Search Results

1. Gibbons v Armour Guard [2018] NZHRRT 10 [pdf, 247 KB]

   ...telephone call. The Privacy Commissioner’s certificate of investigation named Armour Guard as the sole respondent to the complaint, and recorded the Commissioner’s opinion that there had been no interference with Mr Gibbons’ privacy as the information requested did not exist. [3] Mr Gibbons also complained to the Privacy Commissioner that the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) had refused to supply him with CCTV footage of the same incident. The certificate of investigation...

2. KQ v UN [2024] NZDT 52 (19 January 2024) [pdf, 127 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 52 APPLICANT KQ RESPONDENT UN APPLICANT'S INSURER J Ltd The Tribunal orders: 1. At the request of the parties, the respondent is changed from KN to UN. 2. UN is to pay the sum of $10,237.93 to J Ltd on or before Friday 9 February 2024. Reasons: 1. On 18 April 2023, KQ discovered that his [car 1] had been damaged while par...

3. D Ltd v NM [2024] NZDT 268 (3 April 2024) [pdf, 122 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 268 APPLICANT D Ltd RESPONDENT NM The Tribunal orders: NM is to pay to D Ltd the amount of $1,153.05. Payment is to be made on or before 10 May 2024. Reasons 1. In May 2023 the applicant, D Ltd accepted a request to carry out a specialized cleaning job on NM’s home. The work was completed and invoiced for $3,153.05. A payment was made...

4. LCRO 117/2022 VN v SC (16 May 2024) [pdf, 216 KB]

   ...[2024] NZLCRO 045 Ref: LCRO 117/2022 CONCERNING an application for review pursuant to section 193 of the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006 AND CONCERNING a decision of the [Area] Standards Committee [X] BETWEEN VN Applicant AND SC Respondent DECISION The names and identifying details of the parties in this decision have been changed Introduction [1] The applicant, Dr VN, has applied for review of a decision dated 23 June 2022 by the [...

5. [2008] NZEmpC WC 19A/08 Snowdon v Radio New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 45 KB]

   SNOWDON V RADIO NEW ZEALAND LTD WN WC 19A/08 11 December 2008 IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT WELLINGTON WC 19A/08 WRC 27/08 IN THE MATTER OF an application for a compliance order AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by the defendant for an order striking out the plaintiff's statement of claim BETWEEN LYNNE FRANCES SNOWDON Plaintiff AND RADIO NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 12 November 2008 (Heard at Wellington) Appearances: R A Moodie, Cou...

6. CX-v-XC-Law-Firm-2015-NZDT-885-16-July-2015 [pdf, 118 KB]

   ...but has subsequently sought to challenge it and continue with an appeal. [4] XC Law Firm have invoiced $5,045.55 for these services and CX requests a declaration of non-liability for that amount and for contractual interest added. XC Law Firm claim contractual interest of $1,068.97 to the date of the Tribunal hearing and submitted a counter-claim for payment of $5,742.47 including contractual interest to the date the claim was lodged. Issues [5] The issues to determine are:...

7. Reekie v Corrections (Extension of Time) [2018] NZHRRT 15 [pdf, 73 KB]

   ...Regulations 2002 provides that a defendant who intends to defend proceedings must, within 30 days after the day on which the notice of proceedings is served on him or her, file in the office of the Tribunal a statement of reply to the plaintiff’s claim and must serve a copy of the statement of reply on the plaintiff and any other party. [2] In the present case the statement of reply was due to be filed on 20 April 2018. 1 [This decis...

8. [2023] NZEmpC 160 A Labour Inspector of the Ministry of Business, Innovation, and Employment v Airways Corp of New Zealand Ltd [pdf, 113 KB]

   ...Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appearances: G La Hood, counsel for plaintiff G Davenport, counsel for defendants Judgment: 25 September 2023 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF JUDGE B A CORKILL [1] In the statement of claim filed by the plaintiff in this case, it sought declarations under s 6(5) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (the Act) in respect of three individuals, one of whom was Stuart Balchin. It was alleged he was an employee of either or bot...

9. L Ltd v N Ltd [2022] NZDT 247 (30 November 2022) [pdf, 236 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 247 APPLICANT L Ltd RESPONDENT N Ltd The Tribunal orders: N Ltd is to pay L Ltd $15,000.00 by 12 December 2022. Background 1. L Ltd is a retail jeweller with shops in New Zealand. 2. N Ltd is an insurance company based in [City]. 3. At N Ltd.’s request, L Ltd provided a valuation for items of jewellery....

10. LL v KN [2024] NZDT 369 (27 June 2024) [pdf, 173 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 369 APPLICANT LL RESPONDENT KN The Tribunal orders: KN is to pay LL $560.00 on or before 18 July 2024. Reasons 1. LL entered into a flatmate agreement with KN from September 2023 to May 2024. After the contract ended KN refused to refund LL’s bond because of concerns about damage to the house. 2. LL claims a refund of her bon...