12493 items matching your search terms
...LTD NZEmpC AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 101 [30 June 2015] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2015] NZEmpC 101 EMPC 61/15 IN THE MATTER OF an application to file a cross-challenge out of time BETWEEN DAVID GEORGETTI Applicant AND COMPASS COMMUNICATONS LTD Respondent Hearing: 29 June 2015 (Heard at Auckland) Appearances: S Hornsby-Geluk and M Harrop, counsel for applicant D Organ, advocate for respondent Judgment:...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 28 APPLICANT C Ltd B Ltd RESPONDDNT SU The Tribunal orders: 1. B Ltd is joined as an applicant to this claim. 2. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. In October 2022, B Ltd provided a quote to SU for the re-roofing of a property in [Town]. 2. Between February and April 2023 there were some further discussions be...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2017] NZDT 1447 APPLICANT TQ Limited RESPONDENT MQ The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. The claim is struck out. 2. A rehearing will be granted if TQ Limited provides a ruling from the Employment Relations Authority stating that the matter is outside its jurisdiction. Reasons: 1. On 2 May 2016, Mr Q was hired as an employe...
Notice to be heard on an interim harmful digital communications order to be made final R23 HARMFUL DIGITAL COMMUNCATIONS RULES 2016 When to use this form Use this form if you have received a ‘Notice to the Defendant’ from the court advising that an interim harmful digital communications order is issued to you and you wish to be heard on whether that interim order should be made final. In this form, tell us your reasons for applying and what facts you rely on to support this...
...you, or the court, have received a payment from the debtor or someone else on their behalf in the last 12 months. Apply for approval (leave of the court) You need to apply to the district court where the judgment order was made. Fill in the form:Application to enforce a judgment over 6 years Pay the feeOn the application you can ask for the fee to be added to what the debtor owes. Cost you can claimCivil Enforcement Fees Find a district court
...(Property) which at the hearing AH said was owned jointly by AH and AH’s mother, UB (who passed away in October 2020). However, it transpires that the Property was owned solely by UB. 2. KM was engaged to do painting work at the Property. AH claims the work done was substandard. 3. When the claim was lodged AH had an enduring power of attorney to act on behalf of her mother who had dementia. By the time of the last hearing her mother had passed away (as mentioned above). AH is an...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 188 APPLICANT BN and KN as trustees for the N Trust RESPONDENT I Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. BN and KN are to pay I Ltd $2,827.56 within 28 days. Reasons [1] BN and KN claim from I Ltd, represented by TN, $2,697.07. The Ns say that this sum is owing for unprocessed [nuts] that were provided to I Ltd before th...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 457 APPLICANT EX RESPONDENT QU The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed 2. The counterclaim is dismissed. Reasons: Introduction: 1. In July of 2022, EX first spoke to QU about building a new lawn and garden at his home. In September of 2022, QU provided a quote accepted by EX, and the work...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2019] NZDT 1564 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT and Respondent to counter claim LQ APPLICANT OT APPLICANT XT RESPONDENT and Applicant to counter claim ON SECOND RESPONDENT UN The Tribunal hereby orders: 1. LQ is to pay ON $425.00 on or before 20 March 2019. Reasons: 1. LQ, OT, and XT and KT brought...
IN THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2009] NZDT 199 BETWEEN ADC APPLICANT AND ZWY RESPONDENT Date of Order: 31 July 2009 Referee: Referee ter Haar ORDER OF THE DISPUTES TRIBUNAL The Tribunal hereby orders that ZWY’s claim against ADC is dismissed, and ADC’s counterclaim is successful. ZWY is ordered to pay ADC the sum of $223.44 within ten days of the date of this order. Facts [1] ADC and ZWY were engaged...