Search Results

1. NW & NG v TM Ltd [2023] NZDT 579 (16 November 2023) [pdf, 115 KB]

   ...out in a single pour, but due to a delay with one of the concrete trucks, it was poured at different times resulting in a compromised finish in the area where the different pours meet. The surface of the driveway has extensive patchy areas and the applicants says that Gap 20 was not laid to the depth discussed at the outset. 3. NW and NG claim $5000.00 in compensation for the compromised quality of the finished driveway, $2500.00 for the damage to the shared driveway, $1000.00 for menta...

2. OIA-97004.pdf [pdf, 810 KB]

   0 3 AUG 2022 Section (9) (2) (a) Tena koe - Justice Centre I 19 Aitken Street DX SX10088 I Wellington T 04 918 8800 I F 04 918 8820 ContactUs@j ustice.govt.nz I www.justice.govt.nz Our ref: OIA 97004 Official Information Act 1982 request: Information regarding civil disputes Thank you for your letter of 23 June 2022 to the Ministry of Justice (the Ministry) requesting, under the Official Information Act 1982 (the Act) , information regarding civil disputes in the Disputes Tr...

3. H Ltd v HF & OF [2022] NZDT 217 (16 November 2022) [pdf, 208 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 217 APPLICANT H Ltd RESPONDENT HF SECOND RESPONDENT OF The Tribunal orders: 1. The claim by H Ltd against HF is proved and HF is to pay H Ltd the sum of $14,293.58 on or by 08 December 2022. 2. The claim by H Ltd against OF is struck out. Reasons 1. In 2018, H Ltd entered into a contract with HF. H L...

4. HI v BC Ltd [2024] NZDT 198 (28 March 2024) [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...the agreement. 9. There is a clear contradiction between paragraph B of the Introduction and paragraph 11.1. The first paragraph says the business was sold as a going concern and the second says it was not. Clause 11.1 benefits BC, as it could claim back the GST on the sale price if it was not a going concern. 10. HI says she was presented with a copy of the contract on the day she signed it and was in a bit of a hurry. She noticed the statement in the Introduction that the sale wa...

5. CX v WZ LCRO 251 / 2010 (20 June 2011) [pdf, 78 KB]

   LCRO 251/2010 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a determination of the Auckland Standards Committee 4 BETWEEN MS CX of Auckland Applicant AND MR WZ of Auckland Respondent The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed. DECISION Background [1] In 2009 the Applicant was in a relationship with Mr CY. Mr CY was the sol...

6. E v S [2017] NZIACDT 2 (13 March 2017) [pdf, 105 KB]

   ...migration category application for a visa, on the grounds the relevant employment not meeting the criteria. On 5 August 2015, he applied for a student visa. Immigration New Zealand sent a letter requesting a response to potentially prejudicial information to the lawyers acting for him at that time. However, Immigration New Zealand declined the application on 19 October 2015. At that point, the complainant was in New Zealand unlawfully without a visa. [7.2] On 30 October 2015, the com...

7. EH v MG & FG [2024] NZDT 425 (28 May 2024) [pdf, 186 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 425 APPLICANT EH RESPONDENT MG SECOND RESPONDENT FG The Tribunal orders: 1. MG and FG are to pay EH $1,255.00 on or before 21 June 2024. 2. The remainder of the claim is dismissed. Reasons Introduction 1. In 2021, MG and FG sold their property at [address] to EH. 2. In January 2024, while EH was selling the property, a potential...

8. Goher v Hammadieh [2015] NZIACDT 44 (22 April 2015) [pdf, 92 KB]

   ...complaint to the Tribunal. [2] The complaint is that Mr Hammadieh accepted instructions to lodge an expression of interest, and application for residence. The allegations are that he: [2.1] Gave negligent advice, as he told the complainant she could claims skills in an occupational category for which she did not have the qualifications or experience. He then proceeded to lodge an expression of interest with Immigration New Zealand, as the complainant did not qualify, the work he did wa...

9. Pue – Te Ika a Maui, Te Ika a Ngahue (Te Waipounamu), Rakihura and Rekohu (2012) 295 Aotea MB 13 (295 AOT 13) [pdf, 101 KB]

   ...on 6 March 2012. [3] Unfortunately, Mr Pue was subsequently killed in an accident. No further submissions appear to have been received from Mr Waikerepuru. 295 Aotea MB 14 [4] Prior to that representatives of Todd Corporation Ltd also requested the opportunity to file submissions regarding the application. [5] The issue for determination is whether or not the Court has jurisdiction to consider the application. Submissions for the Applicant [6] Mr Pue provides a detailed...

10. OT v KC & ZX [2023] NZDT 693 (14 December 2023) [pdf, 178 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 693 APPLICANT OT RESPONDENT KC SECOND RESPONDENT ZX The Tribunal orders: 1. ZX is joined as a respondent. 2. The claim against KC is struck out. 3. ZX is to pay OT $330.00 on or before 2 January 2024. Reasons Introduction 1. In September 2023, OT won a [camera] from [an online] auction being run by user identification [userna...