12939 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 2 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 671 APPLICANT MG & MT RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: CH is to pay the sum of $10,000.00 to MG & MT on or before Monday 16 September 2024. Reasons: 1. On 20 May 2024, the applicants MG and MT contacted CH after seeing an advertisement for sale of CH’s restaurant property. They negotiated a price, and CH said he would ne...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 217 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT HF SECOND RESPONDENT OF The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by H Ltd against HF is proved and HF is to pay H Ltd the sum of $14,293.58 on or by 08 December 2022. 2. The claim by H Ltd against OF is struck out. Reasons 1. In 2018, H Ltd entered into a contract with HF. H L...
...on 6 March 2012. [3] Unfortunately, Mr Pue was subsequently killed in an accident. No further submissions appear to have been received from Mr Waikerepuru. 295 Aotea MB 14 [4] Prior to that representatives of Todd Corporation Ltd also requested the opportunity to file submissions regarding the application. [5] The issue for determination is whether or not the Court has jurisdiction to consider the application. Submissions for the Applicant [6] Mr Pue provides a detailed...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 13 APPLICANT LT RESPONDENT NL The Tribunal orders: NL is to pay LT the amount of $30,000 on or before 30 May 2022. Reason 1. The dispute concerns $30,000 belonging to LT which was in the possession of NL and which LT wishes to be returned. 2. LT and NL have known each other for many years having been in busine...
...the agreement. 9. There is a clear contradiction between paragraph B of the Introduction and paragraph 11.1. The first paragraph says the business was sold as a going concern and the second says it was not. Clause 11.1 benefits BC, as it could claim back the GST on the sale price if it was not a going concern. 10. HI says she was presented with a copy of the contract on the day she signed it and was in a bit of a hurry. She noticed the statement in the Introduction that the sale wa...
...migration category application for a visa, on the grounds the relevant employment not meeting the criteria. On 5 August 2015, he applied for a student visa. Immigration New Zealand sent a letter requesting a response to potentially prejudicial information to the lawyers acting for him at that time. However, Immigration New Zealand declined the application on 19 October 2015. At that point, the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully without a visa. [7.2] On 30 October 2015, the com...
...out in a single pour, but due to a delay with one of the concrete trucks, it was poured at different times resulting in a compromised finish in the area where the different pours meet. The surface of the driveway has extensive patchy areas and the applicants says that Gap 20 was not laid to the depth discussed at the outset. 3. NW and NG claim $5000.00 in compensation for the compromised quality of the finished driveway, $2500.00 for the damage to the shared driveway, $1000.00 for menta...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 693 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT KC SECOND RESPONDENT ZX The Tribunal orders: 1. ZX is joined as a respondent. 2. The claim against KC is struck out. 3. ZX is to pay OT $330.00 on or before 2 January 2024. Reasons Introduction 1. In September 2023, OT won a [camera] from [an online] auction being run by user identification [userna...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1387 APPLICANT JC RESPONDENT KB The Tribunal hereby orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. During the course of a de facto relationship of some ten months duration, Ms C says that she loaned Mr B money on numerous occasions with an agreement that he would repay her each pay day. At the end of their relationship...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 741 APPLICANT B Ltd RESPONDENT DT The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In June 2023 TI, DT’s ex-husband uplifted a courtesy car from B Ltd for the use of their daughter, NB, while DT’s car was being repaired. The car being repaired had been bought by DT for their daughter from B Ltd. 2. On 15 June 2023 NB...