Search Results

1. AA v BB [2024] NZDT 80 (26 February 2024) [pdf, 103 KB]

   ...claim and BB did not attend to present his counterclaim, it is not necessary to determine the third issue. 15. The claim and counterclaim are dismissed. Referee: G.M. Taylor Date: 26 February 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a...

2. LCRO 117/2017 LA v KB (11 December 2019) [pdf, 157 KB]

   ...lodged a complaint with the Lawyers Complaints Service on 17 November 2016. He said he did so in his capacity as a trustee of the NB Trust, whose interests he said were “creditors” in the liquidator’s claim against the Council. [14] He requested an investigation into Mr BAK’s “fee and its structure” which he said was unfair to him, and to the public at large. He sought a refund of the fees charged by Mr BAK, and disciplinary sanction by way of a fine against Mr BAK....

3. [2007] NZEmpC AC 19/07 Cuttriss v Carter Holt Harvey Ltd [pdf, 106 KB]

   ...be maintained on existing terms and conditions. Southern Cross Benefits will continue as currently provided. [I observe this Plan is not the same as KSP433.] … 16. COMPANY POLICIES The Company has policies, guidelines and procedures that form part of your terms of employment and you must comply with them at all times. The policies, guidelines and procedures are readily available on the Carter Holt Harvey Human Resources Intranet site and you should familiarise yourself with t...

4. Form 4 Criminal legal aid [pdf, 372 KB]

   Templates V13 – November 2017 page 1 11/17 form 4 Legal aid file no. Tax Invoice Criminal Legal Aid Invoice date Invoice number GST number Lead provider’s ref. CRNs To: Legal Aid, DX Box Number City Name of aided person Name of lead provider Name of law firm Court type District Court High Court Court of Appeal Supreme Court Court location Description of proceedings Administration Case Review Case management...

5. KG v OAU [2022] NZDT 225 (29 November 2022) [pdf, 95 KB]

   ...had pulled over to change its tyre. KG said the pothole caused extensive damage to not only his tyre, but also to the rim of the wheel. 2. KG telephoned the police at 1.00pm and E, the contractors who are engaged by OAU to repair the roads, performed a temporary repair by 2.15pm that day. 3. KG claimed to be compensated for the loss that his insurer has not covered, being half of the cost of a new tyre and his excess. 4. The issues to resolve the claim are: (a) Did OAU ow...

6. BT v US [2023] NZDT 112 (11 May 2023) [pdf, 111 KB]

   ...set out in section 10 of the Disputes Tribunal Act 1988 and does not provide for such a claim to be heard by it. Referee: L Thompson CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 3 of 4 Date: 11 May 2023 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a rehe...

7. D Ltd v G Ltd [2023] NZDT 371 (27 April 2023) [pdf, 110 KB]

   ...rights, it appears that D Ltd would be able to estimate the lost measurements back to the point at which it first went wrong. However, in practice, this is not how this is usually calculated. In the hearing today, TB from D Ltd said there was an informal “365 days maximum” policy which D Ltd applies for the benefit of the customer; that only the last year would be estimated and recovered, unless there was evidence of deliberate fraud. In this instance that meant that only the final 12...

8. KB v NX [2024] NZDT 510 (25 July 2024) [pdf, 184 KB]

   ...not disposed of and therefore it is fair that the loss, if any, lies where it falls. As KB has not proven his claim it is dismissed. Referee: Ms Cowie DTR Date: 25 July 2024 Page 3 of 3 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made: for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a reh...

9. QU v UQ & J Ltd [2024] NZDT 522 (9 July 2024) [pdf, 100 KB]

   ...sending him the final costs. He said that he wanted to get the claim resolved as soon as possible, but by the time that J Ltd sent him the final cost his circumstances had changed, and he was no longer able to pay. 12. The timeframe from J Ltd informing UQ that he was being held liable to J Ltd sending UQ the final repair costs was three months. Even if UQ could establish that this is an unreasonable or excessive delay, I do not see how this has any effect on UQ’s legal liability fo...

10. OQ v QM & ors [2024] NZDT 539 (22 July 2024) [pdf, 166 KB]

    ...cross- claim was essentially a claim for costs incurred in preparing for a hearing, and the tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to award such costs. Referee: John Hogan Date: 22 July 2024 Page 4 of 4 Information for Parties Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that something prevented the proper decision from being made for example, the relevant information was not available at the time. If you wish to apply for a r...