Search Results

1. Wai 2660 Public Notice Notification and Final Filing Date [pdf, 151 KB]

   WAITANGI TRIBUNAL INQUIRY UNDER THE TREATY OF WAITANGI ACT 1975 CONCERNING MARINE AND COASTAL AREA (TAKUTAI MOANA) CLAIMS (WAI 2660) NOTICE is hereby given that the Waitangi Tribunal has commenced a kaupapa inquiry into claims concerning the Marine and Coastal Area Act 2011 (the MACA Act). A final deadline for the filing of any new or amended claims seeking to participate in this inquiry has been set. Date: Wednesday 20 June 2018 Deadline: 12:00pm To: The Registrar Wait...

2. GG Ltd v IN Ltd [2022] NZDT 3 (19 January 2022) [pdf, 238 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 5 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2022] NZDT 3 APPLICANT GG Limited RESPONDENT IN Limited The Tribunal orders: The claim by GG Limited against IN Limited is dismissed. Reasons 1. The applicant company GG Limited (GG) was placed into liquidation and appointed HX of CS as Liquidator. GG through its liquidator now brings a claim against IN Limited (IN) for $1...

3. TM v B Ltd [2023] NZDT 228 (14 April 2023) [pdf, 93 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL District Court [2023] NZDT 228 APPLICANT TM RESPONDENT B Ltd The Tribunal orders: The claim by TM against B Ltd is struck out. Reasons 1. TM travelled by air from [International city 1] via [International city 2] to [NZ city]. The [International city 2] to [NZ city] leg of his journey was operated by B Ltd. A dispute has arisen in relation...

4. Saini v Dua [2016] NZIACDT 61 (26 September 2016) [pdf, 167 KB]

   ...extent. [3] The facts on which the complaint is based are: [3.1] Mr Dua’s client instructed him to apply for a partnership work visa; his current visa was due to expire after a relatively short number of weeks later. Unless Mr Dua lodged the application, his client’s visa would expire and he would be in New Zealand unlawfully. Mr Dua failed to lodge the application; his client was then in New Zealand unlawfully. [3.2] Mr Dua then lodged a request for Immigration New Zealand to a...

5. Hagar v Accident Compensation Corporation (Leave to appeal to the High Court) [2023] NZACC 040 [pdf, 162 KB]

   IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT WELLINGTON I TE KŌTI-Ā-ROHE KI TE WHANGANUI-A-TARA [2023] NZACC 40 ACR 83/21 UNDER THE ACCIDENT COMPENSATION ACT 2001 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE HIGH COURT ON A QUESTION OF LAW UNDER SECTION 162 OF THE ACT BETWEEN MICHELLE HAGAR Appellant AND ACCIDENT COMPENSATION CORPORATION Respondent Hearing: On the papers Appearances: The Appellant self-represented Ms A Douglass for...

6. KI v Q Ltd [2024] NZDT 520 (30 July 2024) [pdf, 90 KB]

   ...evidence to indicate that the Respondent misled the Applicant in any way so that he would sign the document. 12. Given this, I find that the Applicant is liable to pay the marketing costs in the amount of $2,445.00. 13. The Respondent has also claimed the amount of the debt recovery costs being $710.94. The Tribunal has limited discretion in awarding costs. In the present case, I do not consider it appropriate to award such costs. Referee: A Chand Date: 30th...

7. DC v MDC [2023] NZDT 541 (5 October 2023) [pdf, 170 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 3 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2023] NZDT 541 APPLICANT DC RESPONDENT MDC The Tribunal orders: MDC is to deliver DC’s house keys to her letterbox at the agreed address by Thursday 12 October 2023; and The balance of the claim is dismissed. Reasons 1. DC and MDC are estranged family members, whose mother was seriously ill before passing away in late October 2022....

8. KU v EG [2024] NZDT 835 (29 October 2024) [pdf, 101 KB]

   CI0301_CIV_DCDT_Order Page 1 of 4 (Disputes Tribunal Act 1988) ORDER OF DISPUTES TRIBUNAL [2024] NZDT 835 APPLICANT KU RESPONDENT EG The Tribunal orders: The claim by KU against EG is partially proved. EG is to pay KU the sum of $100 on a before 5:00 PM on 21 November 2024. Reasons KU (the applicant) purchased a property from EG (the respondent). After settlement the applicants discovered that there was a problem with the free sta...

9. [2013] NZEmpC 26 Hegedus v Actronic Ltd [pdf, 102 KB]

   ...HEGEDUS V ACTRONIC LIMITED NZEmpC AK [2013] NZEmpC 26 [7 March 2013] IN THE EMPLOYMENT COURT AUCKLAND [2013] NZEmpC 26 ARC 73/12 IN THE MATTER OF an application for leave to file challenge out of time BETWEEN MICHAEL HEGEDUS Applicant AND ACTRONIC LIMITED Respondent Hearing: By way of submissions dated 18 and 26 February 2013 Counsel: Michael Hegedus, applicant Ray Parmenter, counsel for respondent Judgment: 7 March 2013 JUDGMENT OF...

10. [2017] NZEmpC 129 Phoenix Publishing Ltd v McCallum [pdf, 111 KB]

    ...accordance with the agreement. Instead of allowing Ms McCallum to work out her notice, she was stood down from employment but received no payment in lieu of notice as required under the employment agreement. [3] Ms McCallum commenced a claim in the Employment Relations Authority for unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay entitlement and unpaid expenses. In an oral determination delivered on 13 June 2017 and confirmed in writing the same day, the following orders were made ag...