Search Results

1. Legal aid fee schedule for CMM [pdf, 185 KB]

   ...specified: request further initial disclosure from prosecution (after commencement of proceedings) receiving and reviewing further initial disclosure receiving and reviewing full disclosure (after not guilty plea, election, or first appearance) requesting additional disclosure interlocutory applications: o Application for address of witness or informant o Application for disclosure of information – s30 o Application for order setting conditions for viewing exhibit – s31...

2. [2010] NZCA 56 CA14/2010 Petersons Global Sales Ltd v PB Engineering Ltd Ors [pdf, 33 KB]

   ...seek interim relief or an order under s 215 referring the case back to the Employment Court to restore an order of the Employment Relations Authority, set aside by the Employment Court, to restrain the respondents’ use of intellectual property claimed by the applicants. [2] By s 214(1) an appeal to this Court lies only on the ground that the decision of the Employment Court was wrong in law. By subs (3) leave may be given only if the question of law is one that, by reason of it...

3. HF v IU Ltd [2021] NZDT 1566 (28 July 2021) [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehearing, you can apply online, download a form from the Disputes Tribunal website or obtain an application form from any Tribunal office. The application must be lodged within 20 working days of the decision having been made. If you are applying outside of the 20 working day timeframe, you must also fill out an Application for Reheari...

4. [2024] NZEmpC 75 Opai v Commissioner of Police [pdf, 161 KB]

   MELISSA OPAI v THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE [2024] NZEmpC 75 [13 May 2024] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT OF NEW ZEALAND AUCKLAND I TE KŌTI TAKE MAHI O AOTEAROA TĀMAKI MAKAURAU [2024] NZEmpC 75 EMPC 116/2024 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to extend time to file a challenge to a determination of the Employment Relations Authority BETWEEN MELISSA OPAI Plaintiff AND THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Defendant Hearing: On the papers Appear...

5. Lawson v Intended Defendant (Extension of Time to Commence Proceedings) [2023] NZHRRT 20 [pdf, 198 KB]

   ...Intended Defendant DATE OF HEARING: Heard on the papers DATE OF DECISION: 15 August 2023 DECISION OF DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON REJECTIONG APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMMENCE PROCEEDINGS1 [1] The Tribunal received Miss Lawson’s claim on 9 March 2022, approximately 11 months after the Privacy Commissioner gave notice on 8 April 2021 that he intended not to take action on a complaint she had made to his office. Accordingly, a jurisdictional issue arises as Miss Lawson�...

6. M Ltd v P Ltd [2023] NZDT 416 (30 August 2023) [pdf, 200 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 416 APPLICANT M Ltd RESPONDENT P Ltd The Tribunal orders: P Ltd is to pay to M Ltd the sum of $3,266.85 on or before 21 September 2023. Reasons: 1. In April 2023, M Ltd paid a sum of $18.10 to P Ltd for some juice. 2. On the same date, M Ltd also paid a sum of $2,777.25 to P Ltd in error. That money was sup...

7. DT v KI [2023] NZDT 294 (19 July 2023) [pdf, 195 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 294 APPLICANT DT RESPONDENT KI The Tribunal orders: The claim is dismissed. Reasons: 1. DT, the applicant, and BI, acting as a representative for her mother, KI, the respondent, both attended the hearing by teleconference. 2. DT claimed $80.00 from the respondent, which included a claim for $35.00 in unpaid lawn...

8. KC v UD [2021] NZDT 1556 (8 September 2021) [pdf, 158 KB]

   (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2021] NZDT 1556 APPLICANT KC RESPONDENT UD The Tribunal orders: 1. KC’s claim that he is not liable to repay a $3,000 deposit to UD is dismissed. 2. KC is to pay $3,000 to UD on or before 30 September 2021. REASONS Brief Details of Claim 3. UD responded to an advertisement on Trade Me and on 16 June 2021 agreed to purchase a caravan from KC for $22,000 that...

9. O'Hagan v Police (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 28 [pdf, 614 KB]

   ...REPRESENTATION: Mr DA O’Hagan in person Ms V McCall and Ms L Dittrich for defendant DATE OF HEARING: 21, 22 and 23 March 2018 DATE OF DECISION: 5 June 2020 DATE OF COSTS DECISION: 23 July 2020 DECISION OF TRIBUNAL ON COSTS APPLICATION BY PLAINTIFF1 1 [This decision is to be cited as: O’Hagan v Police (Costs) [2020] NZHRRT 28. Note publication restrictions.] IN THE HUMAN RIGHTS REVIEW TRIBUNAL [2020]...

10. LC v DB [2023] NZDT 161 (2 June 2023) [pdf, 104 KB]

    CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 161 APPLICANT LC RESPONDENT DB The Tribunal orders: DB is to pay LC $2,000.00 on or before 4 July 2023. Reasons 1. LC purchased a [vehicle] registration [redacted] from DB on TradeMe. The purchase price was paid in full on 21 November 2022 and the vehicle was delivered to him in [City 1] from [City 2] by transporter...