12924 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 510 APPLICANT KB RESPONDENT NX The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. On 24 January 2024 KB entered into an agreement to purchase a section from NX. The section did not have a house as it had burnt down, and the debris had been removed. All that remained was an old garage with an attached carport, which contai...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 522 APPLICANT QU RESPONDENT UQ APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) J Ltd The Tribunal orders: UQ is to pay J Ltd $6,420.80 by 31 July 2024. Reasons 1. QU and UQ were involved in an accident on [road] on 13 June 2023. 2. QU stopped at a pedestrian crossing. UQ failed to stop and hit the rear of QU’s [vehicle]....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 121 APPLICANT OB RESPONDENT CM The Tribunal orders: 1. CM trading as X Co is to pay $72.00 to OB by the 16th May 2024. 2. Upon receipt of payment, OB is to return her damaged dog collar to CM trading as D Co within 7 days of receipt. Reasons 1. OB purchased a dog collar from CM for a “large strong dog” online for $72 including fre...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 2 APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT Q Ltd APPLICANT'S INSURER (if applicable) DM Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. 2. In terms of the counterclaim HT is to pay Q Ltd $1,552.50 on or before 5.00pm on 2 February 2024. Reasons: 1. HT decided to use Q Ltd for cleaning after she was the victim of a ram...
...an additional defendant, “CityMed Medical Centre”, to the proceeding. This is the name of the practice where Dr Culpan saw Ms Guo. [8] On 1 May 2018, the Co-Chairperson issued a Minute where, amongst other things, she declined Ms Guo’s application to file the amended claim. Leaving aside the issue of jurisdiction, the filing of evidence in the claim was by then complete, and a fixture had been allocated for 14 May 2018. In these circumstances, the Co-Chairperson stated she...
...adviser, lawyer or included in certain other specific categories of persons. There are some limited exceptions to the general principle, but the restriction applies everywhere in the world. [3] The regime requires licensed immigration advisers to perform the services personally. They are different from other professionals who can usually allow non-qualified staff to provide many services under the supervision of a qualified professional. [4] This Tribunal, unfortunately, has been...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 22 APPLICANT HH APPLICANT HT RESPONDENT WT Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. WT Ltd is to pay HH and HT $25.00 each, being a total of $50.00 on or before 5pm on 28 March 2023. Reasons 1. HH and HT paid $65.00 each for a bottomless brunch at WT Ltd. They were told, after they ordered their first round of food, that
...pursuant to s 279 and s 285 of the Act on the papers A Burgoyne (Applicant for Costs) A Green for Motutangi-Waiharara Water Users Group (Applicants for Costs) G Mathias for Northland Regional Council 1 3 MAR 2020 1 3 MAR 2020 DECISION ON APPLICATION FOR COSTS A BURGOYNE /TE TAUMATA KAUMATUA O NGATI KURI RESEARCH UNIT v NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL (DECISION) 2 A: The Court makes no Order as to costs for the reasons set out in this Decision. The file may be closed. B:...
...by email. 6. In the hearing, I gave BM a copy of X Ltd.’s 31 March 2021 email, a copy of s 10 of the Disputes Tribunal Act and a copy of my 13 January 2021 order. I gave BM an opportunity to adjourn the hearing and seek advice about that information. He declined that opportunity. Therefore, I am making this decision on the information presented in the hearings to date. 7. The issue to determine is whether the Disputes Tribunal has the jurisdiction to hear this claim. Doe...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1342 APPLICANT NO Ltd RESPONDENT JL Limited SECOND RESPONDENT SI The Tribunal orders: SI is liable to pay NO Limited $4,156.98 on or before 20 February 2021. Reasons 1. SI accepts responsibility for a vehicle accident that caused damage to one of NO’s power poles in May last year. NO says it has co...