Search Results

1. IT & NH v UN Ltd [2022] NZDT 163 (25 October 2022) [pdf, 257 KB]

   ...$1,240.00 (50%) as a deposit. When the model was available, Mr O of the Responder sent photos of the model to the Applicants. The Applicants were not happy with the results and refused to pay the remainder. They asked for a refund. They then filed a claim for a refund in the Disputes Tribunal. The Respondent filed a counterclaim for the amount outstanding. 2. This is a claim for a refund and a counterclaim for the remaining balance to be paid, both in the sum of $1,240.00....

2. BD v ED [2020] NZDT 1383 (17 December 2020) [pdf, 180 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1383 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT ED The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BD purchased a power meter from ED on a website titled “CT”. He alleges ED misrepresented the condition of the power meter and broke the rules of CT by refusing to refund the money he paid for the power meter. He claim...

3. QL v E Ltd [2023] NZDT 752 (1 December 2023) [pdf, 182 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 752 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QL purchased two laminated Gortex motorcycle jackets from E Ltd on 2 February 2022, one for himself and one for a friend. 2. On 4 July 2023, QL was out on a 3 day ride and noticed that a small patch on the front of one of the wrist cuffs had d...

4. KH v BG [2024] NZDT 464 (29 May 2024) [pdf, 181 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 464 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT BG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KH had a pre-existing personal guarantee to pay rent. KH says BG agreed, when she became a director in the company, she would guarantee the rent liability under cl 5.9 of the sale and purchase agreement. The company went into liquidatio...

5. DO v CH [2024] NZDT 576 (29 July 2024) [pdf, 189 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 576 APPLICANT DO RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DO is the head tenant of a property on [Address] and listed a room [online]. As a result, CH moved into the flatting situation and signed a fixed term agreement from 1 February 2024 to 8 May 2024. The agreement did not include a notice period c...

6. SQ v KL & L Ltd [2023] NZDT 180 (22 June 2023) [pdf, 196 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 180 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT KL SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SQ against KL is dismissed. 2. The claim by SQ against L Ltd is proved and L Ltd is to pay SQ the sum of $13,820.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 15 July 2023. 3. The counterclaim by L Ltd against SQ is dismissed. Reasons 1....

7. NX & PX v Airline X [2022] NZDT 181 (28 September 2022) [pdf, 214 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 181 APPLICANT NX APPLICANT PX RESPONDENT Airline X The Tribunal orders: [Airline X] is to pay to NX and PX the sum of $1,298.20 on or before 20 October 2022. Reasons: 1. NX and PX (“the applicants”) booked flights directly with [Airline X] in May 2022. They were scheduled to travel from [City A] to [Cit...

8. ABR v ZYN and ZYM [2013] NZDT 35 (20 May 2013) [pdf, 91 KB]

   IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2013] NZDT 35 BETWEEN ABR Ltd APPLICANT AND ZYN Ltd FIRST RESPONDENT AND ZYM Ltd SECOND RESPONDENT Date of Order: 20 May 2013 Referee: Referee Edison ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZYN Ltd shall pay ABR Ltd the sum of $5,442.56 by 4pm on 3 June 2013. The claim against ZYM Ltd is dismissed. Facts [1] LG owns and runs a dairy in [a place...

9. BT v CH [2023] NZDT 30 (16 January 2023) [pdf, 175 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 30 APPLICANT BT RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: BT’s claim against CH is dismissed. Reasons: 1. The parties lived together for a period of time. The applicant claims the respondent agreed to make payments to him or contribute towards living expenses each week in lieu of rent and other costs. The applicant claims...

10. DN v NS [2024] NZDT 336 (23 May 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 336 APPLICANT DN RESPONDENT NS The Tribunal orders: NS is to pay DN $3,252.34 on or before 22 June 2024. Reasons Introduction 1. DN’s husband SN was driving her car at [location]. He came out of the main underground carpark and entered the roundabout. NS was in the right hand turning lane to the right of SN. NS turned left into SN. 2...