZ was to be routed through Ms Chandler, a Consumer Engagement Manager employed by HNZ. HNZ’s evidence also addressed its reasons for believing that Dr Van Wey Lovatt had requested the change of address. Together with its evidence, HNZ filed an application seeking orders striking out Dr Van Wey Lovatt’s claim on the basis that it was vexatious, not brought in good faith, disclosed no reasonable cause of action and was an abuse of the process of the Tribunal. [6] On 15 November 20...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2019] NZDT 1215 BETWEEN HX APPLICANT AND RC RESPONDENT Date of Order: 17 May 2019 Referee: Referee: J Perfect ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that the claim is dismissed. Facts [1] Mr HX purchased a house from Mr RC in 2015, with ongoing repayments due to City Council under a “Home” programme attached to the property rates, and therefore payable by the new owner. [2]...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 155 APPLICANT SM RESPONDENT APPLICANT’S INSURER D Ltd GN The Tribunal orders: D Ltd is to pay $28,569.28 to SM on or before 7 June 2023; and D Ltd is to pay $1430.72 (being $1130.72 insured loss and $300.00 uninsured loss) directly to GN on or before 7 June 2023. Reasons 1. SM engaged D Ltd to carry out...