12870 items matching your search terms
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 374 APPLICANT KT APPLICANT NT RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay $2,587.50 to KT and NT by the 21st June 2024. Reasons 1. KT and NT contracted N Ltd to lay concrete at their home. Whilst laying concrete on the driveway adjacent to the garage, concrete was splashed on to the new garage door. The same day as the p
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 549 APPLICANT QC RESPONDENT S Ltd The Tribunal orders: S Ltd is to pay QC $90.00 on or before 16 August 2024. Reasons 1. In about February 2024, QC won [an online] auction for a torque wrench from S Ltd trading as YD. He had won other items from this seller previously and the seller agreed to hold them all for him until he could pi...
...Reservation Trust) has applied to remove all trustees of the Reservation Trust under s 240 of Te Ture Whenua Māori Act 1993 (the Act) (Removal Application).2 [2] Ms Puohotaua alleges that the trustees have failed to act in several respects and claims that there is no confidence in the current trustees as evidenced by a ‘vote of no confidence’ at an online hui held on 10 March 2023 (Special Beneficiary Hui). [3] The sole issue for determination is whether the current Reservation...
...Insurance Tribunal (“the Tribunal”), as committed to in the Labour Party’s 2017 election manifesto, to provide an alternative pathway for claimants, the Earthquake Commission (EQC) and insurers to resolve outstanding earthquake-related insurance claims. Executive Summary 2 The 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquakes generated insurance claims in relation to over 167,677 residential properties. 98% of these claims have settled. However, seven years on, 2% of claims remain unresolve...
...$1,240.00 (50%) as a deposit. When the model was available, Mr O of the Responder sent photos of the model to the Applicants. The Applicants were not happy with the results and refused to pay the remainder. They asked for a refund. They then filed a claim for a refund in the Disputes Tribunal. The Respondent filed a counterclaim for the amount outstanding. 2. This is a claim for a refund and a counterclaim for the remaining balance to be paid, both in the sum of $1,240.00....
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 752 APPLICANT QL RESPONDENT E Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. QL purchased two laminated Gortex motorcycle jackets from E Ltd on 2 February 2022, one for himself and one for a friend. 2. On 4 July 2023, QL was out on a 3 day ride and noticed that a small patch on the front of one of the wrist cuffs had d...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 464 APPLICANT KH RESPONDENT BG The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. KH had a pre-existing personal guarantee to pay rent. KH says BG agreed, when she became a director in the company, she would guarantee the rent liability under cl 5.9 of the sale and purchase agreement. The company went into liquidatio...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 576 APPLICANT DO RESPONDENT CH The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DO is the head tenant of a property on [Address] and listed a room [online]. As a result, CH moved into the flatting situation and signed a fixed term agreement from 1 February 2024 to 8 May 2024. The agreement did not include a notice period c...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2020] NZDT 1383 APPLICANT BD RESPONDENT ED The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. BD purchased a power meter from ED on a website titled “CT”. He alleges ED misrepresented the condition of the power meter and broke the rules of CT by refusing to refund the money he paid for the power meter. He claim...
CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 180 APPLICANT SQ RESPONDENT KL SECOND RESPONDENT L Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by SQ against KL is dismissed. 2. The claim by SQ against L Ltd is proved and L Ltd is to pay SQ the sum of $13,820.00 on or by 5:00 pm on 15 July 2023. 3. The counterclaim by L Ltd against SQ is dismissed. Reasons 1....