12513 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1542 APPLICANT EI RESPONDENT BI APPLICANT'S INSURER JBH Limited The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 30 July 2019, while cycling past [location], BI hit a parked car owned by EI, causing damage to the right side of the car. 2. EI and his insurer JBH Limited...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 25 APPLICANT TC RESPONDENT DG The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In late December 2022, DG posted on Facebook Marketplace that she had some decorations to sell from her wedding. One of these was a round archway advertised as containing approximately $600.00 worth of various faux flowers. The...
...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...
...decision - s 6(1), claims process – ss 134-161, Accident Compensation Act 2001 (“the Act”)] Introduction [1] This is an appeal from the decision of a Reviewer dated 13 April 2023. The Reviewer dismissed, for lack of jurisdiction, an application for review of the Corporation’s email dated 21 November 2022, on the basis that this was not a reviewable decision. 2 Background [2] On 25 December 2020, Ms Morris was walking down a steep hill. She slipped and fell...
...of the guarantee of acceptable quality in the Consumer Guarantees Act? b. If yes, is IO Ltd liable for damages, and if so how much, for the following: i. Refund or replacement ii. Consequential financial losses iii. Consequential losses in the form of emotional harm. c. If yes, is TF Ltd liable for damages, and if so how much, for the following: CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 2 of 5 i. Refund or replacement ii. Consequential financial losses iii. Consequential losses in the form of...
IN THE ENVIRONMENT COURT AT AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAIAO O AOTEAROA KI TAMAKI MAKAURAU Decision [2024] NZEnvC 062 IN THE MATTER OF an application for enforcement order under s 314 of the Resource Management Act 1991 BETWEEN GISBORNE DISTRICT COUNCIL (ENV-2023-AKL-159) Applicant AND CHINA FORESTRY GROUP NEW ZEALAND COMPANY LIMITED First Respondent AND YUXIA SUN Second Respondent AND WOOD MARKETING SERVICES LIMITED Third Respondent AND IN THE MATTER OF an applicatio...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 380 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT EI APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by KH and J Ltd against EI is proved. EI is to pay J Ltd the sum of $12,198.48 on or by 30 June 2024. Reasons 1. Four vehicles were traveling south on State Highway One approaching or crossing a b...
...carpark. 3. KM has applied for a declaration of non-liability (which is only available for claims in contract). He clarified at the first hearing that he is willing to pay the $95.00 fee, but not the subsequent collection costs and interest claimed by Q Ltd. 4. Q Ltd filed a counterclaim against TB. The amount claimed in the application is $1,000.00, although NS (on behalf of Q Ltd) clarified that the claim is for $426.51 plus ongoing interest. Background 5. After KM receive...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 178 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: Claim Dismissed. REASONS 1. In September 2020, DT purchased a [redacted] umbrella from N Ltd for $199.00. Two years and four months later (when the umbrella was four months out of warranty) the components of the internal rib mechanism failed. DT initially request...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 85 APPLICANT XQ RESPONDENT T Ltd The Tribunal orders: T Ltd is to pay XQ $107.61 on or before 25 February 2022. Reasons 1. On about 4 October 2021, XQ bought an automotive [item] from T Ltd through Trademe. He asked a mechanic to install the [item]. When installed, the mechanic found the vehicle did not run correctly....